Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.202–236

Interrelationships between Time and Space in English and French discourse

Implications for second language acquisition

 | CNRS – Université Paris 8
This paper explores the expression of temporal boundaries in narrative discourse drawing on cartoon-elicited productions which narrate caused and/or voluntary motion events involving four types of paths. We hypothesise that the way speakers express temporal boundaries depends on the “framing” of their first language (Talmy 2000). We therefore examine productions by speakers of L1 French (V-framed language), L1 English (S-framed) and English learners of L2 French at three levels of proficiency. Productions may include a Setting section and a Main event. Findings show that each speaker group has its own mode of expressing temporal and spatial boundaries. The choice in L1 French depends on Path type, but not in L1 English. English learners of L2 French pattern more like L1 French speakers for verbal morphology, but their expression of space is nearly similar to their L1 English. The discussion highlights implications of this linguistic framing type for L2 acquisition.
Keywords: SLA, Linguistics typology, psycholinguistics, French., verbal morphology, Space, English, Time
Published online: 21 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.2.02dem
References (64)
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham & R. Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(1), 89–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007) Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(5), 689–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beavers, J. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2), 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (eds.), A handbook of cognitive linguistics and SLA (378–406). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 41, 183–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (1997). Relation entre grammaticalisation et conceptualisation et implications sur l’acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 91, 83–115. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 1061, 579–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science 341, 387–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalozin-Dovrat, L. (2015). Les rapports entre le temps et l’espace dans les théories linguistiques. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris IV & Tel Aviv University.
Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the acquisition of language (26–64). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barddal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V. & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demagny, A.-C. (2012). Paths in L2 Acquisition: The expression of temporality in spatially oriented narratives. In M. Watorek, S. Benazzo & M. Hickmann (eds.), Comparative perspectives on language acquisition – A tribute to Clive Perdue (482–501). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demagny, A.C. (2013). L’expression du temps et de l’espace en français et en anglais : perspectives typologiques sur l’acquisition des langues par l’adulte. Langue Française 179, 109–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M., Eshuis, H., Martinez, L. & Listhaug, K. (2012). No evidence of L1 Path Encoding Strategies in the L2 in advanced Bulgarian speakers of Norwegian. Spatial Cognition and Computation. Special Issue: First and Second Language Acquisition of Spatial Language 12(4), 275–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortis, J.-M. (2010). Space in language: The typology of motion events. Talmy’s typology. Leipzig summer school on linguistic typology (August 14-28). [Online] [URL]Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. & Meltzoff, A.N. (1996). The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology 9(2), 211–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habel, C. & Eschenbach, C. (1997). Abstract structures in spatial cognition. In C. Freksa, M. Jantzen & R. Valk (eds.), Foundations of computer science - potential - theory - cognition (369–378). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harr, A.-K. (2012). Language-specific factors in first language acquisition. The expression of motion events in French and German. Studies on language acquisition 48. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time. Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Lincom studies in theoretical linguistics 3. München-Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Hendriks, H. (1998). Comment il monte le chat ? En grimpant ! L’acquisition de l’empaquetage spatial en chinois, français et allemand L1 et L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 111, 147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed.) (2005). The structure of learner varieties. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M. & Demagny, A.-C. (2008). How adult English learners of French express caused motion: A comparison with English and French natives. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 271, 15–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H. & Hickmann, M. (2015). Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary crossing by English learners’s of French. The Modern Language Journal. Supplement: The Language and Thought of Motion in Second Language Speakers 99(S1), 14–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. & Hendriks, H. (2010). Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics 21(2), 189–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (in press). Time talk in narrative discourse: Evidence from child and adult language acquisition. In J. Guéron (ed.), Sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Kamp, H. (1981). Evénements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle. Langages 641, 34–64.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press; Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History (1997) 7(1–4), 1-38.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition, (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. (2003). La subordination dans les récits d’apprenants avances francophones et germanophones de l’anglais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 191, 41–69 [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Acquisition en L2 des principes d’organisation de récits spécifiques aux langues. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 261, 11–29.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Foundations of cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. (2007). L’influence de la L1 dans l’organisation des discours chez les apprenants avancés / quasi-bilingues : le cas de l’aspect « en déroulement » en français et en anglais. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Paris 8.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. & Lenart, E. (2015). Rôle de la subordination pour construire les chaînes événementielles du récit chez des apprenants avancés du français L2. In P. Trévisiol & M. Kaheraoui (eds.), Relatives et autres subordonnées - regards croisés en linguistique, acquisition et didactique (79–102). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes (PUR).Google Scholar
Maouene, J., Hidaka, S. & Smith, B.L. (2008). Body parts and early-learned verbs. Cognitive Science 32(7), 1200–1216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B.C. & Sloman, S.A. (2003). Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 61, 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba (ed.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Navarro, S. & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (102–107). Somerville, MA.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Nikitina, T. (2008). Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: the case of into and in . In A. Ashbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke & R. Nouwenn (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P (175–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (ed.) (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages. Bristol: Multilingual-Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J. & Grand, S. (2007). How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pourcel, S. & Kopecka, A. (2005). Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 111, 139–153.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2000). Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung. A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. PhD. Thesis. University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In D. Diskin Ravid & H.B.-Z. Shyldkrot (eds.), Relating narrative events in translation: Typological and contextual perspectives: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (219–257). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (1991 [1997]). The parameter of aspect. (2nd edition, 1997). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). The domain of tense. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time (597–620). Cambridge, Mass: MIT.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. (2011). Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8(2), 138–179.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. von & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H.D. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (40–53). Georgetown: GUP.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. von, Carroll, M. & Klein, W. (2009). New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages. In W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), The expression of time (195–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. von & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C.W. Pfaff (ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (191–205). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000 [2003]). Toward a cognitive semantics. Typology and process in concept structuring, vol. 1 & 21. 2nd edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). The relation of grammar to cognition. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (69–108). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. PDF online: [URL].
Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language – An investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66(2), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watorek, M. (2004). Construction du discours par des apprenants de langues, enfants et adultes. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 201, 129–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2007). Spatial semantics. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. & Yangklan, P. (2004). A third way of travel; the place of Thai in motion-event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Soroli, Efstathia
2024. How language influences spatial thinking, categorization of motion events, and gaze behavior: a cross-linguistic comparison. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Arslangul, Arnaud, Henriëtte Hendriks, Maya Hickmann & Annie-Claude Demagny
2018. L’expression des procès spatiaux causatifs chez les apprenants francophones du chinois. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9:2 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Watorek, Marzena & Sophie Wauquier-Gravelines
2016. Diversité d’approches et de méthodes en acquisition des langues secondes. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXI:2 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.