The acquisition of German declension in additive and concept-based approaches to instruction via computer-based
cognitive tutors
This study examines the different learning outcomes of two computer-based cognitive tutors using two approaches to
instructing German declension: an additive, bottom-up approach, which focuses on a stepwise introduction of each case, and a
concept-based, top-down approach, which focuses on developing students’ conceptual understanding of the functions related to each
case form and the case marking system as a whole. The results indicate that both groups learned, but what and how they learned
differed depending on the method of instruction. The additive group showed general gains in production and a slight increase in
their ability to correctly interpret object-first sentences. The concept-based group showed larger gains, but in fewer areas.
Specifically, the production of adjective endings increased, although there were no differences in determiner production or
accuracy. The concept-based group also had a larger gain in their ability to interpret non-SVO word order sentences. This study
shows how concept-based approaches to grammar can outperform additive ones, and that the development of these concepts can prepare
students for future learning.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Instruction of L2 German case
- 2.2The importance of noticing in case acquisition instruction
- 2.3Bottom-up, additive approaches
- 2.4Top-down, conceptual approaches
- 2.5Empirical classroom-based studies of L2 German case marking
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Instructional treatment
- 4.2.1The additive tutor
- 4.2.2The concept-based tutor
- 4.3Data collection materials
- 4.3.1The picture identification task
- 4.3.2The sentence translation task
- 4.3.3The reflection task
- 4.4Procedure
- 5.The picture identification task
- 6.The sentence translation task
- 7.The reflection task
- 8.Conclusion
-
References
References (50)
References
Arnett, C., & Jernigan, H. (2014). A cognitive grammar account of case for L2 students of German. German as a Foreign Language, 11, 68–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnett, C., & Lysinger, D. (2013). A cognitive grammar approach to teaching the Russian case system. Russian Language Journal/Русский язык, 631, 135–168.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baten, K., & Lochtman, K. (2014). Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick. MUTTERSPRACHE, 124(1), 1–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass and J. Schachter (Eds.) Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H. & Muysken, P. (1996). How adult second language learning differs from child first language development: Commentary on Epstein et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 191, 721–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Rycker, A., & De Knop, S. (2017). Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and foreign language teaching: Historical background and new developments. Journal of Modern Languages, 19(1), 30–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 191, 677–714. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1967). The case for case. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, (pp. 1–88). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackson, C. N. (2007). Information, word order, and case markings during comprehension by L2 Learners of German. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 543–587. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Köpcke, K. & Zubin, D. (1983). Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik II1, 166–182.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Köpcke, K. & Zubin, D. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 931, 26–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liamkina, O. (2005). The role of explicit meaning-based instruction in foreign language pedagogy: Applications of Cognitive Linguistics to teaching the German dative case to advanced learners (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3193301).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liamkina, O. & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for meaning making. The Modern Language Journal 96(2), 270–289. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lipka, L. (1976). Topicalization, case grammar and lexical decomposition in English. Archivum Linguisticum, 71, 118–141.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lysinger, D. (2015). The case for hidden meaning: An application of cognitive linguistics in the Russian classroom. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, & A. Labarca (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–258). Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morpho-phonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43(1).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. J., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. L. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 255–277. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 109–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mills, A. (1986). The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry and B. A. Lafford (Eds.) The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 79–102). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallotti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 361–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritterbusch, R., LaFond, L., & Agustin, M. (2006). Learner difficulties with German case: Implications from an action research study. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 391, 30–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 451, 283–331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 193–213. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salimi, A., & Dadashpour, S. (2012). Task complexity and language production dilemmas (Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis vs. Skehan’s Trade-off Model). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 461, 643–652. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 111, 11–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, 31(4), 71–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thielmann, W. (2007). Fallstudie: Kasus in Sprachtheorie und Sprachvermittlung. Zielsprache Deutsch, 34(3), 11–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tracy, R. (1986). The acquisition of case morphology in German. Linguistics, 24(1), 47–78. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Compernolle, R. A., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A. (2016). Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 341–361. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B. & Borst, S. (2012). The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in Processing Instruction: Nominative-Accusative case marking and word order in German L2. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 92–109.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J. E., Borst, S., & Qualin, A. (2013). Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the first-noun principle: A cross-linguistic study in Processing Instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 506–527. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walter, D. R., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2017). Teaching German declension as meaning: a concept-based approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 68–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (1986). Markedness and parameter setting: some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik, & J. R. Wirth (Eds) Markedness (pp. 309-327). Boston, MA: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubin, D. & Köpcke, K. (1981). Gender: a less than arbitrary grammatical category. Chicago Linguistic Society 171, 439–449.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Walter, Daniel R.
2023.
Boundary Crossing from the Start: 55 Years of Second Language Grammatical Gender Research in Review. In
Crossing Boundaries in Researching, Understanding, and Improving Language Education [
Educational Linguistics, 58],
► pp. 57 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.