Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 7:1 (2021) ► pp.86–115

Memories and semiotic resources in place-making

A case study in the Old Quarter in Hanoi, Vietnam

ORCID logo | La Trobe University
This paper explores how semiotic resources are used to build individuals’ place-making during a walk around the Old Quarter in Hanoi, Vietnam. Using Lefebvre’s (1991) spatial triad as the perceived, the lived and the conceived, the paper uses a case study of a local participant and myself to consider how our differing perspectives affect place-making. I show how the local resident makes meaning using perceived resources in the here-and-now as backdrops for the lived, presented via his recounting of memories of activity spaces. I then contrast how these memories differ from the researcher’s place-making, where the conceived affects how I perceive the significance of visual resources on signs in the here-and-now. The study shows the value of Lefebvre’s (1991) triad for explaining the conflicting generalisations researchers have made about the nature of what is seen in the linguistic landscape or about the roles played by linguistic landscape in defining place.
Keywords: place-making, local resident, memories, activity spaces
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Place-making in LL research
  • 3.Theoretical framework: The conceptual triad by Lefebvre (1991)
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1The research setting
    • 4.2Research participants
    • 4.3Data collection
    • 4.4Data analysis
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Mapping Khanh’s walk
    • 5.2Talk associated with personal attachment
    • 5.3Talk not associated with personal attachment
  • 6.Discussion & conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19005.pha
References (48)
References
Abas, S. (2019). Cosmopolitanism in ethnic foodscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 5(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 52–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Z., & Stroud, C. (2019). Zombie landscapes: Apartheid traces in the discourses of young South Africans. In A. Peck, C. Stroud, & Q. Williams (Eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes (pp. 11–28). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casey, E. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short space of time. In S. Feld, & K. Basso (Eds.) Senses of place (School of American research advanced seminar series) (pp. 13–52). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Chmielewska, E. (2010). Semiosis takes place or radical uses of quaint theories. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp. 274–291). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2012). How to conduct case study research. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Research methodologies in second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, J., & Sidorova, L. (2018). What language advertises: Ethnographic branding in the linguistic landscape of Yakutsk. Language Policy, 17(1), 23–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvin, R. T. (2010). Responses to the linguistic landscape in Memphis, Tennessee: An urban space in transition. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp. 235–251). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2020). Theoretical development of linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape, 6(1), 16–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Y., & Wu, X. (2019). Language policy, linguistic landscape and residents’ perception in Guangzhou, China: Dissents and conflicts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, L. (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2017). Monument as semiotic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 3(2), 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hult, F., & Kelly-Holmes, H. (2019). Spectacular language and creative marketing in a Singapore tailor shop. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(1), 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2004). Culture on the ground: The world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 315–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanza, E., & Woldemariam, H. (2014). Indexing modernity: English and branding in the linguistic landscape of Addis Ababa. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(5), 491–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1974).Google Scholar
(2002). Critique of everyday life volume II: Foundations of a sociology of the everyday (J. Moore, Trans.). London: Verso. (Original work published 1961).Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J. (2001). Viet Nam: Quoc ngu, colonialism and language policy. In N. Gottlieb & P. Chen (Eds.), Language planning and language policy: East Asian perspectives (pp. 159–206). Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Lou, J. J. (2016). The linguistic landscape of Chinatown: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Spaces of consumption and senses of place: A geosemiotic analysis of three markets in Hong Kong. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 513–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, D. (2009). Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multimodal-performative view. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 107–125). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1), 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Localizing the transdisciplinary in practice: A teaching account of a prototype undergraduate seminar on linguistic landscape. L2 Journal, 8(4), 100–117. Retrieved from [URL]
Manan, S. A., David, M. K., Dumanig, F. P., & Naqeebullah, K. (2015). Politics, economics and identity: Mapping the linguistic landscape of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modan, G. (2007). Turf wars: Discourse, diversity, and the politics of place. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, X. N. C. M., & Nguyen, V. H. (2019). Language education policy in Vietnam. In A. Liddicoat & R. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 185–201). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papen, U. (2012). Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens’ protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1), 56–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2019). Linguistic landscape and semiotic assemblages. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 75–88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phan, N., & Starks, D. (2020). Language in public space and language policies in Hanoi Old Quarter, Vietnam: A dynamic understanding of the interaction. Language Policy, 191, 111–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarvaglieri, C., Redder, A., Pappenhagen, R., & Brehmer, B. (2013). Capturing diversity: Linguistic land- and soundscaping. In J. Duarte & I. Gogolin (Eds.), Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas: Research approaches (pp. 45–74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, B. K. (2019). The scarf, language, and other semiotic assemblages in the formation of a new Chinatown. Applied Linguistics Review, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2019). Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates and future directions. In M. Pütz & N. Mundt (Eds.), Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource (pp. 25–37). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Starks, D., & Phan, N. (2019). An exploration of stasis and change: A park in the Old Quarter Hanoi as a palimpsest. Social Semiotics, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C., & Jegels, D. (2014). Semiotic landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014(228), 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 301, 128–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 25–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trumper-Hecht, N. (2010). Linguistic landscape in mixed cities in Israel from the perspective of ‘walkers’: The case of Arabic. In E. Shohamy, E. Ben-Rafael, & M. Barni (Eds.), Linguistic landscape in the city (pp. 235–251). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Jerry W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, H., Techasan, S., & Huebner, T. (2020). A new Chinatown? Authenticity and conflicting discourses on Pracha Rat Bamphen Road. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabrodskaja, A. (2014). Tallinn: Monolingual from above and multilingual from below. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014(228), 105–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2017). Unstructured interviews. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 239–247). California: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Carolin Schneider & Seraphim Alvanides
2023. Towards a taxonomy of arguments for and against street renaming. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.