Article published In:
Genre- and register-related discourse features in contrastEdited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Languages in Contrast 14:1] 2014
► pp. 58–72
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Languages in Contrast 14:1] 2014
► pp. 58–72
A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages
Stems in English and French
Contrastive studies of phraseology have tended to focus on figurative units, such as idioms and metaphors, and paid comparatively less attention to less colourful types of units such as collocations and lexical bundles, which are equally, if not more, worthy of study. This article tries to fill this gap by exploring the potential contribution of a lexical bundle approach to language comparison. Some guidelines are presented to help solve some of the methodological challenges posed by a cross-linguistic comparison of lexical bundles. The approach is illustrated with a study of lexical bundles in English and French with a particular focus on units that have a metadiscursive function. Two different genres are compared — parliamentary debates and newspaper editorials — in an attempt to tease out systemic differences between languages and genre effects.
Keywords: phraseology, parliamentary debates, lexical bundles, English/French, editorials
References (37)
Altenberg, B. 1998. “On the Phraseology of Spoken English”. In
Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications
, A.P. Cowie (ed), 101–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, N. 2005.
Translation, Linguistics, Culture: a French-English Handbook
. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.. 
Bal, B. 2010.“Analysis of Four-word Lexical Bundles in Published Research Articles Written by Turkish Scholars”.
Applied Linguistics and English as a Second Language Theses
. Paper 2. Available at [URL] [Last accessed 11 August 2013].
Bestgen, Y. In press. “Inadequacy of the Chi-squared Test to Examine Vocabulary Differences between Corpora”.
Literary and Linguistic Computing
..
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999.
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. 2004. “If you Look at … Lexical Bundles in University Lectures and Textbooks”.
Applied Linguistics
251:371–405. .
.Biber, D. and Tracy-Ventura, N. 2007. “Dimensions of Register Variation in Spanish”. In
Working with Spanish corpora
, G. Parodi (ed), 54–89. London: Continuum.
Breivega K., Dahl, D. and Fløttum, K. 2002.“Traces of Self and Others in Research Articles. A Comparative Pilot Study of English, French and Norwegian Research Articles in Medicine, Economics and Linguistics”.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
12(2):218–239. .
.Cartoni, B. and Meyer, T. 2012.“Extracting Directional and Comparable Corpora from a Multilingual Corpus for Translation Studies”.
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Istanbul
, 21–27 May 20121: 2132–2137.
Cartoni, B., Zufferey, S., Meyer, T. and Popescu-Belis, A. 2011. “How Comparable are Parallel Corpora? Measuring the Distribution of General Vocabulary and Connectives”.
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Building and Using Comparable Corpora, 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
, Portland, Oregon, 24 June 2011. 78–86.
Chen, Y.H. and Baker, P. 2010. “Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing”.
Language Learning and Technology
14(2):30–49.
Cortes, V. 2008. “A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Academic History Writing in English and Spanish”.
Corpora
3(1):43–57. .
.Dayrell, C. 2008. “Investigating the Preference of Translators for Recurrent Lexical Patterns: a Corpus-based Study”.
Trans-Kom
1(1):36–57.
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. and Kinn, T. 2006.
Academic Voices
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .
Granger, S. and Lefer, M.-A. 2012. “Towards More and Better Phrasal Entries in Bilingual Dictionaries”. In
Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress
, R. Vatvedt Fjeld and J.M. Torjusen (eds), 682–692. Oslo: UiO.
and Lefer, M.-A. 2013. “Enriching the Phraseological Coverage of High-frequency Adverbs in English-French Bilingual Dictionaries”. In
Advances in Corpus-Based Contrastive Linguistics,
B. Altenberg and K. Aijmer (eds), 157–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins..
Hanks, P. 2012. “Corpus Evidence and Electronic Lexicography”. In
Electronic Lexicography
, S. Granger and M. Paquot (eds), 57–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
.Hervey, S. and Higgins, I. 2002.
Thinking French Translation
. London: Routledge..
Hyland, K. 2005.
Metadiscourse
. London: Continuum.
Ilie, C. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”.
Journal of Language and Politics
2(1):71–92. .
.Jablonkai, R. 2010. “English in the Context of European Integration: a Corpus-driven Analysis of Lexical Bundles in English EU Documents”.
English for Specific Purposes
29(4):253–267. .
.Jantunen, J. 2004. “Untypical Patterns in Translations. Issues on Corpus Methodology and Synonymity”. In
Translation Universals. Do They Exist?
A. Mauranen and P. Kujamäki (eds), 101–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins..
Kajzer-Wietrzny, M. 2012. “Interpreting Universals and Interpreting Style”. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland. Available at:[URL] [last accessed 11 August 2013].
Koehn, P. 2005. “Europarl: a Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation”. Paper presented as MT Summit 2005.
MartínezGuillem, S. 2009. “Argumentation, Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political Communication”.
Discourse and Society
20(6):727–746. .
.Nishina, Y. 2007. “A Corpus-driven Approach to Genre Analysis: the Reinvestigation of Academic, Newspaper and Literary Texts”.
ELR Journal
1(2). Available at: [URL] [last accessed 11 August 2013]
Paquot, M. and Granger, S. 2012. “Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora”.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
32:130–149. .
.Rasch, B.E. 2011. “Legislative Debates and Democratic Deliberation in Parliamentary Systems”. Paper presented at the Oslo-Yale International Workshop on Epistemic Democracy in Practice, Yale University, New Haven, 20–22 October 2011.
Scott, M. 2008.
WordSmith Tools version
51. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Simpson-Vlach, R. and Ellis, N.C. 2010. “An Academic Formulas List (AFL)”.
Applied Linguistics
31:487–512. .
.Sultan, A.H.J. 2011. “A Contrastive Study of Metadiscourse in English and Arabic Linguistics Research Articles”.
Acta Linguistica
5(1):28–41.
Tracy-Ventura, N., Biber, D. and Cortes, V. 2007. “Lexical Bundles in Spanish Speech and Writing”. In
Working with Spanish Corpora
, G. Parodi (ed), 217–231. London: Continuum.
Van Dijk, T.A. 2003. “Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates”.
Journal of Language and Politics
2:93–129. .
.Vinay, J.-P. and Darbelnet, J. 1995 [1958].
Comparative Stylistics of French and English. A Methodology for Translation
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wray, A. 2002.
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
.Xiao, R. 2010. “Idioms, Word Clusters, and Reformulation Markers in Translational Chinese: Can “Translation Universals” Survive in Mandarin?”
Proceedings of The International Symposium on Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies 2010 Conference (UCCTS2010)
. Available at: [URL] [last accessed 11 August 2013].
Zarei, G.R. and Mansoori, S. 2011. “A Contrastive Study on Metadiscourse Elements Used in Humanities vs. Non Humanities across Persian and English”.
English Language Teaching
4(1): 42–50..
Cited by (26)
Cited by 26 other publications
Szczygłowska, Tatiana
2024. We have to ensure that… A contrastive corpus-based analysis of English situation manipulators and their Polish translation equivalents. Lingua 302 ► pp. 103702 ff. 
Casal, J. Elliott & Jungwan Yoon
2023. Frame-based formulaic features in L2 writing pedagogy: Variants, functions, and student writer perceptions in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 71 ► pp. 102 ff.
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
2023. Proficiency at the lexis–grammar interface: Comparing oral versus written French exam tasks. Language Testing 40:3 ► pp. 658 ff.
Grabowski, Łukasz & Nicholas Groom
2022. Functionally-defined recurrent multi-word units in English-to-Polish translation. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Malá, Markéta, Denisa Šebestová & Jiří Milička
2021. The expression of time in English and Czech children’s literature. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101], ► pp. 283 ff.
Milička, Jiří, Václav Cvrček & Lucie Lukešová
2021. Modelling crosslinguistic n‑gram correspondence in typologically different languages. Languages in Contrast 21:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
Wang, Min & Yiqiong Zhang
2021. ‘According to…’: The impact of language background and writing expertise on textual priming patterns of multi-word sequences in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 61 ► pp. 47 ff.
Čermáková, Anna, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård & Sylvi Rørvik
2021. Time in languages, languages in time. In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101], ► pp. 1 ff.
Lake, William Michael & Viviana Cortes
2020. Lexical bundles as reflections of disciplinary norms in Spanish and English literary criticism, history, and psychology research. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 184 ff.
Malá, Markéta
2020. Functional Plurality of Language in Contextualised Discourse, ► pp. 109 ff.
Matte, Marine Laísa & Larissa Goulart
2020. Lexical Bundles across levels of Proficiency in Portuguese as a Second Language. Letras de Hoje 55:4 ► pp. e38377 ff.
Yoon, Jungwan & J. Elliott Casal
2020. P-frames and rhetorical moves in applied linguistics conference abstracts. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 282 ff.
Chlumská, Lucie
2018. Prominent POS-Grams and n-Grams in Translated Czech in the Mirror of the English Source Texts. In Taming the Corpus [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 99 ff.
Granger, Sylviane
2018. Tracking the third code. In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87], ► pp. 185 ff.
Dupont, Maïté & Sandrine Zufferey
2017. Methodological issues in the use of directional parallel corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell & Jarle Ebeling
2017. A functional comparison of recurrent word-combinations in English original vs. translated texts. ICAME Journal 41:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Oksefjell Ebeling, Signe & Jarle Ebeling
Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal
2017. Chapter 1. Lexis in contrast today. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff.
Esfandiari, Rajab & Fatima Barbary
2017. A contrastive corpus-driven study of lexical bundles between English writers and Persian writers in psychology research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 29 ► pp. 21 ff.
Hasselgård, Hilde
2017. Chapter 4. Lexical patterns of place in English and Norwegian. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 97 ff.
Hasselgård, Hilde
Čermáková, Anna & Lucie Chlumská
2017. Chapter 3. Expressing place in children’s literature. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 75 ff.
Granger, Sylviane & Marie-Aude Lefer
2016. From General to Learners’ Bilingual Dictionaries: Towards a More Effective Fulfilment of Advanced Learners’ Phraseological Needs. International Journal of Lexicography 29:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Grabowski, Łukasz
2015. Phrase frames in English pharmaceutical discourse: a corpus-driven study of intra-disciplinary register variation. Research in Language 13:3 ► pp. 266 ff.
Grabowski, Łukasz
2018. Chapter 3. Fine-tuning lexical bundles. In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82], ► pp. 57 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.