In this final chapter I articulate how the book contributes to advancing previous intersectional work
between the fields of L2 writing and ISLA/SLA. To this end, I discuss the volume’s expansion of theoretical and
empirical knowledge on writing as a site for language development in terms of (a) new empirical insights provided on
the learning affordances of L2 writing and the variables mediating observed effects, and (b) future research
directions suggested, primarily in terms of domains to be researched, empirical questions to be addressed, and methods
of inquiry to be employed.
Article outline
Dimensions of the connection between writing and language learning: Learning through, by, for, and with writing
New empirical insights on the learning affordances of L2 writing and the variables mediating observed
effects
The language learning potential of writing from the perspective of the affordances of writing vs.
speaking
Learning through writing: New insights on the processing dimension of L2 writing and associated learning effects
Learning by writing: Language learning and the meaning-making activity that is criterial to writing
New directions for future research agendas
Future inquiry into writing processes and effects on learning
Future inquiry into learning that accrues in writing: The role of tasks
The role of individual differences
The role of instruction in promoting vocabulary and grammar learning
Future empirical research agendas: Research methodology considerations
Refinements of constructs and analytical approaches
Relevance of data triangulation and the use of mixed-methods research approaches
Adopting an educational, curricular approach: The needed longitudinal perspective
Byrnes, H. (2014). Theorizing
language development at the intersection of “task” and L2 writing: Reconsidering
complexity. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based
language learning. Insights from and for L2
writing (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2019). What
do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written
languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom
learning (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gass, S. (2010). Relating
L2 input and L2 output. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum
companion to second language
acquisition (pp. 194–219). London: Continuum.
Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital
literacies and language learning. Language Learning &
Technology, 19(3), 1–7.
Harklau, L. (2002). The
role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 11, 329–350.
Hort, S. (2017). Exploring
the use of mobile technologies and process logs in writing
research. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods.
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit
learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Leow, R. & Manchón, R. M. (Forthcoming). Expanding
research agendas: Directions for future research agendas on writing, WCF, language learning, and
ISLA. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook
of SLA and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
López Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J. & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language
reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based
coding system. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 41, 503–527.
Manchón, R. M. (2014). The
internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about
learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based
language learning. Insights from and for L2
writing (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M. (2017). The
potential impact of multimodal composition on language learning. Journal of
Second Language
Writing, 38, 94–95.
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019). Language
learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical
evidence. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of language
learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge: CUP.
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2
writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The
handbook of second and foreign language
writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
McKee, H. & DeVoss, D. N. (Eds.) (2007). Digital
writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The
role of working memory in young second language learners’ written
performances. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 45, 31–45.
Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). Searching
for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL
writers. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 19(2), 61–8.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2020). Digital
L2 writing literacies. Directions for classroom
practice. London: Equinox.
Seror, J. (2013). Screen
capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes. Canadian
Journal of Learning and
Technology, 39(3), 1–16.
Williams, J. (2012). The
potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 21, 321–331.
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Masatoshi Sato & Yizhou Wang
2023. Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions. Language Teaching Research
Leow , Ronald P., Anne Thinglum & Stephanie A. Leow
2022. WCF processing in the L2 curriculum: A look at type of WCF, type of linguistic item, and L2 performance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12:4 ► pp. 651 ff.
ROGERS, JOHN & RONALD P. LEOW
2020. Toward Greater Empirical Feasibility of the Theoretical Framework for Systematic and Deliberate L2 Practice: Comments on Suzuki, Nakata, & DeKeyser (2019). The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 309 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.