Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 41:2 (2018) ► pp.224–239

Word frequency counts

Linking corpus data to user’s perception in linguistic research

 | Adam Mickiewicz University
Lexical frequency is one of the major variables involved in language processing. It constitutes a cornerstone of psycholinguistic, corpus linguistic as well as applied research. Linguists take frequency counts from corpora and they started to take them for granted. However, voices emerge that corpora may not always provide a comprehensive picture of how frequently lexical items appear in a language. In the present contribution I compare corpus frequency counts for English and Polish words to native speakers’ perception of frequency. The analysis shows that, while generally objective and subjective values are related, there is a disparity between measures for frequent Polish words. The direction of the relationship, though positive, is also not as strong as in previous studies. I suggest linking objective with subjective frequency measures in research.
Keywords: word frequency, corpus linguistics, English, Polish, subjective estimation, research design
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Experiment – methods
    • 1.1Aims and hypotheses
    • 1.2Participants
    • 1.3Materials
    • 1.4Procedure
    • 1.5Data analysis
    • 1.6Results
  • 2.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00021.brz
References (36)
References
Alderson, J. C. 2007. Judging the frequency of English words. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 383–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Paul, S., & Spieler, D. H. 1999. Attentional control of lexical processing pathways during word recognition and reading. In S. Garrod, & M. Pickering (Eds.), Language Processing. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. 2001. Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 291, 639–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. 2004. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. I., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 445–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., & Evert, S. 2005. Testing the extrapolation quality of word frequency models. In P. Danielsson, & M. Wagenmakers. (Eds.) Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. 2011. The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58(5), 412–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. 2016. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 421, 441–458.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1971. Measurement properties of subjective magnitude estimates of word frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 101, 722–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coane, J. H., & Balota, D. A. 2010. Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency and retrieval test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(12), 2376–2398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T., & Boulton, A. 2015. Classroom applications of corpus analysis. In Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 478–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. 2000. A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2): 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. 1992. Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1001–1018.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & Van den Eijnden, E. 2002. Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 471, 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. 2011. Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: An introduction. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desrochers, A., & Bergeron, M. 2000. Valeurs de frequence subjective et d’imagerie pour un echantillon de 1,916 substantifs de la langue francaise. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 54(4), 274–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Baum, S., Dickson, D., & Federmeier, K. 2014. Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1342–1355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. 1984. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1131, 256–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Divjak, D. 2012. Frequency effects in language learning and processing. Volume 11. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W. & Rayner, K. 1986. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 401, 431–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. 2012. Conducting Reaction Time Research in Second Language Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. 1992. Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics, 105–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M. 2015. SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGee, I. 2008. Word frequency estimates revisited – a response to Alderson (2007). Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 509–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, M. P. 1998. Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, M. 2015. Is corpus word frequency a good yardstick for selecting words to teach? Threshold levels for vocabulary selection. System, 511, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford 3000™ Word List. Oxford University Press.
Reynolds, B. L. 2015. The effects of word form variation and frequency on second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(4), 467–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringeling, T. 1984. Subjective estimates as a useful alternative to word frequency counts. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 8(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
Schad, D. J., Risse, S., Slattery, T., Rayner, K. 2014. Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye movements during reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3), 390–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 2 (BNC World) 2001. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: [URL]
Thompson, G., & Desrochers, A. 2009. Corroborating biased indicators: Global and local agreement among objective and subjective estimates of printed word frequency. Behaviour Research Methods, 41(2), 452–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. 2014. SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Clasmeier, Christina & Tanja Anstatt
2024. “How Often Do You Encounter the Verb Obnaruzhit’?” Subjective Frequency of Russian Verbs in Heritage Speakers and Other Types of Russian–German Bilinguals. Languages 9:8 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Cangır, Hakan
2021. Objective and subjective collocational frequency. Pedagogical Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.