Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp.3–25

Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Zhuang

| University of Melbourne
This paper discusses evidentiality and epistemic modality in Zhuang, a Tai language spoken in South China’s Guangxi Province and surrounding regions. A set of verbs of SPEAKING are found in Zhuang that describe the sources of information. These typically involve the grammaticalised marker nau⁴ which derives from a lexical verb meaning ‘say’, forming a rich array of expressions to mark direct and indirect speech, hearsay and other types of reported information, which carry a wide variety of evidential and epistemic overtones such as surprise, self-correction, mirativity, uncertainty, among others. A number of sentence-final particles, along with hedges and sensory verbs, are also found with these functions. Each of these conveys different degrees of reliability of the source of information.
Keywords: evidentiality, Zhuang, Tai-Kadai, epistemic modality, reported speech, grammaticalisation
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.1.01luo
References (30)
Aikhenvald, A. 2015. The Art of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, AlexandraY. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M.W. (eds). 2003. Studies in Evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 611: 625–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds) 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2000. Evidentials: semantics and history. In Johanson & Utas (eds), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2005. Semantic distinctions of evidentiality. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), 318–21.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Still mirative after all these years . Linguistic Typology 161: 529–564.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 61: 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka (ed.). 1996. l'Énonciation médiatisée [Bibliothèque de l'Information Grammaticale]. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka & Landaburu, John (eds). 2007. L'énonciation médiatisée II - Le traitement épistémologique de l'information: illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes [Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 63], VIII–433. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds). 2005. World Atlas of Language Structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2008. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity /objectivity as a factor. Discourse Studies 101: 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman O. 1990 [1957]. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In On Language, Roman Jakobson, 386–392. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Utas, Bo (eds). 2000. Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighboring Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalsang, Jay Garfield, Speas, Peggy & de Villiers, Jill. 2013. Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: Evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(2): 517–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 31: 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 2008 Zhuang. In The Tai-Kadai Languages, Anthony V.N. Diller, Jerold Edmondson & Yongxian Luo (eds), 317–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oisel, Guillaume. 2014. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Middle Tibetan. Paper presented at the 47th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
Squartini, Mario. 2007. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 461: 917–47.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.II1, Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Dorje, Sangda. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan. Ithaca NY: Snowlion. (translation of Manuel de tibetain standard, 1998)Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas & LaPolla, Randy 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 240–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson James O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 611: 480–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vokurkova, Zuzana. 2008. Epistemic modalities in Spoken Standard Tibetan. PhD dissertation, Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8.
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121: 51- 97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1994. Semantics and Epistemology: the meaning of ‘evidentials’ in a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences 16(1): 81–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Grey, Alexandra
2019. A polity study of minority language management in China focusing on Zhuang. Current Issues in Language Planning 20:5 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.