The acquisition of German declension in additive and concept-based approaches to instruction via computer-based
cognitive tutors
This study examines the different learning outcomes of two computer-based cognitive tutors using two approaches to
instructing German declension: an additive, bottom-up approach, which focuses on a stepwise introduction of each case, and a
concept-based, top-down approach, which focuses on developing students’ conceptual understanding of the functions related to each
case form and the case marking system as a whole. The results indicate that both groups learned, but what and how they learned
differed depending on the method of instruction. The additive group showed general gains in production and a slight increase in
their ability to correctly interpret object-first sentences. The concept-based group showed larger gains, but in fewer areas.
Specifically, the production of adjective endings increased, although there were no differences in determiner production or
accuracy. The concept-based group also had a larger gain in their ability to interpret non-SVO word order sentences. This study
shows how concept-based approaches to grammar can outperform additive ones, and that the development of these concepts can prepare
students for future learning.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Instruction of L2 German case
- 2.2The importance of noticing in case acquisition instruction
- 2.3Bottom-up, additive approaches
- 2.4Top-down, conceptual approaches
- 2.5Empirical classroom-based studies of L2 German case marking
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Instructional treatment
- 4.2.1The additive tutor
- 4.2.2The concept-based tutor
- 4.3Data collection materials
- 4.3.1The picture identification task
- 4.3.2The sentence translation task
- 4.3.3The reflection task
- 4.4Procedure
- 5.The picture identification task
- 6.The sentence translation task
- 7.The reflection task
- 8.Conclusion
-
References
References
Arnett, C., & Jernigan, H.
(
2014)
A cognitive grammar account of case for L2 students of German.
German as a Foreign Language, 11, 68–93.
Arnett, C., & Lysinger, D.
(
2013)
A cognitive grammar approach to teaching the Russian case system.
Russian Language Journal/
Русский язык, 631, 135–168.
Baten, K., & Lochtman, K.
(
2014)
Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick.
MUTTERSPRACHE, 124(1), 1–25.
Bley-Vroman, R.
(
1989)
What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In
S. Gass and
J. Schachter (Eds.)
Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clahsen, H. & Muysken, P.
(
1996)
How adult second language learning differs from child first language development: Commentary on Epstein et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 191, 721–23.
Davydov, V. V.
(
1990)
Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
De Rycker, A., & De Knop, S.
(
2017)
Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and foreign language teaching: Historical background and new developments.
Journal of Modern Languages, 19(1), 30–46.
Ellis, N. C.
(
2008)
Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In
P. Robinson &
N. C. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
(
1996)
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 191, 677–714.
Fillmore, C. J.
(
1967)
The case for case. In
E. Bach and
R. T. Harms (Eds.),
Universals in Linguistic Theory, (pp. 1–88). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, C. N.
(
2007)
Information, word order, and case markings during comprehension by L2 Learners of German.
The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432.
Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B.
(
1998)
The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(4), 543–587.
Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B.
(
1999)
Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 129–171.
Köpcke, K. & Zubin, D.
(
1983)
Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache.
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik II1, 166–182.
Köpcke, K. & Zubin, D.
(
1984)
Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation.
Linguistische Berichte, 931, 26–50.
Liamkina, O.
(
2005)
The role of explicit meaning-based instruction in foreign language pedagogy: Applications of Cognitive Linguistics to teaching the German dative case to advanced learners (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3193301).
Liamkina, O. & Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(
2012)
Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for meaning making.
The Modern Language Journal 96(2), 270–289.
Lipka, L.
(
1976)
Topicalization, case grammar and lexical decomposition in English.
Archivum Linguisticum, 71, 118–141.
Lysinger, D.
(
2015)
The case for hidden meaning: An application of cognitive linguistics in the Russian classroom. In
K. Masuda,
C. Arnett, &
A. Labarca (Eds.),
Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–258). Berlin: de Gruyter.
MacWhinney, B.
(
1978)
The acquisition of morpho-phonology.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43(1).
MacWhinney, B. J., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. L.
(
1989)
Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 255–277.
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(
1981)
On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 109–135.
Mills, A.
(
1986)
The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J.
(
2006)
Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In
R. Salaberry and
B. A. Lafford (Eds.)
The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 79–102). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science.
Pallotti, G.
(
2007)
An operational definition of the emergence criterion.
Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 361–382.
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F.
(
2014)
How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research.
Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
Ritterbusch, R., LaFond, L., & Agustin, M.
(
2006)
Learner difficulties with German case: Implications from an action research study.
Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 391, 30–45.
Robinson, P.
(
1995)
Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis.
Language Learning, 451, 283–331.
Robinson, P.
(
2007)
Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty.
International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 193–213.
Salimi, A., & Dadashpour, S.
(
2012)
Task complexity and language production dilemmas (Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis vs. Skehan’s Trade-off Model).
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 461, 643–652.
Schmidt, R.
(
1990)
The role of consciousness in second language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158.
Schmidt, R.
(
1994)
Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics.
AILA Review, 111, 11–26.
Schmidt, R.
(
1995)
Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In
R. Schmidt (Ed.)
Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R.
(
1994)
Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage.
Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, 31(4), 71–89.
Thielmann, W.
(
2007)
Fallstudie: Kasus in Sprachtheorie und Sprachvermittlung.
Zielsprache Deutsch, 34(3), 11–34.
Tracy, R.
(
1986)
The acquisition of case morphology in German.
Linguistics, 24(1), 47–78.
van Compernolle, R. A., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A.
(
2016)
Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study.
The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 341–361.
VanPatten, B. & Borst, S.
(
2012)
The roles of explicit information and grammatical sensitivity in Processing Instruction: Nominative-Accusative case marking and word order in German L2.
Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 92–109.
VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., Price, J. E., Borst, S., & Qualin, A.
(
2013)
Explicit information, grammatical sensitivity, and the first-noun principle: A cross-linguistic study in Processing Instruction.
The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 506–527.
Walter, D. R., & van Compernolle, R. A.
(
2017)
Teaching German declension as meaning: a concept-based approach.
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 68–85.
White, L.
(
1986)
Markedness and parameter setting: some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition. In
F. R. Eckman,
E. A. Moravcsik, &
J. R. Wirth (Eds)
Markedness (pp. 309-327). Boston, MA: Springer.
Zubin, D. & Köpcke, K.
(
1981)
Gender: a less than arbitrary grammatical category.
Chicago Linguistic Society 171, 439–449.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Walter, Daniel R.
2023.
Boundary Crossing from the Start: 55 Years of Second Language Grammatical Gender Research in Review. In
Crossing Boundaries in Researching, Understanding, and Improving Language Education [
Educational Linguistics, 58],
► pp. 57 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.