References (39)
References
Atkins, B. T. S. 2008. Then and now: Competence and Performance in 35 Years of Lexicography. In Practical Lexicography: A Reader, T. Fontenelle (ed.), 247–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkins, B. T. S., Rundell, M. and Sato, H. 2003. The Contribution of FrameNet to Practical Lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 333–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. 2001. Frame Semantics as a Framework for Describing Polysemy and Syntactic Structures of English and German Motion Verbs in Contrastive Computational Lexicography. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference (CL 2001). Lancaster, England, 29 March – 2 April 2001. 64–73.Google Scholar
2005. Semantic Frames as Interlingual Representations for Multilingual Lexical Databases. International Journal of Lexicography 18(4): 445–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Computational Resources: FrameNet and Constructicon. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, B. Dancygier (ed.), 549–573. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020a. A Roadmap towards Determining the Universal Status of Semantic Frames. In New Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics. Empirical and Methodological Challenges, R. Enghels, B. Defrancq and M. Jansegers (eds), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b. Constructions in English Grammar. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts, A. McMahon and L. Hinrichs (eds), 277–297. Oxford: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrus, L. (2006). Building a Resource for Studying Translation Shifts. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006). Genoa, Italy. European Language Resources Association. 1240–1245.Google Scholar
. 2018. A Frame-Semantic Approach to Co-Occurrence Patterns: A Lexicographic Study of English and Greek Motion Verbs. International Journal of Lexicography 31(4): 420–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. From Corpus Usages to Cognitively Informed Dictionary Senses: Reconstructing an MLD Entry for the Verb float . Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX 6(2): 75–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Motivated Patterns of Phrasal Verbs and Learner’s Dictionaries. Lexis [Online] 191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, J. and Oksefjell Ebeling, S. 2013. Patterns in Contrast. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enghels, R., Defrancq, B. and Jansegers, M. 2020. Reflections on the Use of Data and Methods in Contrastive Linguistics. In New Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics. Empirical and Methodological Challenges, R. Enghels, B. Defrancq and M. Jansegers (eds), 1–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. and Petruck, M. 2003. Framenet Glossary. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 359–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Th. and Härtl, H. 2020. Goal Prevalence and Situation Types: An Empirical Analysis of Differences in Greek and German Motion Event Descriptions. In Contrastive Studies in Morphology and Syntax, M. Georgiafentis, G. Giannoulopoulou, M. Koliopoulou and A. Tsokoglou (eds), 262–280. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. 2014. The many Uses of run: Corpus Methods and Socio-Cognitive Semantics. In Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, D. Glynn and A. J. Robinson (eds), 117–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A. and Wong, J. 2016. ‘Walking’ and ‘running’ in English and German: The Conceptual Semantics of Verbs of Human Locomotion. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14(2): 303–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. 2011. Meaning Arises from Words, Context, and Phrasal Constructions. Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4): 317–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th. 2006. Corpus-Based Methods and Cognitive Semantics: The many Senses of to run . In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, St. Th. Gries and A. Stefanowitsch (eds), 57–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P. 2013a. Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. English and American II: Synchronic Lexicography. In Dictionaries. An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography. Supplementary Volume: Recent Developments with Focus on Electronic and Computational Lexicography, R. H. Gouws, U. Heid, W. Schweickard and H. E. Wiegand (eds), 720–730. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. How Context determines Meaning. In Computational Phraseology, G. Corpas Pastor and J. P. Colson (eds), 297–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022. Corpus Pattern Analysis. CPA Project Page. [URL] [last accessed 2 August 2022].
Hanks, P., Maarouf, I. E. and Oakes, M. 2018. Flexibility of Multiword Expressions and Corpus Pattern Analysis. In Multiword Expressions: Insights from a Multilingual Perspective, M. Sailer and S. Markantonatou (eds), 93–119. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. and Stavrou, M. 2007. Grammaticalized Aspect and Spatio-Temporal Culmination. Lingua 1171: 605–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Divjak, D. and Rakhilina, E. (2010). Aquamotion Verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A Case Study in Lexical Typology. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. Hasko and R. Perelmutter (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2021. Standard and Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, W. Xu and J. Taylor (eds), 191–203. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oksefjell Ebeling, S. and Ebeling, J. 2020. Contrastive Analysis, Tertium Comparationis and Corpora. Nordic Journal of English Studies 19(1): 97–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. and Gleitman, L. 2002. Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The Representation of Motion in Language and Cognition. Cognition 841: 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. 2021. Conceptual Metonymy Theory Revisited. Some Definitional and Taxonomic Issues. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, W. Xu and J. Taylor (eds), 204–227. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R. and Scheffczyk, J. 2016. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. [URL] [last accessed 2 August 2022).
Sinclair, J. 1998. The Lexical Item. In Contrastive Lexical Semantics, E. Weigand (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. 1996. Two Ways to travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, M. Shibatani and S. Thompson (eds), 195–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soroli, E. and Verkerk, A. 2017. Motion Events in Greek: Methodological and Typological Issues. CogniTextes 6(1): 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. and Papadopoulou, D. 2009. Aspect and the Interpretation of Motion Verbs in L2 Greek. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins, N. Snape, Y. I. Leung and M. S. Smith (eds), 187–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar