Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 6:1 (2020) ► pp.80–103

Tempo and affect in the Linguistic Landscape

| Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts

While the role of time and emotion have been acknowledged in linguistic and semiotic landscapes research, the particular qualities of tempo and affect have rarely been discussed directly. This case study from an Italian-American festival in South Philadelphia, a diverse and changing urban neighborhood, demonstrates how the two qualities work together to influence the discursive construction of identity for residents as they interact with the space. Ethnographic observation and photographs from the two days of the festival, as well as interviews with locals, frame the discussion of how to explore the landscape through this lens. The paper encourages researchers to devote more attention to the abstract qualities of landscapes, and serves as a starting point for critical examinations of a place and the distribution of capital among its occupants.

Keywords: affect, ephemeral landscapes, Italian-American, language and identity, Philadelphia, semiotic landscapes, South Philly, tempo, urban diversity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Tempo, affect and belonging in the Italian Market
  • 3.Ethnography in flux
  • 4.The role of discourses
  • 5.Outside the Festival: Everyday tempos, power and borders
  • 6.After affect: The opinions of residents
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.00018.nie
References
Aronin, L., & Ó Laoire, M.
(2013) The material culture of multilingualism: moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 225–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, P.
(2005) Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo – a diachronic look at the linguistic landscape. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2005 (175–176), 103–121.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen
(2007) Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, J.
(1994) Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(2007) Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural pragmatics, 4(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, L.
(2004) Locating identity politics. In Keith, M. & Pile, S. (eds.). Place and the Politics of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cronin, A. M.
(2006) Advertising and the metabolism of the city: urban space, commodity rhythms. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 24.4(2006): 615–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saint-Georges, I.
(2004) Materiality in discourse: The influence of space and layout in making meaning. In LeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (eds.). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
DiPilla, M.
(2016) South Philadelphia’s Little Italy and 9th Street Italian Market. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing.Google Scholar
Duff, C.
(2010) On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 28.5(2010): 881–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hult, F. M.
(2009) Language ecology and linguistic landscape analysis. In Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (eds.). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 88–104). Routledge.Google Scholar
Iedema, R.
(2003) Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual communication, 2(1), 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
(2010) Introducing semiotic landscapes. In ibid. (eds.). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(2008) Mysteries of the substrate. In Meyerhoff, M. & Nagy, N. (eds.). Social lives in language-Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luconi, S.
(2001) From paesani to white ethnics: The Italian experience in Philadelphia. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, B.
(2002) Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peck, A., & Banda, F.
(2014) Observatory’s linguistic landscape: semiotic appropriation and the reinvention of space. Social semiotics, 24(3), 302–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pile, S.
(2010) Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubdy, R.
(2015) Conflict and exclusion: The linguistic landscape as an arena of contestation. In Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp. 1–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saverino, J.
(2010) Mapping Memories in Stone: Italians and the Transformation of a Philadelphia Landscape. In Takenaka, A. & Osirim, M. J. (eds.). Global Philadelphia: Immigrant Communities Old and New. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R.
(1998) Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
(2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the material world. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, S. W.
(2004) Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
(2007) Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seals, C. A.
(2011) Reinventing the linguistic landscape of a national protest. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle, 21(1), 190–202.Google Scholar
Shouse, E.
(2005) Feeling, emotion, affect. M/c journal, 8(6), 26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
(2008) Chronic everyday life: Rhythmanalysing street performance. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(7), 807–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. C.
(1988) Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanger-Ross, J.
(2010) Staying Italian: Urban Change and Ethnic Life in Postwar Toronto and Philadelphia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S.
(2009) Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C., & Jegels, D.
(2014) Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2014(228), 179–199.Google Scholar
Troyer, R. A., & Szabó, T. P.
(2017) Representation and videography in linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 3(1), 56–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y. F.
(1977) Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
United Merchants of the S. 9th Business Association
(2018) The South 9th Street Italian Market Festival. Retrieved July 18, 2018 from [URL]
Wee, L.
(2016) Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2 (2), 105-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Huebner, Thom
2021. Diaspora and Asian spaces in a transnational world. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.