Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 42:2 (2019) ► pp.234–261

The predicative adjective and its propositional arguments

A lexicon-grammar classification

 | University of Salerno
The purpose of this paper is to classify Italian adjectives that have the predicative function and accept a complement clause (Ch F) or an infinitive (V-inf) in N0 or N1 . For the formation of the word list, we have used electronic dictionaries from the “DELA” system in use in the Department of Communication Sciences at the University of Salerno (now Department of Political and Communication Sciences) and De Mauro Dictionaries (2000a and 2000b).
34,132 adjectives of the Nooj list have been examined. The acquired data have been subjected to further verifications in order to obtain the adjectives responding to the basic theoretical hypothesis. The adjectives have been classified according to the principles of Lexicon-Grammar methodology as developed by Maurice Gross (1975, 1981 and further). The result was a list of 1,732 entries relating to 1,619 adjectives classified in 10 classes.
Keywords: adjective, predicative function, complement clause, infinitive
Article outline
  • 1.The arguments of the predicative adjective
  • 2.The construction SN essere Agg
  • 3.Classification
  • 4. Ch F and V-inf as a propositional subject of the predicative adjective
    • 4.1Ap1a = N0 V → (Ch F + V-inf)0 essere Agg
    • 4.2Ap1b = N0 V → Ch F0 essere Agg
    • 4.3Ap1c = N0 V → V-inf0 essere Agg
    • 4.4Ap2 = N0 V Prep N1 → (Ch F + V-inf)0 essere Agg Prep N1
  • 5.The structure N0 essere Agg (E + Prep) N1
    • 5.1Ap3 = N0 V Prep N1 → Num0 essere Agg ((del fatto) Ch F + di V-inf)1
    • 5.2Ap4 = N0 V Prep N1 → (Num + N-um)0 essere Agg a (Ch F + V-inf)1
    • 5.3Ap5 = N0 V Prep N1 → ((Il fatto) Ch F + V-inf)0 essere Agg (simm) Prep ((Il fatto) Ch F + V-inf)1
    • 5.4Ap6 = N0 V Prep N1 → (Num + N-um + il fatto (Ch F + di V-inf))0 essere Agg Prep il fatto (Ch F + di V-inf)1
  • 6.ApFI - Definitional structures of indirect interrogative clauses
  • 7.A short final note
  • Notes
  • Selected references
Published online: 16 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00035.mes
References (27)
Selected references
Acquaviva, P. 1991. Frasi argomentali: completive e soggettive. In L. Renzi e G. Salvi (eds.), Grande grammatica di consultazione, vol. II1, 633–674. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Borillo, A. 1971. Remarques sur les verbes symétriques français. Langue française, 111, 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, E. (1993). Sociolinguistica computazionale. Un’applicazione al corpus di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Salerno: 10/17.Google Scholar
De Mauro, T. 2000a. Il dizionario della lingua italiana. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
2000b. Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso (GRADIT). Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Elia, A. 1984, Le verbe italien. Les complétives dans les phrases à un complément. Fasano-Paris: Schena-Nizet.Google Scholar
Fava, E. 1977. Alcuni problemi di una regola di promozione nella grammatica relazionale. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 87–124 ([URL])
Giry-Schneider, J. 2017. Sintassi nascosta degli aggettivi. Spunti dal francese. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Gross, M. 1975. Méthodes en syntaxe. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
1981. Les bases empiriques de la notion de predicat semantique. Langages, 15(63), 7–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Les verbes supports d’adjectifs et le passif. Langages, 30 (121), 8–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. La fonction sémantique des verbes supports. Travaux de Linguistique: Revue Internationale de Linguistique Française, 37 (1), 25–46.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. 1976. Notes du cours de syntaxe. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
1978. Operator-Grammar of English. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 2 (1), 55–92 (now in Harris 1981, 412–35). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. Papers on syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982. A Grammar of English on Mathematical Principles. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hicks, G. 2009. Tough-constructions and their derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 40 (4), 535–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H. & Fiengo, R. 1974. Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry, 5 (4), 535–71.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R. & Savoia, L. M. 2003. The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 281, 87–110.Google Scholar
Meunier, A. 1999. Une construction complexe N0hum être Adj de V0-inf W caractéristique de certains adjectifs à sujet humain. Langages, 33 (133), 12–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picabia, L. 1978. Les constructions adjectivales en Français. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Postal, P. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Riegel, M. 1985. L’adjectif attribut. Paris: Presses universitaires de France (P.U.F.).Google Scholar
1997. Il est gentil de nous avoir aidés ou à propos de compléments de l’adjectif qui n’en sont pas vraiment. In G. Kleiber et M. Riegel (éds) Les formes du sens: études de linguistique française, médiévale et générale offertes à Robert Martin à l’occasion de ses 60 ans, 355–65. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Yinghua, Wu, Meng Shaoxiu, Wang Juan & Jun Ye
2022. Attribute Feature Classification of English Grammar Entry Base Based on Support Vector Machine Classification Algorithm. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.