Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp.179–201

Ideophones in Khaling Rai

| Histoire des théories linguistiques, CNRS | University of Paris Diderot
In Khaling Rai, a number of lexemes have been found which can be considered ideophones, according to Dingemanse’s (2012: 654) definition of the latter as “marked words depictive of sensory imagery.” This article will describe the different types of ideophones found in Khaling. These ideophones not only manifest a range of different morphological patterns, they cover the entire spectrum of sensory modalities found in Dingemanse’s implicational hierarchy (2012: 663), namely sound, movement, visual patterns, other sensory perceptions (such as texture and taste) and cognitive states. The more than 400 ideophones collected to date in Khaling present a sound symbolic landscape which appears to be considerably richer than that found in other Kiranti languages with which the author is familiar.
Keywords: ideophones, sound symbolism, Khaling Rai, Kiranti
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Types of ideophones in Khaling
  • 3.Type A ideophones
    • 3.1Subtype A1
    • 3.2Subtype A2
    • 3.3Characteristics of type A ideophones
    • 3.4Derivation and combination with verbs
  • 4.Type B ideophones
    • 4.1Semantics
    • 4.2Derivation and combination with verbs
    • 4.3Relationship with type A ideophones
  • 5.Type C ideophones
    • 5.1Subtype C1
    • 5.2Subtype C2
    • 5.3Semantic characteristics
    • 5.4Derivation and combination with verbs
    • 5.5Sources for type C ideophones
  • 6.General issues
    • 6.1Sound symbolism
    • 6.2Reduplication in Khaling
    • 6.3Relationship with auditory demonstrative
    • 6.4Typological issues
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17005.lah
References (18)
References
Diffloth, Gérard. 1994. i: big, a: small. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, 107–114. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10): 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A Grammar of Bantawa. Grammar, Paradigm Tables, Glossary and Texts of a Rai Language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Graczyk, Randolph. 2007. A Grammar of Crow. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 1–14.Google Scholar
(eds). 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhana Khaling. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics, LL 13(6): 1095–1170.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2013. Ideophones in Japhug (Rgyalrong). Anthropological Linguistics 55(3): 256–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Lahaussois, Aimée. 2014. The auditory demonstrative in Khaling. Studies in Language 38(2): 393–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 55(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 2001. Expressives and iconicity in the lexicon. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 165–182.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds) 2001. Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1994. Tone, intonation, and sound symbolism in Lahu: Loading the syllable canon. In Hinton, Nichols & Ohala (eds), 115–129.Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore, Balthasar Bickel, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra P. Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2005. Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Yogendra P. Yadava, Current Issues in Nepalese Linguistics, 205–209. Kirtipur: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
Rai, Novel Kishore & Werner Winter. 1997. Triplicated verbal adjuncts in Bantawa. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas, 119–134. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana. 2015. A Grammar of Yakka [Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz. 2001. Introduction. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 1–8.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard. 2001. A comparison of some Southeast Asian ideophones with some African ideophones. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 385–406.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Lahaussois, Aimée
2023. Ideophonic patterns in Kiranti languages and beyond. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kelly, Barbara & Aimée Lahaussois
2021. Chains of influence in Himalayan grammars: Models and interrelations shaping descriptions of Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2019. Chapter 6. Towards a semantic typological classification of motion ideophones. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2021. The domain of olfaction in Basque. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.