Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 42:2 (2019) ► pp.150221
Blagden, C. O.
1911A preliminary study of the fourth text of the Myazedi inscriptions. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 43(2): 365–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1913–1914The “Pyu” inscriptions. Epigraphia Indica 121: 127–132.Google Scholar
1919The Pyu face of the Myazedi inscription at Pagan. Epigraphia Birmanica 11: 59–68.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel
2015Leipzig glossing rules. ([URL]) (Accessed 30 July 2016).
DeLancey, Scott
2018The inclusive-exclusive distinction in Kuki-Chin and Naga Belt languages. In Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey & Amos Teo (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics (NEIL), 81, 75–85. Canberra: Australian National University: Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access.Google Scholar
Duroiselle, Charles
1919The Burmese face of the Myazedi inscription at Pagan. Epigraphia Birmanica 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Arlo, Bob Hudson, Marc Miyake & Julian K. Wheatley
2017Studies in Pyu epigraphy, I: state of the field, edition and analysis of the Kan Wet Khaung mound inscription, and inventory of the corpus. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 1031: 43–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Arlo, Marc Miyake & Julian K. Wheatley
2018Corpus of Pyu inscriptions. ([URL]) (Accessed 13 May 2018).
Haspelmath, Martin
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. ([URL]) (Accessed 17 May 2018). DOI logo
Jenny, Mathias
2015The far west of Southeast Asia: ‘give’ and ‘get’ in the languages of Myanmar. In N. J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Languages of mainland Southeast Asia: the state of the art (Pacific Linguistics 649), 155–208. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1997Sino-Tibetan numeral systems: prefixes, protoforms and problems. Series B, Volume 1141. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Monier-Williams, Monier
1899A Sanskrit-English dictionary: etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nishi, Yoshio
1999Four papers on Burmese: Toward the history of Burmese (the Myanmar language). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo
1955Myazedi hibun ni okeru chūko Birumago no kenkyū (Studies in the later ancient Burmese language through Myazedi inscriptions). Kodaigaku [Palaeologia] 1955: 17–31.Google Scholar
1966Seikago no kenkyū (A study of the Hsi-hsia language), vol. 21. Tokyo: Zauhō kankōkai.Google Scholar
Okell, John, and Allott, Anna
2001Burmese/Myanmar dictionary of grammatical forms. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1994Outline of Classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1999The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1943Further analysis of the Pyu inscriptions. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 7(4): 313–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shorto, Harry L.
1971A dictionary of the Mon inscriptions from the sixth to the sixteenth centuries: incorporating materials collected by the late C. O. Blagden. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth
2009Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. STEDT monograph series, vol. 81. Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.Google Scholar
Yabu, Shirō
2006Old Burmese (OB) of Myazedi inscription in OB materials. Osaka: Osaka University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar