Cover not available
Review published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.319–323
Book review

Picus Sizhi Ding. A grammar of Pumi.

Reviewed by
Published online: 11 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.2.10jac
References (24)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014a. A grammar of Wadu Pumi: LaTrobe University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Volition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:1. 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Review of ‘A Grammar of Pumi’. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 44.1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 529–564.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus. 1998. Fundamentals of Prinmi (Pumi): A Tibeto-Burman language of northwestern Yunnan: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2001. The pitch-accent system of Niuwozi Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2. 57–83.Google Scholar
. 2003. Prinmi: a sketch of Niuwozi. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 588–601. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. A typological study of tonal systems of Japanese and Prinmi: Towards a definition of pitch-accent languages. Journal of Universal Language 7.1. 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Use of Perception Tests in Studying the Tonal System of Prinmi Dialects: A Speaker-centered Approach to Descriptive Linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation 1.2. 154–181.Google Scholar
. 2014. A grammar of Prinmi. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus & Caroline Féry. 2014. Word Order, Information Structure and Intonation of Discontinuous Nominal Constructions in Cantonese. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 43.2. 110–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fù, Àilán. 1998. 普米語動詞的語法範疇 Pǔmǐyǔ dòngcí de yǔfǎ fànchóu (The Categories of the Pumi Verb). 北京：中國文史出版社 Běijīng: Zhōngguó wénshǐ chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2011a. A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121.9. 1518–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Tonal alternations in the Pumi verbal system. Language and Linguistics 12.2. 359–392.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Anton Antonov, Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima. 2014. Person marking in Stau. Himalayan Linguistics 13.1. 82–92.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113.3. 271–285.Google Scholar
Lù, Shàozūn. 2001. 普米語方言研究 Pŭǔmĭyǔ fāngyán yánjiū (A study on Pumi dialectology). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1997. Dayang Pumi phonology and adumbrations of comparative Qiangic. Mon-Khmer Studies 271. 171–213.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou. 2014. Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume Jacques & Robert Rankin. 2012. Historical transfer of nasality between consonantal onset and vowel: from C to V or from V to C? Diachronica 29.2. 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 240–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar