Cover not available
Part of
Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching: A collection of empirical studies
Edited by Wataru Suzuki and Neomy Storch
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 55] 2020
► pp. 19–40

Chapter 1
Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing task

 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
The present study analyzed the effects of completing a dictogloss task on the development of English grammar (3rd person singular -s and articles) in a foreign language primary school context. Fifty 11–12 year-old elementary EFL Spanish learners worked on a dictogloss task individually, and in teacher-assigned dyads and small groups. Their grammar gains were measured by means of a pre- and post-dictogloss grammaticality judgment test. The analysis of the children’s languaging showed that the task encouraged learners in pairs and groups to equally focus on form, although not only on the target features, which did not improve. There was, however, a slight advantage of pairs over small groups and individuals. A number of research implications, drawn from these results, are discussed.
Keywords: children, focus on form, L2 writing, collaboration, dictogloss
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical background
    • Writing-to-learn
    • Collaborative writing
    • Learner group size
  • The study
    • Participants
    • Design and procedures
    • Data coding and analysis
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.01cal
References (50)
References
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M. P. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA (pp. 58–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2014). Cambridge English Movers (YLE Movers), Vol. 1. Available at <[URL]> (22 July, 2019).
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckerth, J. (2008). Investigating consciousness-raising tasks: Pedagogically target and non-target learning gains. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 119–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enever, J. (Ed.). (2018). Policy and politics in global primary English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2014). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 33–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Dictogloss technique. In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80, 165–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldshneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. (2005). Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55(1), 27–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1982). Acquiring a second language. World Englishes, 1(3), 97–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 343–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.). Handbook of second and foreign language writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function and pedagogy. System, 25(2), 215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuda, K., & Iwasaki, N. (2018). Pair-work dynamics: Stronger learners’ languaging engagement and learning outcomes of the Japanese polysemous particles ni/de. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 46–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormerod, M., & Reas, C. (2014). Tiger 6th Primary pupil’s book. Madrid: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sato, M. (2016). Interaction mindsets, interactional behaviors, and L2 development: An affective-social-cognitive model. Language Learning, 67(2), 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Viveros, P. (2016). Interaction or collaboration? Group dynamics in the foreign language classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 91–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–241.Google Scholar
Shak, J. (2006). Children using dictogloss to focus on form. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(2), 47–62.Google Scholar
Spanish Parliament (Congreso de los Diputados). (2013). Organic law for the improvement of the quality of Education, (Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa, LOMCE). Available at <[URL]> (22 July 2019).
Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–117). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 85–304.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Azkarai, Agurtzane & Asier Calzada
2024. A multi-faceted view of engagement with language: a study with young EFL learners working on a collaborative writing task. Classroom Discourse 15:4 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Delgado-Garza, Paloma & María del Pilar García Mayo
2024. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2024. Collaborative writing among young EFL learners in a school context: product and process. The Language Learning Journal 52:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet, Eloi Puig-Mayenco & Montserrat Capdevila
2024. The effect of task-based peer interaction and pre-task instruction on young EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of past tense: An intervention study. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Azkarai, Agurtzane
2023. L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Kos, Tomas
2023. Exploring peer support among young learners during regular EFL classroom lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Kos, Tomáš
2023. A teacher-researcher snapshot of task-based peer interactions in EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:2 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Olioumtsevits, Konstantina, Despina Papadopoulou & Theodoros Marinis
2023. Second language grammar learning in refugee children. Pedagogical Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Roothooft, Hanne, Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola & Bram Bulté
2022. Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2023. Do task repetition and pretask focus on form instruction impact collaborative writing performance?. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Luquin, María & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL children. System 98 ► pp. 102465 ff. DOI logo
Luquin, María & María del Pilar García Mayo
2024. A longitudinal study of the effects of model texts on EFL children's written production. System 120 ► pp. 103190 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.