Cover not available
Part of
Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 53] 2020
► pp. 99–124

Chapter 5
Interlocutor differences and the role of social others in a Spanish peer tutoring context

 | University of Connecticut
Peer tutoring is a valuable component of additional language learning due to interactions with a knowledgeable interlocutor. Yet many are unaware of the role of what Lantolf (2015) termed “social others” on interlocutors’ and learners’ perceptions and constructions of the target language and culture. Social others include persons who interlocutors perceive as having equal, more, or less knowledge; written texts; and previous or potential selves. Social others do not have to be physically present for mediation on expertise to occur. In this chapter, I analyze video data from Spanish language peer tutoring sessions, triangulating with interview excerpts highlighting peer tutor knowledge and roles. I show how peer tutors mediated their ascribed epistemic stances of expert through social others and co-constructed their own knowledge with learners. These findings interrogate ways in which knowledge is traditionally perceived, highlighting the complex ideologies that surround knowledge of a target language and culture.
Keywords: epistemic incongruence, epistemic stance, interlocutor differences, peer tutoring, social others
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Peer tutoring, sociocultural theory, and epistemic stance
  • Setting and methods
  • Findings
    • Focal participant language histories and beliefs
    • Ways of saying cough syrup: Analysis of Roberto’s peer tutoring session
    • When physics aren’t physical: Analysis of Tomás’s peer tutoring session
  • Discussion and implications
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 21 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.53.05bac
References (21)
References
Back, M. (2016a). Epistemics and expertise in peer tutoring interactions: Co-constructing knowledge of Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Symbolic competence in interaction: Mutuality, memory, and resistance in a peer tutoring context. L2 Journal, 8(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Baquedano-López, P. (2004). Literacy practices across learning contexts. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative dialogue in learner–learner and learner–native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33, 229–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 5, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huong, L. P. H. (2007). The more knowledgeable peer, target language use, and group participation. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 64, 333–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2013). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. (this volume). I ~ You > You ~ Me: The hidden other in L2 development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
(2015, October). The role of the “social other” in sociocultural approaches to second language development. Symposium on Interlocutor Individual Differences in Cognition and SLA, Bloomington, IN.
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J. (2014). Critical approaches to the teaching of Spanish as a local-foreign language. In M. Lacorte (Ed.), The Handbook of Hispanic Applied Linguistics (275–292). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. ERIC Opinion Papers: Doc. # ED448443. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rusk, F., Sahlström, F., & Pörn, M. (2017). Initiating and carrying out L2 instruction by asking known-answer questions: Incongruent interrogative practices in bi- and multilingual peer interaction. Linguistics and Education, 38, 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thonus, T. (2004). What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 227–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 89, 393–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura & YouJin Kim
2022. Chapter 1. Getting started. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura & YouJin Kim
2022. Chapter 6. Unique considerations for ISLA research across approaches. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.