Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.292–318

The reported speech evidential particle in Lamjung Yolmo

 | SOAS, University of London
Grammatically encoded evidentials that marks ‘reported speech’, ‘hearsay’ or ‘quotation’ are attested in languages from a variety of families, but often receive cursory description. In this paper I give a detailed account of the reported speech particle ló in Lamjung Yolmo, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. This particle is used when the speaker is reporting previously communicated information. This information may be translated from another language, may be a non-verbal interaction turn or may have been an incomplete utterance. Speakers choose to use the reported speech particle in interaction, and the pragmatic effect is usually to add authority to the propositional content. Detailed description of the use of reported speech evidentials in interaction across different languages will provide a better understanding of the range of their function.
Keywords: evidentiality, Tibeto-Burman, reported speech
Published online: 11 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.2.09gaw
References (52)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. 2004. Grammar and cultural practices: The grammaticalization of triadic communication in West African languages. Journal of West African Languages 30(2).5–28.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace L. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1961. A Garo Grammar. Pune: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
Caplow, Nancy J. 2000. The epistemic marking system of émigré Dokpa Tibetan. Unpublished ms. University of California. Santa Barbara. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace. L. Chafe and Joanna. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014. A grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden, The Netherlands: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies.Google Scholar
Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles: University of California PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar .
Gawne, Lauren. 2013a. Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Notes on the relationship between Yolmo and Kagate. Himalayan Linguistics 12(2).1–27.Google Scholar
. 2014. Evidentiality in Lamjung Yolmo. Journal of the South East Asian Linguistics Society 71.76–96.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. A sketch grammar of Lamjung Yolmo. Canberra: Asia Pacific Linguistics.
Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Melvyn C. & Nawang Nornang. 1970. Modern spoken Tibetan: Lhasa dialect. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 51.1–48.Google Scholar
Hari, Anna Maria. 2010. Yohlmo Sketch Grammar. Kathmandu: Ekta books.Google Scholar
Hari, Anna Maria, & Chhegu Lama. 2004. Hyolmo-Nepālī-An̆̇grejī śabdakośa (Yohlmo-Nepali-English dictionary). Kathmandu: Central Dept. of Linguistics, Tribhnvan University.Google Scholar
Höhlig, Monika. 1978. Speaker orientation in Syuwa (Kagate). In Joseph E. Grimes (ed.), Papers on discourse (Vol. 501), 19–24. Kathmandu: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 2007. Evidentiality in Rgyalthang Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2).17–44.Google Scholar
Huber, Brigitte. 2005. The Tibetan dialect of Lende (Kyirong). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. A phonological profile of Cone. In Jackson T.-S. Sun (ed.) Phonological Profiles of Little-Studied Tibetic Varieties, 265–371. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume and Anton Antonov. 2014. Semi-direct speech in Rgyalrongic languages: Stau vs Japhug, paper presented atSyntax of the World’s Languages VI, Pavia, September 10.
Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. A Tibetan-English Dictionary. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J., & Chenglong Huang. 2003. A grammar of Qiang with annotated texts and glossary. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Sung-Woo. 2011. Eastern Tamang grammar sketch. Dallas: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lidz, Liberty A. 2007. Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 30(2).45–87.Google Scholar
Maibaum, Anita, & Esther Strahm. 1973. Jirel texts. In Austin Hale (ed.), Clause, sentence and discouse patterns in selected Languages of Nepal: V. 4 word lists, 177–300. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1982. The grammar of Lahu (2nd ed.). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: system and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2012. Nanti self-quotation: Implications for the pragmatics of reported speech and evidentiality. Pragmatics and Society 3(2).321–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (forthcoming). The cultural bases of linguistic form: The development of Nanti quotative evidentials. In Randy J. LaPolla & Rik De Busser (eds.), The shaping of language: The relationship between the structure of languages and their social, cultural, historical and natural environments. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2010. Turung: a variety of Singpho language spoken in Assam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: narrative retelling. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John. 2000. Evidentials, inferentials and mirativity in Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(3).13–37.Google Scholar
Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2007. A Grammar of Galo. Melbourne: La Trobe University.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Lauren Gawne, Darja Hoenigman, Julia Colleen Miller, Stef Spronck, Alan Rumsey, Alice Carroll & Nicholas Evans. 2012. Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation and Conservation 61.135–174.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, & Loughnane, Robin. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1).111–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schöttelndreyer, Burkhard. 1980. Persons markers in Sherpa. Pacific Linguistics A 531.125–130.Google Scholar
Simon, Walter. 1968. Tibetan “re” in Its Wider Context. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 31(3).555–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(4).143–188.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas. 1991. The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1).93–107.Google Scholar
. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart and Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier, 281–308. Saale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas, & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of standard Tibetan: Language and civilisation. Ithaca: Snowlion Publications.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas, & LaPolla, Randy J. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2).240–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in language 12(1).51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: a comparative study. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Evidentiality and inferentiality: Overlapping and contradictory functions of the so-called evidential markers in Ladakhi (West Tibetan). Paper presented atthe Nature of Evidentiality conference, Leiden, June 14-16, 2012.
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2020. Reported speech in earthquake narratives from six Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language 44:2 ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina
2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 23:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren
2016. Questions and answers in Lamjung Yolmo. Journal of Pragmatics 101 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren
2019. A grammatical overview of Yolmo (Tibeto-Burman). WikiJournal of Humanities 2:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren
2020. Looks like a duck, quacks like a hand: Tools for eliciting evidential and epistemic distinctions, with examples from Lamjung Yolmo (Tibetic, Nepal). Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren
2020. Looks like a duck, quacks like a hand: Tools for eliciting evidential and epistemic distinctions, with examples from Lamjung Yolmo (Tibetic, Nepal). Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.