Part of
Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and TeachingEdited by John M. Norris and Lourdes Ortega
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 13] 2006
► pp. 133–164
Edited by John M. Norris and Lourdes Ortega
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 13] 2006
► pp. 133–164
4. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar
A meta-analysis of the research
Cited by
Cited by 45 other publications
Alhumaid, Anwar
2023. Exploring EFL female teachers' and undergraduate students' perceptions regarding written corrective feedback. Saudi Journal of Language Studies 3:3 ► pp. 144 ff. 
Amiruddin, Syahrun Adzim, Anwar Sadat Malik & Nurhidayanti Badru
2022. Interactional Feedback on English Proficiency: Grammatical Awareness. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review 1:3 ► pp. 433 ff.
BABANOĞLU, M. Pınar, Reyhan AĞÇAM & Nebahat BADEM
2018. Yükseköğretimde Yabancı Dil Eğitiminde Açık ve Örtük Yazılı Düzeltici Geribildirim: Türkiye Örneği. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 19:3 ► pp. 104 ff.
Chapelle, Carol A., Jonathan Schmidgall, Alexis Lopez, Ian Blood, Jennifer Wain, Yeonsuk Cho, Amy Hutchison, Hye‐Won Lee & Ahmet Dursun
2018. Designing a Prototype Tablet‐Based Learning‐Oriented Assessment for Middle School English Learners: An Evidence‐Centered Design Approach. ETS Research Report Series 2018:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Chaudhuri, Tushar, Renia Lopez-Ozieblo & Valérie Martinez
2022. Enhanced Language Use Through from Peer and Teacher Feedback, Self-directed Learning and Interaction in the Target Language. In Integrated Language Learning & Social Awareness: Research and Practice [SpringerBriefs in Education, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
Cornillie, Frederik, Ruben Lagatie, Mieke Vandewaetere, Geraldine Clarebout & Piet Desmet
2013. Tools that detectives use: in search of learner-related determinants for usage of optional feedback in a written murder mystery. CALICO Journal ► pp. 22 ff.
Maedeh Davari
2022. Online Reformulation and Collaborative Feedback: Its Effect on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance during the COVID-19
Pandemic. International Journal of Research in English Education 7:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Dubetz, Nancy & Jennifer Collett
2020. Studying Program Effectiveness in Preparing Teachers for English Learners. Action in Teacher Education 42:3 ► pp. 190 ff.
Ebadijalal, Marjan & Nouroddin Yousofi
2023. The impact of mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL learners’ speaking performance and anxiety: does language make a difference?. The Language Learning Journal 51:1 ► pp. 112 ff.
Evans, Norman W., K. James Hartshorn, Robb M. McCollum & Mark Wolfersberger
2010. Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 14:4 ► pp. 445 ff.
Fujii, Akiko, Nicole Ziegler & Alison Mackey
2016. 2. Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 63 ff.
Gamallo Otero, Pablo, Marcos Garcia, Iria del Río & Isaac González López
2015. Avalingua. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70], ► pp. 35 ff.
Gledo, Đejlana
2024. Corrective feedback in EFL Classroom Interaction: A Qualitative Study Among Third Grade Students at an International High School. MAP Education and Humanities ► pp. 1 ff.
Goo, Jaemyung, Gisela Granena, Yucel Yilmaz & Miguel Novella
2015. Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 48], ► pp. 443 ff.
Gómez Argüelles, Lizbeth, Edith Hernández Méndez & Moisés D. Perales Escudero
2019. EFL Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 21:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Ha, Xuan Van & Loc Tan Nguyen
2021. Targets and Sources of Oral Corrective Feedback in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms: Are Students' and Teachers' Beliefs Aligned?. Frontiers in Psychology 12
HARTSHORN, K. JAMES, NORMAN W. EVANS, PAUL F. MERRILL, RICHARD R. SUDWEEKS, DIANE STRONG‐KRAUSE & NEIL J. ANDERSON
2010. Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 44:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
HEIFT, TRUDE
2010. Prompting in CALL: A Longitudinal Study of Learner Uptake. The Modern Language Journal 94:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Heift, Trude & Anne Rimrott
2008. Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL. System 36:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Kachinske, Ilina, Peter Osthus, Katya Solovyeva & Mike Long
2015. Implicit learning of a L2 morphosyntactic rule, and its relevance for language teaching. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 48], ► pp. 385 ff.
Keck, Casey & YouJin Kim
Kim, Hyunwoo, Tae Eun Kim & Jeeyoung Park
2022. The cognitive construction-grammar approach to teaching the Chinese Ba construction in a foreign language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Ko, Kyoungrok
2011. Grammar versus Content: KFL/ESL Teachers' Trends in Feedback on College Student Writing. The Korean Language in America 16:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Ko, Kyoungrok
2011. Grammar versus Content: KFL/ESL Teachers' Trends in Feedback on College Student Writing. The Korean Language in America 16:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Li, Huiling
2023. A Review on Corrective Feedback Research of the Recent 20 Years. International Journal of Education and Humanities 9:3 ► pp. 190 ff.
Loncar, Michael, Wayne Schams & Jong-Shing Liang
2023. Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015-2019. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4 ► pp. 722 ff.
Meurers, Detmar, Kordula De Kuthy, Florian Nuxoll, Björn Rudzewitz & Ramon Ziai
2019. Scaling Up Intervention Studies to Investigate Real-Life Foreign Language Learning in School. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39 ► pp. 161 ff.
Mifka-Profozic, Nadia
2015. Effects of corrective feedback on L2 acquisition of tense-aspect verbal morphology. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Mifka-Profozic, Nadia
2022. Recasts versus clarification requests: The relevance of linguistic target, proficiency, and communicative ability. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:3 ► pp. 855 ff.
Pawlak, Mirosław
2013. The Effect of Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback on Eliminating Pronunciation Errors. In Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-native Speakers [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 85 ff.
Renner, Julia
2015. Oral Corrective Feedback: Examining Teacher- Initiated Correction of CFL (Chinese as a Foreign Language) Learners’ Pronunciation Errors. Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies 7:1 ► pp. 197 ff.
Saeli, Hooman & An Cheng
2021. Discrepancies in Teachers’ Perceptions and Reported Practices: The Case of Written Feedback in an EFL Context. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Sato, Masatoshi & Susan Ballinger
2016. Understanding peer interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 1 ff.
Shin, Hye Won
2022. Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Sun, Yiou & Ping Wang
2022. Data Visualization and Analysis in Second Language Research. Frontiers in Psychology 13
TAMERER, Rabiye Bahar
2019. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in an EFL classroom. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi 2:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Tan, Xiaochen, Barry Lee Reynolds & Xuan Van Ha
2022. Oral corrective feedback on lexical errors: a systematic review. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Teixeira, Joana
2021. Chapter 9. Can explicit instruction help L2 learners overcome persistent L1 interference?. In L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 65], ► pp. 230 ff.
Tsvilodub, Polina, Esther Chevalier, Vera Klütz, Tobias Oberbeck, Kristina Sigetova & Frederik Wollatz
2023. Improving a Gamified Language Learning Chatbot Through AI and UX Boosting. In Innovative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 581], ► pp. 557 ff.
Vuogan, Alyssa & Shaofeng Li
2023. A systematic review of meta-analyses in second language research: current practices, issues, and recommendations. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
Vásquez, Camilla & Jane Harvey
2010. Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research 14:4 ► pp. 421 ff.
Wisniewski, Benedikt, Klaus Zierer & John Hattie
2020. The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Zerva, Irini K.
2023. Metalinguistic abilities: The contribution to writing. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8:1 ► pp. 100609 ff.
ÇIRAKLI, M. Zeki & Hasan SAĞLAMEL
2020. An Examination of the Psychology of the Feedback Receiver: The Case of EFL Students. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 6:2 ► pp. 678 ff.
ŞENDOĞAN, Kübra, Mukaddes ÇOBAN, Dilay İşık KİRİŞCİ, Simay ULUSCU & Mustafa POLAT
2019. The Effect of Explicit Feedback in Oral Performance in Use of Past Tense. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 6:2 ► pp. 35 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.