Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 8:2 (2008) ► pp.287–293

On identifiability and definiteness in English and German

An example of contrastive information structure analysis

 | University of Wuppertal (Germany)
Published online: 12 December 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.8.2.08the
References (34)
References
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., Stavrou, M. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, K. 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007. “Focus Structure, Movement to spec–Foc and Syntactic Processing”. Schwabe and Winkler. 2007. 255–274.Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. 1993. “Article and no Article”. Anglistik & Englischunterricht 491: 13–24.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ebert, K. H. 1982. “The Definite Articles with Inalienables in English and German.” In The Contrastive Grammar of English and German, W. F. W. Lohnes and E. A. Hopkins (eds), 64–75. Ann Arbor (MI): Karoma.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W. and Van Valin Jr., R. D. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1994 [1892/1962]. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung”. In Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien, 7th edn., G. Patzig (ed), 40–65. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. 1980. “Accented Subjects in ‘All–New’ Utterances”. In Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, G. Brettschneider and C. Lehmann (eds), 449–461. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gallmann, P. 2005. “Die flektierbaren Wortarten” [Excluding section “Das Verb”]. In: Duden: Die Grammatik. 2005. 7th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag. 146–394.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., Zacharsky, R. 1993. “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse”. Language 69(2): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H., Johansson, S., Behrens, B., Fabricius-Hansen, C. (eds). 2002. Information Structure in a Cross–linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidolph, K. E., Flämig, W., Motsch, W. 1981. Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Heim, I. 1988. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V. 2007. Understanding English–German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. 1972. “Functional Sentence Perspective: A Case Study from Japanese and English”. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 269–320.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. (ed). 1976. Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. 1964 [1928]. “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. In A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, J. Vachek (ed), 59–67. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sasse, H. -J. 1987. “The Thetic/Categorical Distinction Revisited”. Linguistics 251: 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds) 2007. On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: Generalizations across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siepmann, D. 2001. “Determinants of Zero Article Use with Abstract Nouns: A Corpus–informed Study of Journalistic and Academic English.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 49(2): 105–120.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A. 1978. “Modern English from a Typological Point of View: Some Implications of the Function of Word Order”. Linguistische Berichte 541: 19–35.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R. D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C. 1995. “Reference as a Universal Cognitive Process: A Contrastive Study of Article Use.” In Reference in Multidisciplinary Perspective: Philosophical Object, Cognitive Subject, Intersubjective Process, R. A. Geiger (ed), 315–352. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Zifonun, G. and Hoffmann, L. and Strecker, B. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Vol. 31. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zotter, H. 1977. “Häufige Fehler in Englischarbeiten II”. Moderne Sprachen 21(3–4): 38–46.Google Scholar