Deconstructing tongue root harmony systems
This article discusses various manifestations of tongue root (TR) harmony in African languages. I will propose an account within a model that uses variable elements and licensing. The primary goal is to deconstruct the general label ‘tongue root harmony’ into a number of subtypes, based on the formal treatment of these harmonies. Casali (2003) has shown that dominance of [+ATR] correlates with having an ATR-distinction among high vowels. If such as distinction is present we speak of a 2H system. If such a distinction is missing, we deal with a 1H system and in this case Casali observes [−ATR] dominance. I will discuss this correlation and then show that the RcvP model provides a formal basis, where the crucial point is that in the RcvP model, languages that have a contrast among two series of high vowels necessarily have a different formal representation (namely one that activates the ATR element) than languages that lack this contrast (which do not require this element to be active). This implies that the contrast between [ɛ~e] or [ɔ~o] is phonologically represented in different ways, with the consequence that in the latter (with two series of high vowels), the unary element [ATR] is active (and needs licensing to account for harmony), whereas in the former harmony can only be expressed in terms of ‘head alignment’ for the element |A|. This account suggests that both types of ‘tongue root’ harmony are fundamentally different in formal terms, which may correlate with a difference in the phonetic mechanisms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The framework
- 3.Asymmetries in African TR systems
- 4.Toward an explanatory account
- 5.Conclusions and unresolved issues
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (73)
References
Anderson, John M. 2011. Phonology-Syntax Analogies, 3 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Anderson, John M. & Charles Jones. 1974. Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–26. 

Aoki, Haruo. 1968. Toward a typology of vowel harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(2): 142–5. 

Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Backley, Phillip. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Baković, Eric. 2000. Harmony, Dominance and Control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Baković, Eric. 2001. Vowel harmony and cyclicity in Eastern Nilotic. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 27: 1–12. 

Booij, Geert E. & Jerzy Rubach. 1987. Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 1–44.
Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Casali, Roderic F.. 1996. Resolving Hiatus. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Casali, Roderic F.. 2003. [ATR] value asymmetries and underlying vowel inventory structure in Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan. Linguistic Typology 7: 307–382. 

Casali, Roderic F.. 2008. ATR harmony in African languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3): 496–549. 

Casali, Roderic F.. 2014. Assimilation, markedness and inventory structure in tongue root harmony systems. Ms, Trinity Western University. [URL].
Casali, Roderic F.. forthcoming. Some inventory-related asymmetries in the patterning of tongue root harmony systems. Ms, Trinity Western University.
Charette, Monik & Asli Göksel. 1998. Licensing constraints and vowel harmony in Turkic languages. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation: Studies in Phonology, Vol. 4, 65–89. Lublin: PASE.
Clements, George N. 1981. Akan vowel harmony: A nonlinear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2: 108–88.
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology 2: 225–52. 

Clements, George N. 2004. Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 20(3): 287–333. 

Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology (Cambridge studies in linguistics 121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst. 1998. Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology. Phonology 15: 317–52. 

Edmondson, Jerold A. & John H. Esling. 2006. The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress: Laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23(2): 157–91. 

Hall, Beatrice L., R.M.R. Hall, Martin D. Pam, Amy Myers, Stephen A. Antell & Godfrey K. Cherono. 1974. African vowel harmony systems from the vantage point of Kalenjin. Afrika und Übersee 57: 241–67.
Hall, Beatrice & Eluzai M. Yokwe. 1981. Bari vowel harmony: The evolution of a cross-height vowel harmony system. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 1: 55–63.
Harris, John. 1989. Towards a lexical analysis of sound change in progress. Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 35–56. 

Harris, John. 1990. Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7(2): 255–300. 

Harris, John. 1994a. English Sound Structure. London: Blackwell.
Harris, John. 1994b. Monovalency and opacity: Chichewa height harmony. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 509–547.
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1995. The elements for phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 34–79. London: Longman.
Harris, John & Francis Moto. 1994. Bantu height harmony: Monovalency and opacity. Ms, University College London.
Hyman, Larry M. 2002. Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? In John Rennison, Friedrich Neubarth & Markus Pöchtrager (eds.), Phonologica 2002. Berlin: Mouton.
Inkelas, Sharon. 1995. The consequences of optimization for under specification. In Jill N. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25, 287–302. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
Innes, Gordon. 1966. An Introduction to Grebo. London: School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).
Ka, Omar. 1988. Wolof Phonology and Morphology: A Non-Linear Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–28. 

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to Lexical Phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations, Vol. 1, 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kiparsky, Paul & Karl Pajusalu. 2003. Towards a typology of disharmony. The Linguistic Review 20(2–4): 217–41. 

Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 1994. KiBudu: A Bantu language with nine vowels. Africana Linguistica 11: 127–133. 

Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 2008. Nine vowels and ATR vowel harmony in Lika, a Bantu language in D.R. Congo. Africana Linguistica 14: 63–84.
Leitch, Myles F. 1996. Vowel harmonies of the Congo Basin: An Optimality Theory analysis of variation in the Bantu zone C. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.
Morén, Bruce. 2003. The Parallel Structures Model of feature geometry. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 15: 194–270.
Mous, Maarten. 1986. Vowel harmony in Tunen. In Koen Bogers, Harry van der Hulst & Maarten Mous (eds.), The Phonological Representation of Suprasegmentals, 281–295. Dordrecht: Foris. 

Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in Vowel Harmony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

Orie, Olanike Ola. 2001. An alignment-based account of vowel harmony in Ife Yoruba. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 22: 117–43. 

Polgárdi, Krisztina. 1998. Vowel Harmony: An Account in Terms of Government and Optimality. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Ribeiro, Eduardo R. 2000. [ATR] vowel harmony and palatalization in Karajá. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 10: 80–92.
Ringen, Catherine O. 1975. Vowel Harmony: Theoretical Implications. PhD dissertation, Indiana University (New York: Garland, 1988).
Ringen, Catherine O. 1979. Vowel harmony in Igbo and Diola Fogny. Studies in African Linguistics 10: 247–259.
Ritter, Nancy A. 1995. The Role of Universal Grammar in Phonology: A Government Phonology Approach to Hungarian. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Salting, Don. 1998. The Nested Subregister Model of Vowel Height. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Sapir, Edward. 1931. Notes on the Gweabo language of Liberia. Language 7: 30–41. 

Schane, Sanford A. 1984. The fundamentals of Particle Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1: 129–55. 

Singler, John V. 2008. The restructuring of the Klao vowel system and its morphophonemic consequences. Handout of paper presented at the Association of Contemporary African Linguistics 39, April 18, 2008.
Steriade, Donca. 1981. Parameters of metrical vowel harmony rules. Ms, MIT.
Stewart, John M. 1967. A theory of the origin of Akan vowel harmony. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 6: 863–865.
Stewart, John M. 1983. Akan vowel harmony: The word structure conditions and the floating vowels. Studies in African Linguistics 14: 111–139.
van der Hulst, Harry. 1988a. The geometry of vocalic features. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Features, Segmental Structure and Harmony Processes, Vol. 2, 77–125. Dordrecht: Foris.
Hulst, Harry van der. 1988b. The dual interpretation of |i|, |u| and |a|. NELS 18: 208–222.
van der Hulst, Harry. 1995. Radical CV Phonology: The categorial gesture. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 80–116. London: Longman.
van der Hulst, Harry. 2012. A minimal framework for vowel harmony. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues, 155–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

van der Hulst, Harry. 2014. Lowering harmony in Bantu. In Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi & Nicola Lampitelli (eds.), The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in Honor of Jean Lowenstamm (Language Faculty and Beyond 12), 13–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

van der Hulst, Harry. 2015b. The opponent principle in RcvP: Binarity in a unary system. In Eric Raimy & Charles Cairns (eds.), The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology, 149–179. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
van der Hulst, Harry. 2016a. Monovalent ‘features’ in phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(2): 83–102. 

van der Hulst, Harry. 2016b. Vowel Harmony (Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics). Online: URL.
van der Hulst, Harry. in prep. Principles of Radical cv Phonology. Ms, University of Connecticut.
van der Hulst, Harry. to appear a. Asymmetries in Vowel Harmony – A Representational Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Hulst, Harry & Norval Smith. 1986. On neutral vowels. In Koen Bogers, Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The Phonological Representation of Suprasegmentals, 233–279. Dordrecht: Foris. 

van der Hulst, Harry & Jeroen van de Weijer. 1995. Vowel harmony. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 495–534. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Walker, Rachel. 2010. Nonmyopic harmony and the nature of derivations. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 169–179. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter
2024.
The Oxford Handbook of Vowel Harmony,

van der Hulst, Harry
2018.
Asymmetries in Vowel Harmony,

van der Hulst, Harry & Jeroen van de Weijer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.