Abeywickrama, P.
(2013) Why not non-native varieties of English as listening comprehension test input? RELC Journal, 44(1), 5974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adank, P., Evans, B., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S.
(2009) Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 520–529.Google Scholar
Ahn, S.
(1987) Sandhi-variation and affective factors as input filters to comprehension of spoken English among Korean learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D.
(1995) Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, R., & Mislevy, R.
(1999) Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 223–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almond, R., Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., Yan, D., & Williamson, D.
(2015) Bayesian networks in educational assessment. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almond, R., Mulder, J., Hemat, L. A., & Yan, D.
(2009) Bayesian network models for local dependence among observable outcome variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(4), 491–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C.
(2010) Redefining multicompetence for bilingualism and ELF. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 95–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
(2014) Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Kohler, K.
(1988) The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38(4), 561–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antes, T.
(1996) Kinesics: The value of gesture in language and in the language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 439–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J.
(1984) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audacity [Computer software]
(2013) Retrieved from: [URL]
Bachman, L. F.
(2004) Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baltova, I.
(1994) The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(3), 507–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K. J., & Adank, P.
(2015) Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2015–2024DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, K., Brooks, L., Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(2013) Test-takers’ strategic behaviors in independent and integrated speaking tasks. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 304–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batty, A. O.
(2015) A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning. Language Testing, 32(1), 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) The impact of visual cues on item response in video-mediated tests of foreign language listening comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
Bax, S.
(2011) TextInspector. Retrieved from: [URL] (15 November, 2011)
Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J.
(2000) TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berne, J. E.
(1995) How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania, 78(2), 316–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, G. T.
(1989) Towards an understanding of overseas students’ difficulties in lectures: A phenomenographic approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 13, 85–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blau, E.
(1990) The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 746–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) More on comprehensible input: The effect of pauses and hesitation markers on listening comprehension. Paper presented at Puerto Rico TESOL, San Juan, Puerto Rico. (ED 340234).
Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S. C., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S.
(2010) What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension (Technical Report No. TTO 81434 E.3.1). College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Center for Advanced Study of Language. Retrieved from: [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, A. N., Wayland, S. C., Blodgett, A., & Linck, J.
(2011) Factors related to passage length: Implications for second language listening comprehension, CogSci 2001 Proceedings: 2317–2322Google Scholar
Bond, T., & Fox, C.
(2015) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonk, W. J., & Ockey, G. J.
(2003) A many-facet Rasch analysis of the L2 group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosker, H., Pinget, A.-F., Quene, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N.
(2012) What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed, and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosker, H., Quene, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N.
(2014) The perception of fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 64(3), 579–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J. D.
(1976) Current research on an integrative test of English grammar. RELC Journal, 7(2), 30–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. A.
(2010) The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. & Bent, T.
(2008) Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brazil, D.
(1997) The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brett, P.
(1997) A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System, 25(1), 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, L.
(2003) Converting an observation checklist for use with the IELTS speaking test. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 11, 20–21.Google Scholar
(2009) Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing 26(3), 341–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.
(1991) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. In A. Brown (Ed.), Teaching English pronunciation: A book of readings (pp.211–224). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003) Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., Iwashita, N., & McNamara, T.
(2005) An examination of rater orientations and test-taker performance on English-for-Academic-Purposes speaking tasks (TOEFL Monograph Series MS-29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G.
(1995) Speakers, listeners, and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G.
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D.
(2001) Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2012) New ways in teaching connected speech. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Hilferty, A.
(1986) Listening for reduced forms. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 759–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) The effectiveness of teaching reduced forms for listening comprehension. In J. D. Brown & K. Kondo-Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers (pp.51–58). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T.
(2002) Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Kondo-Brown, K.
(2006a) Introducing connected speech. In J. D. Brown and K. Kondo-Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers (pp.1–16). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
(2006b) Testing reduced forms. In J. D. Brown & K. Kondo-Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers (pp.247–264). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Brunfaut, T. & Révész, A.
(2013) Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 31–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunfaut, T., & McCray, G.
(2015) Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study. (ARAGs Research Reports – Online. Vol. 1, No. 1). London: British Council. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Buck, G.
(1988) Testing listening comprehension in Japanese university entrance examinations. JALT Journal, 10, 15–42.Google Scholar
(1990) The testing of second language listening comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
(1991) The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8(1), 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, J. K.
(1994) Non-verbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp.344–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1987) Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camtasia Studio 8 [Computer software]
(2013) Retrieved from: [URL]
Canagarajah, S.
(2006) Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, M. D., Mannell, R. H., & Dunn, P. K.
(2011) Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews? Language Testing, 28(2), 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, N. T.
(2011) Designing and analyzing language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M.
(1997) Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C.
(1987) Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp.83–100). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Celce Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J.
(1994) Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen, (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp.35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1985) Linguistics differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. Olson, D. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy language and learning (pp.105–123), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, J.
(2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. C. -S., & Read, J.
(2006) The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 375–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C., Enright, M., & Jamieson, J.
(2008) Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Choi, I., & So, Y. S.
(2016) A measurement model for integrated language assessment tasks. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Palermo, Italy.Google Scholar
Choi, I. -C., Kim, S., & Boo, J.
(2003) Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20(3), 295–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, M.
(2007) Listening placement test development and analysis from a Rasch perspective. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (3264845)Google Scholar
(2014) The use of semi-scripted speech in a listening placement test for university students. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 3(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
Coetzee-Van Rooy, S.
(2006) Integrativeness: Untenable for World Englishes learners? World Englishes, 25(3/4), 437–450. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 112(1): 155–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
(2013) <[URL]
Coniam, D.
(2001) The use of audio or video comprehension as an assessment instrument in the certification of English language teachers: A case study. System, 29(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. J.
(1992) Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, J.
(2011) Comprehending news videotexts: The influence of the visual content. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2), 44–68.Google Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
(2015) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 814–837. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A.
(2014) Gimson’s Pronunciation of English (8th ed.). Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(2004) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cubilo, J.
(2017) Video-mediated listening passages and typed note-taking: Examining their effects on examinee listening test performance and item characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Honolulu HI.Google Scholar
Cubilo, J., & Winke, P.
(2013) Redefining the L2 listening construct within an integrated writing task: Considering the impacts of visual-cue interpretation and note-taking. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(4), 371–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara, T.
(1999) Studies in language testing: Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Day, R.
(2003) Authenticity in the design and development of materials. In W. A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology and materials design in language teaching (pp.1–11). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J.
(2012) Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(2), 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D.
(1997) Testing speaking ability in academic contexts: Theoretical considerations (TOEFL Monograph Series, Number 8). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A.
(2009) Assessing paired orals: Raters’ orientation to interaction. Language Testing 26(3), 423–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, P.
(1991) Computerized testing of nonparticipatory L2 listening comprehension proficiency: An ESL prototype development effort. Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 64–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckes, T.
(2015) Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement: Analyzing and evaluating rater-mediated assessments (2nd ed.). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Services
(2009) The official guide to the TOEFL test. [URL]
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
(1972) Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive moments. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Non-verbal communication (pp.297–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1973) The expressive behavior of the deaf-and-blind born. In M. von Cranach & I. Vine (Eds.), Social communication and movement. (pp.163–193). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eiken Foundation of Japan
(2014) Retrieved from: [URL]
Eisentein, M. R., & Berkowitz. D.
(1981) The effect of phonological variation on adult learner comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(1), 75–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V.
(1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P.
(1972) Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ekong, P.
(1982) On the use of an indigenous model for teaching English in Nigeria. World Language English, 1, 87–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., & Davies, A.
(2006) Assessing English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 282–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., & Harding, L.
(2008) Language testing and English and an international language: Constraints and contributions. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elkhafaifi, H.
(2005) The effect of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 505–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., & Wilson, J.
(2013) Context validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening (Studies in Language Testing Vol. 35). (pp.152–241). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ethnologue
(2013) <[URL]
Field, J.
(2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2013a) The assessment of listening proficiency in Trinity tests of spoken interaction: Guidelines for examiners. Internal research report, Trinity College London.Google Scholar
(2013b) Cognitive validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening (Studies in Language Testing Vol. 35). (pp.77–151). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. P.
(1992) Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L.
(1997) The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, K.
(2006) An evolutionary approach to understanding nonverbal communication. In V. L. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp.139–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, J.
(1995) The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freedle, R., & Kostin, I.
(1999) Does the text matter in a multiple-choice test of comprehension? The case for the construct validity of TOEFL’s minitalks. Language Testing, 16(1), 2–32.Google Scholar
Frost, K., Elder, C., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2012) Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test takers’ oral performances. Language Testing, 29(3), 345–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, G.
(2003) Testing second language speaking. New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
(2010) Practical language testing. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F.
(2007) Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulcher, J. S.
(1942) “Voluntary” facial expression in blind and seeing children. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), 38(272).Google Scholar
Galaczi, E.
(2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in Paired Tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5): 553–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M.
(1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2000) Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B.
(2014) Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B.
(1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science, 7, 457–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GEPT
(2013) The General English Proficiency Test: Offering insight into learners’ English ability. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. & Taylor, L.
(Eds.) (2013) Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening (Studies in Language Testing Vol. 35). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, A.
(2004) A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 363–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) “I Prefer Not Text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (revised by Cruttenden, A.
) (2001) Gimson’s pronunciation of English (6th ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ginther, A.
(2002) Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goh, C. C.
(1998) How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F.
(1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R.
(1991) The paradox of comprehensible input: Hesitation phenomena in L2 teacher talk. JALT Journal, 13(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
(1992) Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruba, P.
(1993) A comparison study of audio and video in language testing. JALT Journal, 15(1), 85–88.Google Scholar
(1994) Design and development of a video-mediated test of communicative proficiency. JALT Journal, 16(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
(1997) The role of video media in listening assessment. System, 25(3), 335–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The role of digital video media in second language listening comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Gu, L., & So, Y.
(2015) Voices from stakeholders: What makes an academic English test ‘international’? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 18, 9–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guariento, W., & Morley, J.
(2001) Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U.
(2007) Foreign accent. In C. Müller (Ed.), Speaker classification: Fundamentals, features, and methods (pp.75–87). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. D.
(2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1985) Spoken and written Language. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hamid, M. O.
(2014) World Englishes in international proficiency tests. World Englishes, 33(2), 263–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. & Davies, A.
(2008) The Englishes of English tests: Bias revisited. World Englishes, 27(1), 26–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harding, L.
(2011) Accent and listening assessment. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2012) Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Communicative language testing: Current issues and future research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(2), 186–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrichsen, L.
(1984) Sandhi-variation: A filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 34(3), 103–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, S. S.
(2004) The effects of video and captioned text and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities on second language listening comprehension in a multimedia learning environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York University, NY. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Herron, C., & Seay, I.
(1991) The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 487–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilsdon, J.
(1995) The group oral exam: Advantages and limitations. In J. Alderson & B. North (Eds.), Language testing in the 1990s: The communicative legacy (pp.189–197). Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Hughes, A.
(2003) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge English.Google Scholar
Inoue, C., & Nakatsuhara, F.
(2014) Trinity College London Integrated Skills in English (ISE): Speaking and listening – Phase 3 pilot analysis. Internal research report, Trinity College London.Google Scholar
Ito, Y.
(2001) Effect of reduced forms on ESL learners’ input-intake process. Second Language Studies, 20(1), 99–124.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Current perspectives on teaching World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B.
(1986) The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native English. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.Google Scholar
Kang, O.
(2010a) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) Salient prosodic features on judgments of second language accent. Speech Prosody. [URL]Google Scholar
(2012) Impact of rater characteristics on ratings of international teaching assistants’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(3), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Moran, M.
(2014) Pronunciation features in non-native speakers’ oral performances. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 176–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Pickering, L.
(2014) Using acoustic and temporal analysis for assessing speaking. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (pp.1047–1062). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L.
(2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M.
(2015) Intelligibility of different varieties of English. ETS unpublished report.
Kang, O., Thomson, R. & Moran, M.
(2018) Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension of tests. Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelch, K.
(1985) Modified input as an aid to comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 81–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, S.
(1992) ‘I see what you mean’: The role of kinesic behaviour in listening and implications for foreign and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 239–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P.
(2008) Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 459–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T.
(2004) Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kmiecik, K., & Barkhuizen, G.
(2006) Learner attitudes towards authentic and specially prepared listening materials: A mixed message? TESOLANZ Journal, 14, 1–15.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Denes, M.
(2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2):45–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koyama, D., Sun, A., & Ockey, G.
(2016) The effects of item preview on video-based multiple-choice listening assessments. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 148–165.Google Scholar
Kurasaki, K. S.
(2000) Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P.
(2000) A course in phonetics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. K.
(2002) Raising students’ awareness of the features of real-world listening input. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. (pp.248–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J.
(2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A.
(2002) A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests (Studies in Language Testing Vol. 14). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H., & Winke, P.
(2013) The differences among three-, four-, and five-option-item formats in the context of a high-stakes English-language listening test. Language Testing, 30(1), 99–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. -W.
(2006) Dependability of scores for a new ESL speaking assessment consisting of integrated and independent tasks. Language Testing, 23(2), 131–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M.
(2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 369–377DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, R., & Mislevy, R. J.
(2004) Specifying and refining a measurement model for a computer-based interactive assessment. International Journal of Testing, 4(4), 333–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linacre, J. M.
(1989) Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Structure in Rasch residuals: Why principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12, 636.Google Scholar
(2002) Facets, factors, elements and levels. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 880.Google Scholar
(2010) User’s guide to Winsteps: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Author.Google Scholar
Londe, Z. C.
(2009) The effects of video media in English as a second language listening comprehension tests. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
Lunn, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D.
(2000) Winbugs – A bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10(4), 325–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T.
(2008) Teaching second language listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C.
(2002) The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Testing the effects of regional, ethnic and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(1), 37–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D.
(2006) Culture and nonverbal behavior. In V. L. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp.219–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuzawa, T.
(2006) Comprehension of English reduced forms by Japanese business people and the effectiveness of instruction. In J. D. Brown & K. Kondo-Brown, (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers (pp.59–66). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
May, L.
(2011) Interactional competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(1), 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M.
(2010) Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal, 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R.
(1995) Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp.51–75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McCray, G.
(2013) Assessing inter-rater agreement for nominal judgement variables. Paper presented at the Language Testing Forum. Nottingham 1517 November.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. F.
(1996) Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Messick, S.
(1989) Validity (3rd ed.). In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp.13–103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1995) Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3) 242–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mevada, S., & Shah, S.
(2015) Visuals and their effect in listening comprehension. ELT Voices – India, 5(1), 25–34.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
(1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J., Senturk, D., Almond, R., Dibello, L. V., Jenkins, F., Steinberg, L. S., & Yan, D.
(2002) Modeling conditional probabilities in complex educational assessments (CSE technical report 580). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The foundations of accent and itelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44(3), 316–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L.
(2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F.
(2012) The relationship between test-takers’ listening proficiency and their performance on the IELTS Speaking test. In L. Taylor & C. J. Weir (Eds.), IELTS Collected Papers 2: Research in reading and listening assessment (pp.519–573). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Trinity College London Integrated Skills in English (ISE) ‘The Interview’: Reviewing speaking rating criteria and rating procedures. Internal research report, Trinity College London.Google Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F., & Field, J.
(2012) A study of examiner interventions in relation to the listening demands they make on candidates in the GESE exams, Internal research report, Trinity College London.Google Scholar
Nastasi, B. K.
(1999) Audiovisual methods in ethnography. In J. J. Schensul, M. D. LeCompte, B. K. Nastasi, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews, and elicitation techniques (pp.1–50). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Nissan, S., DeVincenzi, F., & Tang, K. L.
(1996) An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension (Research Report No. RR-95-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Nitta, R., & Nakatsuhara, F.
(2014) A multifaceted approach to investigating pre-task planning effects on paired oral test performance. Language Testing, 31(2): 147–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NVivo 10 [Computer software]
(2013) Retrieved from: [URL]
Ockey, G. J.
(2007) Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24(4), 517–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) The effects of group members’ personalities on a test taker’s L2 group oral discussion test score. Language Testing 26(2), 161–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Item response theory. In G. Fulcher, & F. Davidson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of language testing (pp.316–328). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013) Assessment of listening. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
(2014) The potential of the L2 group oral to elicit discourse with a mutual contingency pattern and afford equal speaking rights in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockey, G. J., & French, R.
(2016) From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 693–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockey, G. J., & Li, Z.
(2015) New and not so new methods for assessing oral communication. Language Value, 7(1) 1–21. Castelló, Spain: Jaume I University ePress. [URL]Google Scholar
Ockey, G. J., Koyama, D., Setoguchi, E., & Sun, A.
(2015) Validity of the TOEFL iBT speaking section for Japanese university students. Language Testing, 32(1), 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockey, G. J., Papageorgiou, S., & French, R.
(2016) Effects of strength of accent on an L2 interactive lecture listening comprehension test. International Journal of Listening, 30(1–2), 84–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortmeyer, C., & Boyle, J.
(1985) The effect of accent differences on comprehension. RELC Journal 16(2), 48–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, B., Taylor, C., & Wall, D
(2011) Establishing evidence of construct: A case study. Paper presented at the 8th annual EALTA conference, Siena, Italy.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, B., & Weir, C. J.
(2011) Language testing and validation. In B. O’Sullivan (Ed.), Language testing: Theory and practice (pp.13–32). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, B., Weir, C. J., & Saville, N.
(2002) Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks. Language Testing, 19(1), 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papageorgiou, S.
(2007) Relating the Trinity College London GESE and ISE examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference. London: Trinity College London.Google Scholar
Parry, T. S., & Meredith, R. A.
(1984) Videotape vs. audiotape for listening comprehension tests: An experiment. OMLTA Journal. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Peacock, M.
(1997) The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51, 144–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L.
(2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinget, A -F., Bosker, H., Quene, H., & de Jong, N.
(2014) Native speakers’ perceptions of fluency and accent in L2 speech. Language Testing, 31(3), 349–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prator, C. H., & Robinett, B. W.
(1972) Manual of American English pronunciation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Progosh, D.
(1996) Using video for listening assessment: Opinions of test-­takers. TESL Canada Journal, 14(1), 34–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G.
(1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.Google Scholar
Richards, J.
(2006) Materials development and research: Making the connection. RELC Journal, 37(1), 5–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roach, P.
(2004) British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34(2), 239–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S., & Berwick, R.
(1992) The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 159–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rost, M.
(2011) Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rubin, A.
(1980) A theoretical taxonomy of the difference between oral and written language. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp.411–438) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rubin, J.
(1995) The contribution of video to the development of competence in listening. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp.151–165). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J.
(2009) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Samejima, F.
(1969) Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L., & Orange, A.
(2009) Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp.71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P., & Egbert, M.
(2006) The interactional organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test. In P. McGovern & S. Walsh (Eds.), IELTS Research Report (Vol. 6, pp.161–205). Canberra: British Council & IDP Australia.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R., & Webb, N.
(1991) Generalizability theory: A primer. New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
Shin, D.
(1998) Using videotaped lectures for testing academic listening proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 12(1), 57–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E., & Inbar, O.
(1991) Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8(1), 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E., Reves, E., & Bejarno, Y.
(1986) Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency. ELT Journal 40(3), 212–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sick, J.
(2010) Rasch measurement in language education Part 5: Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14(2), 23–29. Retrieved from: [URL] (26 July, 2017).Google Scholar
Sinharay, S.
(2004) Model diagnostics for Bayesian networks (ETS Research Report RR-04-17). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., & Bisazza, J.
(1982) The comprehensibility of three varieties of English for college students in seven countries. Language Learning, 32(2), 259–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E., & Bush, M. J.
(1998) Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2(1), 66–78.Google Scholar
Smyth, D.
(2001) Thai speakers. In M. Swan & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroud, R.
(2015) Learner and instructor perspectives of group oral discussion task performance. Humanities Review, 20. Nishinomiya, Japan: Kwansei Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M.
(2005) The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suvorov, R.
(2009) Context visuals in L2 listening tests: The effects of photographs and video vs. audio-only format. In C. A. Chapelle, H. G. Jun, & I. Katz (Eds.), Developing and evaluating language learning materials (pp.53–68). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
(2013) Interacting with visuals in L2 listening tests: An eye-tracking study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
(2015) The use of eye tracking in research on video-based second language L2 listening assessment: A comparison of context videos and content videos. Language Testing, 32(4), 463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S.
(2013) Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1982) The oral/literate continuum in discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp.1–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tauroza, S., & Allison, D.
(1990) Speech rates in British English. Applied linguistics, 11(1), 90–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tauroza, S., & Luk, J.
(1997) Accent and second language listening comprehension. RELC Journal, 28(1), 54–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.
(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning. 58(2): 439–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.
(2006) The changing landscape of English: Implications for language assessment. ELT Journal, 60(1), 51–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., & Galaczi, E.
(2011) Scoring validity. In L. Taylor (Ed.), Examining speaking: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking, 30 (pp.171–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, L., & Geranpayeh, A.
(2011) Assessing listening for academic purposes: Defining and operationalizing the test construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 89–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J.
(1941) Development of facial expression of emotion in blind and seeing children. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), 37(264).Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B.
(2012) Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45, 143–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trakulkasemsuk, W.
(2012) Thai English. In E. L. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia (pp.101–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trinity College London
(2009) Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE) Syllabus – From 1 February 2010. London: Trinity College London.Google Scholar
(2010) Examiners’ Handbook from 2010: Strictly confidential – For examiner use only. London: Trinity College London.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, C.
(2009) Examining washback in second language education contexts: A high stakes provincial exam and the teacher factor in classroom practice in Quebec secondary schools. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(1), 103–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ure, J.
(1971) Lexical density and register differentiation. In J. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), Applications of linguistics (pp.443–452). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urmston, A., Raquel, M., & Tsang, C.
(2013) Diagnostic testing of Hong Kong tertiary students’ English language proficiency: The development and validation of DELTA. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 60–82.Google Scholar
van der Linden, W.
(2012) On compensation in multidimensional response modeling. Psychometrika, 77(1), 21–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P.
(2005) Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237–244.Google Scholar
Van Moere, A.
(2006) Validity evidence in a university group oral test. Language Testing, 23(4), 411–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L.
(2007) Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C.
(2012) Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Raffler-Engel, W.
(1980) Kinesics and paralinguistics: A neglected factor in second language research and teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review, 36, 225–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voss, B.
(1979) Hesitation phenomena as sources of perceptual errors for non-native speakers. Language and Speech, 22(2), 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E.
(2002) Video listening tests: A pilot study. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2(1). Retrieved from: [URL] (1 October, 2017).Google Scholar
(2006) Utilizing the visual channel: An investigation of the use of video texts on tests of second language listening ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
(2007) Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 67–86.Google Scholar
(2008) Video listening tests: What are they measuring? Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(3), 218–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a) Test-takers’ interaction with an L2 video listening test. System, 38(2), 280–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b) The effect of the use of video texts on ESL listening test-taker performance. Language Testing, 27(4), 493–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) An investigation of how the channel of input and access to test questions affect L2 listening test performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 178–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Using unscripted spoken texts to prepare L2 learners for real world listening. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 288–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Assessing listening. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (Vol. 1, pp.47–63). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016a) Survey research in applied linguistics. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics. (pp.83–99). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2016b) Authentic texts in the assessment of L2 listening ability. In J. Banarjee & D. Tsagari (Eds.), Contemporary second language assessment. (pp.438–463). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2018) Texts for listening instruction and assessment. In J. Liontas (Ed.) The TESOL encyclopedia for English language teaching (Vol. 3, pp.1544–1555). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E., Liao, Y. -F., & Wagner, S.
(2016) Testing L2 listening: Making scripted spoken texts “authentic”. Paper presented at the East Coast Organization of Language Testers, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Toth, P.
(2014) Teaching and testing L2 Spanish listening using scripted vs. unscripted texts. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 404–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The role of pronunciation in the assessment of L2 listening ability. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Interfaces in second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives. (pp.72–92). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Wagner, S.
(2016) Scripted and unscripted spoken texts used in listening tasks on high stakes tests in China, Japan, and Taiwan. In V. Aryadoust & J. Fox (Eds.), Current trends in language testing in the Pacific Rim and the Middle East: Policies, analyses, and diagnoses. (pp.103–123). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B.
(1998) Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, N.
(2001) Whaddaya say? Guided practice in relaxed speech (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J.
(2005) Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C.
(1982) Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(1996) Comment: authenticity and autonomy in ELT. ELT Journal 50(1), 67–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Context, community, and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C.
(2012) Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30(2), 231–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, H. F.
(1994) Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wong, J.
(2002) ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, B., & Linacre, J. M.
(1994) Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.Google Scholar
Wright, B., & Masters, G.
(1982) Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: Mesa.Google Scholar
Yanagawa, K.
(2016) Examining the authenticity of the Center Listening Test: Speech rate, reduced forms, hesitation and fillers, and processing levels. JACET Journal, 60, 97–115.Google Scholar
Yanagawa, K., & Green, A.
(2008) To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test. System, 36(1), 107–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zareva, A.
(2010) Multicompetence and L2 users’ associative links: Being unlike nativelike. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 2–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar