Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 14:2 (2014) ► pp.278–305

Contrasting the syntax and semantics of negative causation

The apparent similarity of Spanish and Portuguese

 | Ghent University (Belgium)
The main objective of this study is to compare the structure of the factitive construction expressing negative causation with dejar/deixar (“to let”) in Ibero-Romance languages. It is generally accepted that Portuguese and Spanish exhibit a high degree of syntactic equivalence. However, the nature of the infinitive in the two languages is quite different, displaying more verbal characteristics in Portuguese than in Spanish. By means of a detailed empirical study, this article examines whether this structural difference has an effect on the syntax of the causatives with deixar and dejar. Indeed, statistically the selection of the different complement types (finite clause vs. infinitive, with an anteposed or postposed causee) differs substantially in the two languages. A multifactorial analysis shows to what extent the degree of dynamicity of the main constituents, namely the causer, the causee and the caused event, determine the syntactic variation in the two languages and how this variation can be linked to the different grammatical status of the infinitive.
Keywords: causative verb, complementation pattern, infinitive, case marking, Portuguese/Spanish
Published online: 30 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.2.05eng
References (37)
Comrie, B. 1976. “The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences”. In The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus, M. Shibatani (ed), 261–312. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, R.J. 2002. Diccionario de Construcción y Régimen de la lengua castellana. Barcelona: Herder.Google Scholar
Enghels, R. 2009. “The syntactic position of the perceived participant as indicator of the internal structure of the Spanish and French infinitival complement”. Linguistics 47(3):759–791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enghels, R. and Roegiest, E. 2012. “Los verbos de causación negativa dejar y laisser: sintaxis y polisemia”. In Aspectualidad, transitividad, referencialidad. Las lenguas románicas en contraste, V. Bellosta von Colbe and M. García García (eds), 87–119. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, I. 1999. “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds), 1317–1393.Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1980. “The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements”. Studies of Language 4(3):333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Syntax. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hochster, A. 1978. “Order and degree of fusion in causative structures”. Glossa 121:39–57.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. and Verhagen, A. 1994. “The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events”. Cognitive Linguistics 51:115–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, R. 2007. “Soft causatives in Spanish”. In On interpreting Construction Schemas, N. Delbecque and B. Cornillie (eds), 229–260. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mensching, G. 2000. Infinitive constructions with specified subjects. A syntactic analysis of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. 1991. Reduced constructions in Spanish. PhD thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Espiñeira, M.J. 1999. “Problemas de interpretación sintáctica en cláusulas con dejar + infinitivo”. In Homenaxe ó profesor Camilo Flores, X.L. Couceito, et al. (eds), 306–331. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Roegiest, E. 1983. “Degrés de fusion dans la construction factitive des langues romanes”. In Verbe et phrase dans les langues romanes, E. Roegiest and L. Tasmowski (eds), 271–288. Gent: Romanica Gandensia.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Conceptualización y estructura argumental de la pasiva pronominal en español y en italiano”. In Cognición y percepción lingüísticas. Comunicaciones presentadas al VI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística Hispánica, vol. III, E. Serra and G. Wotjak (eds), 166–181.València/Leipzig: Universitat de València/Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Variación pronominal en español: el pronombre dativo entre sintaxis y semántica”. In Variación sintáctica en español: un reto para las teoríasde la sintaxis, G. Knauer, et al. (eds), 175–190. Tübingen, Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roegiest, E. and Enghels, R. 2009. “La posición de los clíticos en la factitiva española: un estudio comparativo hacer vs. dejar”. In El hispanismo omnipresente. Homenaje a Robert Verdonk, R. De Maeseneer, et al. (eds), 253–264. Brussel: Antwerp University Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, K. 2007. Prepositional infinitives in Romance: A usage-based approach to syntactic change. Studies in Historical Linguistics 31. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Silva, A. Soares da 1997. A semântica de deixar. PhD Thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
2003. “Image Schemas and Category Coherence: The Case of the Portuguese Verb Deixar”. In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, H. Cuyckens, et al. (eds), 281–322. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Imagery in Portuguese causation/perception constructions. Imagery in language”. In Festschrift in Honour of Professor Ronal W. Langacker, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and A. Kwiatkowska (eds), 297–319. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2005. “Revisitando as construções causativas e perceptivas em português: significado e uso”. In Actas do XX Encontro Nacional da Associaç.o Portuguesa de Linguística, I. Duarte and I. Leiria (eds), 855–874. Lisbon: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
2012. “Stages of grammaticalization of causative verbs and constructions in Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian.” Folia Linguistica 46(2):513–552.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1976. “The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus”. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 6, The grammar of causative constructions, M. Shibatani (ed), 1–40. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M. and Pardeshi, P. 2002. “The causative continuum”. In The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, M. Shibatani (ed), 85–125. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, G. and P. Wolff. 2004. “Linking Perceptual Properties to Linguistic Expressions of Causation”. In Language, Culture and Mind, M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds), 237–250. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1976. “Semantic causative types”. In The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus, M. Shibatani (ed), 43–116. New York/San Francisco/ London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol I. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Infinitivo y sujeto en portugués y español. Un estudio empírico de los infinitivos adverbiales con sujeto explícito. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. and Kemmer, S. 1997. “Interaction and causation: causative constructions in modern standard Dutch”. Journal of Pragmatics 271:61–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vesterinen, R. 2008. “Direct, indirect and inferred causation: finite and infinitive complements of deixar and fazer”. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7(1): 23–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “The relation between iconicity and subjectification in Portuguese complementation: complements of perception and causation Verbs”. Cognitive Linguistics 21(3):573–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L. 1985. “The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: the case of Romance causatives”. Linguistic Inquiry 161:247–289.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels
2023. From Motion to Causation: The Diachrony of the Spanish Causative Constructions with traer (‘Bring’) and llevar (‘Take’). Languages 8:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Enghels, Renata & Marie Comer
2020. Causative and inchoative constructions with poner and meter (‘to put’) in Spanish. In Changes in meaning and function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Kocher, Anna
2018. Epistemic and evidential modification in Spanish and Portuguese. Languages in Contrast 18:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Comer, Marie, Renata Enghels & Clara Vanderschueren
2016. Measuring the degree of near-synonymy of Spanish verbs of putting. Functions of Language 23:3 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.