Cover not available
Part of
Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 105–124

Genre and appraisal in CLIL history texts

Developing the voice of the historian

 | Saint Louis University
 | Autonomous University of Madrid
This chapter offers a perspective on texts written in a CLIL class, highlighting the role of the interpersonal meanings covered by the appraisal framework (Martin & White 2005) in constructing the different genres of history, which are not only factual, but also include assigning value and indicating point of view. An analysis of appraisal in an 11,000-word longitudinal corpus of CLIL secondary student writing shows how texts are more or less successful in their selection of features from the Appraisal systems as they respond to prompts, the higher-rated texts creating a more appropriate voice for the genre (Coffin 2006). Awareness of the categories of interpersonal meanings can allow teachers to make genre expectations explicit, helping improve student writing.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The framework applied: Genre, appraisal and the voice of the historian
    • School genres
    • Appraisal
    • The voices of the historian
  • The texts, their evaluation and analysis
    • The texts
    • Expert holistic rating of the texts
    • Appraisal analysis
  • Learning to deploy appraisal resources and create different voices: Some evidence
    • Attitude
    • Engagement
  • Conclusion and implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.07mcc
References (50)
References
Acevedo, C. (2010). Will the implementation of Reading to Learn in Stockholm schools accelerate literacy learning for disadvantaged students and close the achievement gap? A report on school-based action research. Multilingual Research Institute, Stockholm Education Administration. Available at <[URL]>
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Speech acts, genres and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In C. Bazerman, & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 309–339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Breidbach, S., & Viebrock, B. (Eds.). (2013). CLIL in Europe: Research perspectives on policy and practice. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bunch, G., & Willet, K. (2013). Writing to mean in secondary school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 141–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Content-based instruction and CLIL: Moving forward in the 21st century. Special issue of Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1). 8–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Christie, F., & Martin, J.R. (Eds.). (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. (2002). The voices of history: Theorising the interpersonal semantics of historical discourses. TEXT, 22(4), 503–528.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Reconstruals of the past – Settlement or invasion? The role of judgement analysis. In J. R. Martin, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value (pp. 219–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (Eds.). (2014). Content and language integrated learning. Special issue of Language Learning Journal, 42(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Knowing and writing school history. The language of students’ expository writing and teachers’ expectations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, L. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Eggins, S., Wignell, P., & Martin, J.R. (1993). The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 75–109). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
European Commission (1995). White paper on teaching and learning: Towards the learning society. Available at <[URL]>
Eurydice (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice. Available at <[URL]>
Foucault, M. (1980). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 51–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 339–424). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J.R. (Eds.). (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
INEE Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. (2012). Estudio europeo de la competencia lingüistica. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte/MECD.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (Eds.). (2007). Diverse contexts – Converging goals: CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy – Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3–39). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
(2002). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. In M. Schleppegrell, & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 87–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003). Making history: Grammar for interpretation. In J. R. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value (pp. 19–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 578–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M. (2008). Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume) (pp. 13–16). Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). Theorizing advancedness: Setting up the research agenda. In L. Ortega, & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 281–300). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (2009). Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 151–166). London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Reading to learn: Implementation and outcomes of the professional learning program. Report for the Western NSW Region, NSW Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
(2014). Reading to learn: Accelerating learning and closing the gap. Sydney: Reading to Learn. Available at <[URL]>
Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez Catalán, R. (Eds.). (2009). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & Oteiza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 174–187.Google Scholar
Swain, E. (2007). Constructing an effective ‘voice’ in academic discussion writing: An appraisal theory perspective. In A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell, & R. Whittaker (Eds.), Language and literacy. Functional approaches (pp. 166–184). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010). Getting engaged: Dialogistic positioning in novice academic discussion writing. In E. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 291–317). Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Veel, R. (2006). The Write it Right project: Linguistic modelling of secondary school and the workplace. In R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches (pp. 66–92). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Veel, R., & Coffin, C. (1996). Learning to think like an historian: The language of secondary school history. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 191–231). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. TEXT, 23(2), 259–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Llinares, Ana & Tarja Nikula
2024. CLIL students’ production of cognitive discourse functions: Comparing Finnish and Spanish contexts. Language and Education 38:3 ► pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Julia Hüttner & Ana Llinares
2022. CLIL in the 21st Century. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio, Yvette Coyle & Vanessa García
2022. The effects of using cognitive discourse functions to instruct 4th-year children on report writing in a CLIL science class. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12:4 ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo
Whittaker, Rachel & Anne McCabe
2020. Chapter 13. Writing on history in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) context. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Whittaker, Rachel & Anne McCabe
2023. Expressing evaluation across disciplines in primary and secondary CLIL writing: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:3 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.