Cover not available
Part of
Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman
Edited by Lourdes Ortega and ZhaoHong Han
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 48] 2017
► pp. 143–162

Chapter 7
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 pedagogy

Lessons to be learned

 | University of Groningen
If we assume that language is a complex adaptive system, the learner is a complex adaptive system, and the teaching and learning is a dynamic process – in which all relevant cognitive, physical, and social systems interact over time – then we must attend to all these systems and their relevant sub-systems when we evaluate existing or newly created pedagogical models. Even though details may have changed over the last two decades since Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) was introduced in SLA, the approach has implicitly or explicitly always viewed language itself as form-meaning-use mappings at all levels, and language learning and language teaching as dynamic processes. In this chapter I reflect on the main insights offered by CDST on L2 teaching and explore explicitly the links to Complexity and Dynamic Systems Theory, ending with a list of practical implications for good practices in language classrooms.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Language from a dynamic usage based view: The what of language teaching
  • Language teaching from a DUB perspective: The how of teaching
  • Beyond CLT: DUB instruction
  • Effective teaching approaches: From CLIL to FLIL
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.08ver
References (50)
References
Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385–403). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ermann, B. & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29–62.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, N. T. P. (2013). A dynamic usage-based approach to second language teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irshad, M. (2015). Second language development through the lens of a dynamic usage-based approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Palo Alto, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In Peter Robinson & Nick Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66–88). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Tsai, M. -H. (forthcoming). L2 developmental education and systemic theoretical instruction: The case of English verb-noun collocations. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26(1), 125–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Consensus and divergence on the content, role, and process of teaching grammar. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 1991: Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art, 158–165.Google Scholar
(1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141–165.Google Scholar
(2000). Second language acquisition and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 165–181.Google Scholar
(1995). On the teaching and learning of grammar: Challenging the myths. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham & Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy. (pp. 131–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle/Cengage.Google Scholar
(2012). On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this volume). Complexity Theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B., MacNeilage, P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1983). Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals. Linguistics, 21(1), 181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 377–93). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65(1), 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 163–199). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Rousse-Malpat, A. & Verspoor, M. (2012). Measuring effectiveness in focus on form versus focus on meaning. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2). 263–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, D. (2011). The birth of a word [Video file]. TED2011. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smiskova, H. (2013). Chunks in L2 development: A usage-based perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Smiskova, H., Verspoor, M. & Lowie, W. (2012). Conventionalized ways of saying things (CWOSTs) and L2 development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 210–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tilma, C. (2014). The dynamics of foreign versus second language development in Finnish writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen/University of Jÿvaskyla.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. In R. Siegler & D. Kuhn (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 73–174). Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. & Boers, F. (2013). Cognitive linguistics of second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics (pp. 698–705). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Xu, X. (2015). The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 4–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. & Hong, N. T. P. (2013). A dynamic usage-based approach to communicative Language Teaching. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1). 22–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Phuong Nguyen, H. T. (2015). Dynamic usage-based approach to second language teaching. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 305–328). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S. & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. & Tyler, A. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 160–174). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Rousse-Malpat, Audrey, Lise Koote, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Marjolijn Verspoor
2024. Parlez-vous francais? Effects of structure-based versus dynamic-usage-based approaches on oral proficiency. Language Teaching Research 28:5 ► pp. 1893 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2024. Usage‐Based Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Vis‐à‐Vis Data‐Driven Learning. TESOL Quarterly 58:3 ► pp. 1235 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Di, Hyangeun Ji & Dominique Kliger
2023. Stealth Assessment in Game-Based and Task-Based Language Teaching. In Games as Stealth Assessments [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Najimdeen, Hakeem Alade & Ismail Hussein Amzat
2023. Establishing DST and Push-Pull Theory for Internationalization Best Practices in Higher Education. In Global Perspectives on the Internationalization of Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Korvesi, Evgenia & Marije Michel
2022. Chatting with Your Peers across Modalities: Effects of Performing Increasingly Complex Written Computer-Mediated Tasks on Oral L2 Development. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Little, David
2022. Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching 55:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Nicholas, Howard, Manfred Pienemann & Anke Lenzing
2022. Teacher decision-making, dynamical systems and processability theory. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 6:2 DOI logo
Wang, Xiaochen, Fei Sun, Qikai Wang & Xinyu Li
2022. Motivation and affordance: A study of graduate students majoring in translation in China. Frontiers in Education 7 DOI logo
Chang, Pengyun & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. A CDST Perspective on Variability in Foreign Language Learners’ Listening Development. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2021. Usage-based instruction, systems thinking, and the role of Language Mining in second language development. Language Teaching 54:4 ► pp. 502 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2023. In English Medium Instruction you can walk and chew gum. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
KLIESCH, MARIA & SIMONE E. PFENNINGER
2021. Cognitive and Socioaffective Predictors of L2 Microdevelopment in Late Adulthood: A Longitudinal Intervention Study. The Modern Language Journal 105:1 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Kyle, Kristopher, Scott Crossley & Marjolijn Verspoor
2021. MEASURING LONGITUDINAL WRITING DEVELOPMENT USING INDICES OF SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY AND SOPHISTICATION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4 ► pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Bülow, Lars, Hannes Scheutz & Dominik Wallner
2019. Variation and change of plural verbs in Salzburg’s base dialects. In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Irshad, Mufeeda, Merel Keijzer, Martijn Wieling & Marjolijn Verspoor
2019. Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Sántha-Malomsoki, Ágnes & Kálmán Sántha
2019. Students’ Beliefs on Classroom Didactics of Second Language Teaching in the 21st Century. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 11:2 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Taniguchi, Kazumi
2019. Language Acquisition: A Systemic View from Cognitive Linguistics. In A Systems Approach to Language Pedagogy [Translational Systems Sciences, 17], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Textbook English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 116], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.