Chapter 7
Temporal prominence demotion in updating imparfait uses in
L’Étranger
We investigate certain time updating uses of the
French Imparfait in Camus’
L’Étranger which express ongoing eventualities
but also update narrative time. Our focus lies on progressives with
narrative features without an explicit marking of the update. We
apply the prominence-based temporal account of Becker & Egetenmeyer (2018) and
concentrate on the level of relations between time points. Using
this approach, we determine the prominence value of the reference
points the imparfaits introduce. In the described uses, the
prominence value is demoted to minimally prominent within its
domain. This has important consequences for the temporal structure
of the passage they occur in as the prominence demoted reference
point is not available as an anchor for following temporal updates.
A comparison with two Spanish translations of
L’Étranger supports our analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Time updating uses of the imparfait
- 3.A prominence-based account on the interrelations between
times
- 4.Studies carried out concerning time updating imparfait uses in
L’Étranger
- 5.The progressive with narrative features without explicit marking
in L’Étranger
- 6.The progressive with narrative features with explicit
marking
- 7.Further evidence: Comparison with the Spanish translation
- 8.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
-
Corpus
References
Altshuler, D.
(
2010)
Temporal
interpretation in narrative discourse and event internal
reference. PhD
dissertation, New Brunswick: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Asher, N. et al.
(
1995)
De
l’espace-temps dans l’analyse du
discours.
Semiotique 9, 11–62 (online
edition:
[URL], p. 1–47).
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A.
(
2003)
Logics
of Conversation. Cambridge et al. Cambridge University Press.
Balibar, E.
(
1972)
Le
passé composé fictif dans L’Étranger d’Albert
Camus.
Littérature, 7, 102–119.
Banfield, A.
(
1982)
Unspeakable
Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of
Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Paul.
Bary, C. L.
(
2009)
Aspect
in Ancient Greek. A Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and
Imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (= PhD
dissertation).
Beauchemin, Yves
(
1981)
Le Matou. Montreal: Québec Amérique.
Becker, M., & Egetenmeyer, J.
(
2018)
A
prominence-based account of temporal discourse
structure.
Lingua, 214, 28–58.
Benveniste, É.
(
1966)
Problèmes
de linguistique
générale. Paris: Gallimard (=
Bibliothèque
des sciences humaines).
Berthonneau, A.-M., & Kleiber, G.
(
1999)
Pour
une réanalyse de l’imparfait de rupture dans le cadre de
l’hypothèse anaphorique
méronomique.
Cahiers de
praxématique [En
ligne], 32, 119–166;
[URL]
Bertinetto, P. M.
(
1986)
Tempo,
aspetto e azione nel werbe italiano. Il sistema
dell’indicativo. Firenze: L’Accademia della Crusca.
Bres, J.
(
2005)
L’imparfait
dit
narratif. Paris: CNRS Éditions (=
Collection
sciences du langage).
Bu, J.
(
2016)
A
semantic study of tense backshift and its literary effects
in FID.
Journal of Literary
Semantics 45 (1), 49–75.
Cabillau, J.-F.
(
1971)
L’expression
du temps dans “L’Étranger” d’Albert
Camus.
Revue belge de
philologie et
d’histoire, 49(3), 866–874.
Caudal, P., & Vetters, C.
(
2005)
Que
l’imparfait n’est pas (encore) un
prétérit. In
P. Larrivée, &
E. Labeau (Eds.),
Nouveaux
Développements de
l’imparfait (pp. 45–77). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi (=
Cahiers
Chronos 14).
van Dijk, T.
(
1982)
Episodes
as units of discourse
analysis. In
D. Tannen (Ed.),
Georgetown
University Roundtable on Languages &
Linguistics (pp. 177–195). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Doron, E.
(
1991)
Point
of view as a factor of
content. In
S. K. Moore, &
A. Z. Wyner (Eds.),
Proceedings
of the 1st Semantics and Linguistic Theory
Conference (pp. 51–64). Linguistic Society of America.
Egetenmeyer, J.
Submitted
a).
Temporal relations of
free indirect discourse
events.
Egetenmeyer, J.
Submitted
b).
Time updating uses of
the French imparfait extending across
genres.
Eggermont, C.
(
2010)
L’étrange
Passé Composé dans “L’Étranger” d’Albert
Camus.
Romaneske, 35(4), 16–22. [Preprint
version]
Genette, G.
(
1980)
Narrative
Discourse. An Essay in
Method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Grobe, E. P.
(
1967a)
An
exemplary case of the French “imparfait de
durée”.
Romance
Notes, 9(1), 152–156.
Grobe, E. P.
(
1967b)
Passé
simple versus imparfait.
The
French
Review, 41(3), 344–356.
Guéron, J.
(
2015)
Subjectivity
and Free Indirect
Discourse. In
J. Guéron (Ed.),
Sentence
and
Discourse (pp. 256–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press (=
Oxford
Studies in Theoretical
Linguistics).
Himmelmann, N., & Primus, B.
(
2015)
Prominence
beyond prosody – a first
approximation. In
A. De Dominicis (Ed.),
pS-prominenceS:
Prominences in
Linguistics (pp. 38–58). Proceedings
of the International
Conference, Viterbo: DISUCOM Press.
Hinterwimmer, S.
(
2017)
Two
kinds of perspective taking in narrative
texts. In
D. Burgdorf et al. (Eds.),
Proceedings
of the 27th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT
27), 282–301.
Jasinskaja, K., & Karagjosova, E.
Forthcoming).
Rhetorical
Relations. In
L. Matthewson et al. Eds.
The
Companion to
Semantics Oxford Wiley
Jones, M. A.
(
1996)
Foundations
of French
syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (=
Cambridge textbooks
in linguistics).
Kamp, H.
(
2013)
Deixis
in discourse. Reichenbach on temporal
reference. In
K. von Heusinger &
A. ter Meulen (Eds.),
Meaning
and the Dynamics of
Interpretation (pp. 105–159). Leiden: Brill (=
Current
Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface
29).
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U.
(
1993)
From
discourse to logic. Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics
of natural language, formal logic and Discourse
Representation
Theory. Pt. 2. Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers (=
Studies in
Linguistics and Philosophy
42).
Kamp, H., & Rohrer, C.
(
1983)
Tense
in
texts. In
R. Bäuerle,
C. Schwarze, &
A. von Stechow (Eds.),
Meaning,
use, and interpretation of
language (pp. 250–269). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Kamp, H., van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U.
(
2011)
Discourse
Representation
Theory. In
D. M. Gabbay, &
F. Guenthner (Eds.),
Handbook
of Philosophical Logic, 2nd
ed., vol. 15, (pp. 125–394). Dordrecht et al.: Springer.
Klein, W.
(
1994)
Time
in
Language. London: Routledge.
Labeau, E.
(
2004)
Le(s)
temps du compte rendu
sportif.
Journal of French
Language
Studies 14, 129–148.
Labelle, M.
(
2003)
Events,
states and the French
imparfait. In
Y. Roberge, &
A. T. Pérez Leroux (Eds.),
Romance
Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition: Selected Papers from
the 32nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL),
Toronto, April
2002, (pp. 165–180). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Landeweerd, R.
(
1998)
Discourse
semantics of perspective and temporal
structure. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (= PhD
dissertation).
Lhafi, S. C.
(
2012)
Zum
Plusquamperfekt im Französischen und Spanischen. Kontrastive
Untersuchung aus textlinguistischer
Perspektive. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.
Molendijk, A.
(
1990)
Le
passé simple et l’imparfait: une approche
reichenbachienne. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Molendijk, A.
(
2005)
The
Imparfait of French and the Past Progressive of
English. In
B. Hollebrandse,
A. van Hout, &
C. Vet (Eds.),
Crosslinguistic
perspectives on tense, aspect and
modality (pp. 119–129). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi (=
Cahiers
Chronos 13).
Molendijk, A., et al.
(
2004)
Meaning
and use of past tenses in
discourse. In
F. Corblin, &
H. de Swart (Eds.),
Handbook
of French
Semantics (pp. 271–308). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Patard, A.
(
2010)
L’imparfait
en voie de « prétérisation » ? Quelques éléments de
réflexion.
Travaux du Cercle
Belge de
Linguistique 5, 1–15.
Polanyi, L.
(
1988)
A
formal model of the structure of
discourse.
Journal of
Pragmatics, 12(5–6), 301–638.
Reichenbach, H.
(
[1947] 1956)
Elements
of Symbolic Logic. New York et al.: Macmillan.
Sartre, J.-P.
(
[1943]
1947)
Explication de
L’Étranger
. In
J.-P. Sartre (Ed.),
Situations
I (pp. 99–121). Paris, Gallimard.
Smith, C.
(
2003)
Modes
of Discourse. The Local Structure of
Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Swart, H.
(
2001)
Discourse
properties of the Perfect and related tenses in French,
English, and Dutch.
Groninger
Arbeiten zur Germanistischen
Linguistik, 44, 195–212.
de Swart, H.
(
2007)
A
cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the
Perfect.
Journal of
Pragmatics, 39(12), 2273–2307.
Tasmowski-De Ryck, L.
(
1985)
L’imparfait
sans et avec rupture.
Langue
française, 67(3), 59–77.
Corpus
Base
textuelle
FRANTEXT
, ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine.
[URL]. Version:
December 2016.
Camus, A.
(
1942)
L’Étranger. Paris: Gallimard.
Valente
(
2005) =
Camus, A. (2005)
El
extranjero. Traducción
de
José Ángel Valente. Madrid: Alianza Editorial / Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.
Del Carril
(
2013) =
Camus, A. (2013)
El
extranjero. Traducción
de
Bonifacio Del Carril. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Astrid De Wit, Frank Brisard, Carol Madden-Lombardi, Michael Meeuwis & Adeline Patard
2024.
Beyond Aspectual Semantics,
Egetenmeyer, Jakob
2023.
The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto andmientras+ Imperfecto.
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 16:1
► pp. 63 ff.
Egetenmeyer, Jakob
2024.
The The time updating imperfecto in Spanish.
Moenia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.