Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 21:2 (2021) ► pp.250–274

Vocative melodies in Spanish and English

A cross-linguistic analysis

ORCID logo | West Virginia UniversityU.S.A.
This study aims to describe the melodic contours used in Spanish and English calling vocatives in order to identify cross-linguistic similarities and differences. Additionally, it also explores how the sociopragmatic factor of formality may condition contour choices in both languages. 18 speakers of Spanish and 18 speakers of English produced a total of 432 one-word vocatives in formal and informal situations. The analyses of the F0 contours revealed that, although Spanish and English share multiple melodies in this speech act (e.g. L+H* L%, L* H% and L+H* !H%), some tones are language-specific (e.g. L+H* HL% for Spanish). In addition, a General Linear Mixed Model confirmed that these contours are not equally attested in all contexts and that the formality of the situation can condition their use.
Keywords: vocatives, intonation, formality, sociopragmatics, English/Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.19023.rob
References (53)
References
Aguilar, L., De la Mota, C. and Prieto, P. 2009. Sp_ToBI. Training materials. Available at [URL]
Armstrong, M. E. 2010. Puerto Rican Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 155–189. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2012. The Development of yes-no Question Intonation in Puerto Rican Spanish. PhD Thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. and Baltazani, M. 2005. Intonational Analysis and Prosodic Annotation of Greek Spoken Corpora. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, S.-A. Jun (ed.), 84–117. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, A., Żygis, M. and Jaskuła, M. 2015. The Phonetics and Phonology of the Polish Vocative Chant. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, Scotland, 10–14 August 2015.Google Scholar
Astruc, L., Mora, E. and Rew, S. 2010. Venezuelan Andean Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 191–226. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Asher, N. and Reese, B. 2005. Negative Bias in Polar Questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, E. Maier, C. Bary and J. Huitink (eds), 30–43. Available at [URL]
Beckman, M. E., and Pierrehumbert, J. 1986. Intonational Structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 31: 255–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J. and Shattuck Hufnagel, S. 2005. The Original ToBI System and the Evolution of the ToBI Framework. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, S.-A. Jun (ed.), 9–54. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billmyer, K. and Varghese, M. 2000. Investigating Instrument-Based Pragmatic Variability: Effects of Enhancing Discourse Completion Tests. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 517–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. 2018. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Available at [URL] [last accessed 20 April 2018].
Borràs-Comes, J., Sichel-Bazin, R. and Prieto, P. 2015. Vocative Intonation Preferences are Sensitive to Politeness Factors. Language and Speech 58(1): 68–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandimonte, G. 2010. Breve estudio contrastivo sobre los vocativos en el español y el italiano actual. In Actas del XXI Congreso internacional de ASELE, J. S. Guervós, H. Bongaerts, J. J. S. Iglesias and M. S. Gómez (eds), 249–262. Salamanca: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Winter, B., Idemaru, K. and Grawunder, S. 2014. Phonetics and Politeness: Perceiving Korean Honorific and Nonhonorific Speech through Phonetic Cues. Journal of Pragmatics 661: 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrera Abreu, M. and Vizcaíno Ortega, F. 2010. Canarian Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 87–121. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 2007. Incredulity Questions. Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 11). Rovereto, Italy, 30 May – 1 June 2007. 133–140.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2006. How Language Works. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
De la Mota, C., Butragueño, P. M. and Prieto, P. 2010. Mexican Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 319–350. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, E. and Prieto, P. 2010. Castilian Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 17–48. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. 2010. Data Collection Methods in Speech Act Performance: DCTs, Role Plays, and Verbal Reports. In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical, and Methodological Issues, E. U. Juán and A. Martínez-Flor (eds), 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S. and Prieto, P. (eds) 2015. Intonational Variation in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., Cruz, M., Fernandes-Svartman, F., Collischonn, G., Fonseca, A., Serra, C., Oliveira, P. and Vigário, M. 2015. Intonational Variation in Portuguese: European and Brazilian Varieties. In Intonational Variation in Romance, S. Frota and P. Prieto (eds), 235–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, C., Feldhausen, I., Pesková, A., Colantoni, L., Lee, S., Arana, V. and Labastía, L. 2010. Argentinian Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 285–317. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Grawunder, S., Oertel, M. and Schwarze, C. 2014. Politeness, Culture, and Speaking Task – Paralinguistic Prosodic Behavior of Speakers from Austria and Germany. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Speech Prosody (Speech Prosody 2014). Dublin, Ireland, 20–23 May 2014. 159–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, M., Baumann, S. and Benzmüller, R. 2005. German Intonation in Autosegmental-Metrical Phonology. In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, S.-A. Jun (ed.), 55–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N. and García-Amaya, L. 2012. Transcription of Jerezano Andalusian Spanish Intonation. Estudios de Fonética Experimental 211: 109–162.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Navarro, A. 2019. Sistema y uso de la entonación española. Aproximación interactivo-funcional. Santiago: Universidad Alberto Hurtado Ediciones.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. and Prieto, P. 2015. Intonational Variation in Spanish: European and American Varieties. In Intonational Variation in Romance, S. Frota and P. Prieto (eds), 350–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Towards an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 7(1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübscher, I., Borràs-Comes, J. and Prieto, P. 2017. Prosodic Mitigation Characterizes Catalan Formal Speech: The Frequency Code Reassessed. Journal of Phonetics 651: 145–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janson, T. 2013. Vocative and the Grammar of Calls. In Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, B. Sonnenhauser and P. Noel Aziz Hanna (eds), 219–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R. 1978. Stylized Intonation. Language 541: 517–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980. The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2008 [1996]. Intonational Phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. 1979. The Intonational System of English. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
López-Bobo, M. J. and Cuevas-Alonso, M. 2010. Cantabrian Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 49–58. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E. 2010. Ecuadorean Andean Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 227–253. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ortiz, H., Fuentes, M. and Astruc, L. 2010. Chilean Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 255–283. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. and Roseano, P. (eds). 2010. Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Robles-Puente, S. 2014. Prosody in Contact: Spanish in Los Angeles. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
2017. Read! On the Intonational Properties of Short Imperatives in Spanish. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 29(1): 163–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a. Sociopragmatic Factors and Melodic Patterns: Spanish Vocatives and Imperatives Compared. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12(1): 179–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b. Transferencia y erosión de patrones melódicos en bilingües de español e inglés en California. Boletín de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 54(1): 279–302.Google Scholar
Shin, S. 2005. Grammaticalization of Politeness: A Contrastive Study of German, English and Korean. PhD Thesis, University of California (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, B. and Noel Aziz Hanna, P. (eds). 2013. Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Válková, S. 2004. Politeness as a Communicative Strategy and Language Manifestation (A Cross-Cultural Perspective). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.Google Scholar
Willis, E. 2002. Is there a Spanish Imperative Intonation Revisited: Local Considerations. Linguistics 401: 347–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Dominican Spanish Intonation. In Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, P. Prieto and P. Roseano (eds), 123–153. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Winter, B. and Grawunder, S. 2012. The Phonetic Profile of Korean Formality. Journal of Phonetics 401: 808–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatnar Moe, M. 2010. Register Shifts in Translations of Popular Fiction from English into Slovene. In Why Translation Studies Matter, D. Gile, G. Hansen and N. K. Pokorn (eds), 125–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. 1974. Hey, whatsyourname! In Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, M. La Galy, R. Fox and A. Bruck (eds), 787–801.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Grünke, Jonas, Bistra Andreeva, Christoph Gabriel & Mitko Sabev
2023. Vocative Intonation in Language Contact: The Case of Bulgarian Judeo-Spanish. Languages 8:4 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.