2020. Antipassives in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Marini, Emanuela
2014. L'opposition actif vs. déponent et la persistance du moyen en latin. Langages N° 194:2 ► pp. 49 ff.
Loporcaro, Michele
2007. On triple auxiliation in Romance. Linguistics 45:1
LAKA, ITZIAR
2006. Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive. In ERGATIVITY [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 65], ► pp. 173 ff.
Nouguier Voisin, Sylvie
2006. Antipassif et langues accusatives. In Linguistique typologique, ► pp. 193 ff.
Watanabe, Akira
1996. WH-Agreement. In Case Absorption and WH-Agreement [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 37], ► pp. 170 ff.
Davies, William D.
1995. Javanese adversatives, passives and Mapping Theory. Journal of Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Wilkinson, Edwin M.
1987. Review article. Australian Journal of Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Böhm, Roger
1986. Indirect object advancement: From relational to case grammar (via Kalkatungu)∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Gibson, Jeanne & Eduardo Raposo
1986. Clause union, the stratal uniqueness law and the ch�meur relation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4:3 ► pp. 295 ff.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985. Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Anderson, Stephen R.
1984. On representations in morphology case, agreement and inversion in Georgian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Perlmutter, David M.
1982. Syntactic Representation, Syntactic Levels, and the Notion of Subject. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation, ► pp. 283 ff.
[no author supplied]
1986. References. In Linguistic Theory in America, ► pp. 231 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.