References (43)
References
Bahrani, N., & Modarresi Ghavami, G. (2021). Khuzestani Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 51 (2), 299–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2021). Cross-modal cross-linguistic influence on second language phonology: Consonant spelling and consonant duration in Italian L1 speakers of English L2. Colloque International du Réseau d’Acquisition des Langues Secondes (RéAL2), Université Toulouse 2 Jean Jaurès, 5–7 July 2021.Google Scholar
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171–204). York Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (1992). On cognates. Second Language Research, 8 (2), 93–119.Google Scholar
(2012). Segmentation on first exposure to an L2: Evidence for knowledge-driven, top-down processing. In K. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel, & B. Hänel-Faulhaber (Eds.), HSM13 Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (pp. 23–45). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language. Second Language Research, 29 (2), 131–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Processing ‘words’ in early-stage foreign language acquisition: A comparison of first exposure and low proficiency learners. In Z.-H. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First exposure to a second language: Learners’ initial input processing (pp. 107–138). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E., & Windsor, J. W. (2015). Segmental targets versus lexical interference. Production of second-language targets on first exposure and the result of minimal training. In H. Peukert, (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 53–86). John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotter, W. M. (2020). The Arabic dialect of Gaza City. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 52 (1), 122–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2001). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Dimroth, C., Rast, R., Starren, M., & Watorek, M. (2013). Methods for studying a new language under controlled input conditions: The VILLA project. Eurosla Yearbook, 13 1, 109–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–273). York Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model of language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1 1, 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Fodor’s guide to mental representation: The intelligent Auntie’s Vade-Mecum. Mind, 94 (373), 76–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, C., & Smith, C. L. (1993). Illustrations of the IPA: French. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 23 1, 73–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. (2017). Models linking production and comprehension. In E. M. Fernández & H. Smith Cairns (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 157–181). Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (2012). Phonological representation. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. Online DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., & Dimroth, C. (2012). What word-level knowledge can adult learners acquire after minimal exposure to a new language? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50 (4), 239–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50 (2), 245–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Clarifying the scope of conceptual transfer. Language Learning, 66 (3), 608–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, now you don’t. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–134). Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1986). An eye for an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In E. Kellerman & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–48). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mustafawi, E. (2017). Arabic phonology. In The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics (pp. 11–31). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T., & Jarvis, S. (2004). Same source, different outcomes: A study of Swedish influence on the acquisition of English in Finland. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1 1, 123 – 140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, H. (2016). The effects of L2 experience on L3 perception. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13 (4), 459–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlovskaya, N., Ho-Cheong Leung, A., Jarad, S., & Young-Scholten, M. (2013). What do adult L2 learners know about phonology after minimal exposure? Opening new lines of communication in applied linguistics: Proceedings of the 46th BAAL Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, 393–408.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics, 18 1, 375–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rast, R. (2008). Foreign language input: Initial processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rast, R., & Dommergues, J.-Y. (2003). Towards a characterisation of saliency on first exposure to a second language. In S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook 3 1 (pp. 131–156). John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of L1 in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2001). Lexical transfer in L3 production. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 59–68). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubach, J. (1984). Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35 1, 606–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, E. (2009). Acoustic cues to speech segmentation in spoken French: Native and non-native strategies, PhD Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
(2014). The development of perceptual sensitivity to Polish sibilants at first exposure. Proceedings of AMP 2014. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E., & Rast, R. (2013). Extracting words from the speech stream at first exposure. Second Language Research, 29 (2), 165–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Owens, N. (2010). The role of acoustic cues in the development of (non-) target-like second-language prosodic representations. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55 1, 85–114.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 295–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar