The dual origin of gesture
Semiotic preconditions for the emergence of two kinds of symbolic
gestures
This article questions some aspects of
McNeill’s (2014) “imagistic” conception of gesture and his theory of
the origin of language. In their stead, the article presents a kinesiological
approach, and advances a hypothesis for a dual origin of symbolic gesture. The
significance of the human artifactual environment in this context allows us to
give precedence to brachial articulation over image. In nonhuman apes, the
dyadic brachial origins of gestures show striking similarities in form and
meaning to human brachial gestures. Manual gestures linked to object
manipulation appeared as humankind acquired manual skills. These gestures
express triadic values. Before speech, humans most probably already used dyadic
symbolic gestures.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.An imagistic semiotics of gesture?
- 2.1The relative importance of the influence of vision and proprioception
- 2.2From praxic to symbolic gestures
- 2.3Does ontogeny support the imagistic approach to gesture?
- 3.The evolution of gestures and neuroscience
- 3.1Single or dual gestural origin?
- 3.1.1Communicative gestural organization in nonhuman primates
- 3.1.2Semantic proximities of brachial gestures between great apes and humans
- 3.2A dual origin of gestures in evolution?
- 4.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.