Cover not available
Part of
Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 319–348

12. How adolescents use social discourse to open space for language learning during peer interactions

| University of Maryland
| University of Maryland
| University of Maryland
| University of Maryland

This chapter investigates how adolescents learning English and Spanish mediated two-way language learning opportunities during their interactions in a language exchange program in one high school. Drawing upon sociocultural theory and interactional ethnography, we examined moment-to-moment discourse to identify language-related episodes (LREs) and discursive moves of social inquiry, solidarity, and support. Findings revealed how adolescent peers mediated each other’s learning using relationship-building discourse. This chapter contributes to interactional research in SLA by revealing how students construct comity in their interactions with peers, and how their discourse may afford opportunities for co-construction of knowledge and second language learning. We consider the pedagogical implications of recognizing social discourse as a tool to expand language learning among peers.

Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.13mar
References
Atkinson, D
(2010) Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, G
(1993) Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Introduction. In G. Aston (Ed.), Negotiating service (pp. 1–23). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.Google Scholar
Ballinger, S
(2013) Towards a cross-linguistic pedagogy: Biliteracy and reciprocal learning strategies in French immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 131–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballinger, S., & Lyster, R
(2011) Student and teacher language use in a two-way Spanish/English immersion school. Language Teaching Research, 15, 289–306.Google Scholar
Block, D
(2003) The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, M.P
(2001) Overt participation and covert acquisition in the language classroom. In M.P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 112–140). Harlow, UK: Longman Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S
(2011) Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. Modern Language Journal, 95, 401–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castanheira, M.L, Crawford, T., Dixon, C.N, & Green, J.L
(2001) Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castanheira, M.L, Green, J., Dixon, C., & Yeagerb, B
(2007) (Re) Formulating identities in the face of fluid modernity: An interactional ethnographic approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 172–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, M
(1996) Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W.A
(1981) Entering the child’s world: Research strategies for field entry and data collection in a preschool setting. Ethnography and language in educational settings, 117–146.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C
(2005) Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalistic classroom discourse: Directives in content-and-language-integrated classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1275–1293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R
(2004) Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y
(1987) Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J
(2007) Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 800–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Ohta, A.S
(2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, O
(2009) Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P
(2005) Interactional strategies for interlanguage communication: Do they provide evidence for attention to form? In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 383–405). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, W.H
(1985) Habitations of the word: Essays. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Gass, S.M, & Selinker, L
(2008) Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K
(2010) Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1971) Relations in public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, K
(2008) Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly,43(2), 148–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J
(Ed.) (1982a) Language and social identity (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1982b) Discourse strategies (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J
(Ed.) (1986) The social construction of literacy (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.J
(1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, E
(1992) Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ivanič, R
(1994) I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, D.E
(2009) Standpoints: Researching and teaching English in the digital dimension. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 8–22.Google Scholar
Kowal, M., & Swain, M
(1997) From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion Education: International Perspectives (pp. 284–309). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J
(2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G.N
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., & Pastrana, A
(2013) CLIL students’ communicative functions across activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(A), 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Titchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Porter, P
(1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A
(2007) Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S.M, & McDonough, K
(2000) How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J
(2007) Interaction research: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin-Beltrán, M
(2010) Positioning proficiency: How students and teachers (de)construct language proficiency at school. Linguistics and Education. 21(4), 257–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) I don’t feel as embarrassed because we’re all learning: Discursive positioning among adolescents becoming multilingual. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 152–161 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) “What do you want to say?” How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moje, E.B., Ciechanowski, K.M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T
(2004) Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, L
(2010) Mobilizing culture, language, and educational practices: Fulfilling the promises of Mendez and Brown. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 451–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naughton, D
(2006) Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A.S
(2000) Re-thinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pica, T
(1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H
(2010) Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouhshad, A & Storch, N
(2016) A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B
(1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, M
(2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2012) Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R
(2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spradley, J.P
(1980) Participant observation.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Storch, N
(2002a) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A
(2002) Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Deters, P
(2007) “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 820–836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 285–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 101–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titscher, S., Wodak, R., Meyer, M., & Vetter, E
(2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: SageGoogle Scholar
van Lier, L
(1998) The relationship between consciousness, interaction, and language learning. Language Awareness, 7, 128–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J.V
(1985) Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L
(1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Erlam, Rosemary, Jenefer Philp & Diana Feick
2021. Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners, DOI logo
Feick, Diana & Antonie Alm
2021. Gruppenarbeit in Zeiten der sozialen Isolation: Zur Nutzung und Wahrnehmung von Breakout-Räumen. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 48:5 ► pp. 516 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
King, Kendall A., Martha Bigelow & Abdiasis Hirsi
2017. New to School and New to Print: Everyday Peer Interaction Among Adolescent High School Newcomers. International Multilingual Research Journal 11:3 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Kos, Tomas
2023. Exploring peer support among young learners during regular EFL classroom lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Lehrer, Nadine
2023. The classroom as relationship: experience, interconnectedness, and pathways to critical thought. Food, Culture & Society 26:3 ► pp. 814 ff. DOI logo
Martin-Beltrán, Melinda, Natalia L. Guzman & Tabitha Kidwell
2019. Building a community of practice to counter the marginalisation of adolescent language learners. Language, Culture and Curriculum 32:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Martin‐Beltrán, Melinda, Andrés A. García & Angélica Montoya‐Ávila
2020. “I Know There's Something Like That in Spanish”: Heritage Language Learners' Multifaceted Interactions with Linguistically Diverse Peers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 530 ff. DOI logo
Peeters, Ward
2019. The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations. Education and Information Technologies 24:5 ► pp. 3177 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Sippel, Lieselotte
2020. German Learners' Beliefs About Peer Interaction and Peer Feedback. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 53:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe
2019. Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.