To be specified published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.139160
References

References

Aghlara, L., & Tamjid, N. H.
(2011) The effect of digital games on Iranian children’s vocabulary retention in foreign language acquisition. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 291, 552–560.Google Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J.
(2012) Task repetition in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(3), 380–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
(2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alhinty, M.
(2015) Young language learners’ collaborative learning and social interaction as a motivational aspect of the Ipad. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(2), 24–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A.
(2016) Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 501, 844–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
(2016) Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 480–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G.
(2011) The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311: 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G., Someya, Y. & Fukuhara, E.
(2014) Online games for young learners’ foreign language learning. ELT Journal, 68(3), 265–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G., Kang, K. I., Kim, H., & Liu, Y.
(2018) ‘Tasks’ appearing in primary school textbooks. ELT Journal, 72(3), 285–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W.
(2015) Young learners’ interactional development in task-base paired assessment in their first and foreign languages: A case of English learners in China. Education 3–13, 43 (3), 292–321.Google Scholar
(2011) Interactional competence during task –based assessment for your learners of English. Paper presented at the 2011 AAAL conference, Chicago, IL, March 26–29.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G.
(2017) Motivational elements of digital instructional games. A study of young L2 learners’ game design. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 735–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Gaming and young learners. In S. Garton & F. Copland (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching young learners (pp. 305–319). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134–146). Oxford, UK: Macmillan Heinemann.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
(2018) Learning language through task repetition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 249–274). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2001) Teaching Language to Young Learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carless, D.
(2004) Issues in teachers’ interpretations of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Implementing task-based learning with young learners. ELT Journal, 56(4), 389–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P.
(1994) Same task, different activities: analysis of SLA form an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
(1990) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Colllins.Google Scholar
(1996) Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Czimmermann, E., & Piniel, K.
(2016) Advanced language learners’ experiences in the Hungarian EFL classroom. In P. D. MacIntyre et al. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 193–214). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decker, M. M., & Buggey, T.
(2014) Using video self- and peer modelling to facilitate reading fluency in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deng, C., & Carless, D.
(2010) Examining preparation or effective teaching: Conflicting priorities in the implementation of a pedagogic innovation. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(4), 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G.
(2014) ‘Young learners’: Clarifying our terms. ELT Journal, 68(1), 75–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Heimbach, R.
(1997) Bugs and birds: Children’s acquisition of second language vocabulary. System, 25(2), 247–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2017) Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forwards. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enever, J.
2018Policy and Politics in Global primary English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fukuta, J.
(2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarolla, A.
(2015) Do children negotiate meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 541, 40–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A.
(2016) Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics. An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Child EFL interaction: age instructional setting and development. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Early language learning: Complexity and mixed methods (pp. 249–268). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., Agirre, A. I., & Azkarai, A.
(2018) Task repetition effects on CAF in EFL child task-based oral interaction. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. P. García Mayo (Eds.), Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 9–27). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gonzáles Lloret, M., & Ortega, L.
(2014) Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In M. Gonzales Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatherly, A., & Chapman, B.
(2013) Fostering motivation for literacy in early childhood education using IPads. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Teaching, Technology, 25(1–3), 138–151.Google Scholar
Hawkes, M.
(2012) Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66(3), 327–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahn, G.
(2012) Open-ended tasks and the qualitative investigation of second language classroom discourse. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 61, 90–107.Google Scholar
Khoo, E., Merry, R., & Nguyen, N. H.
(2015) Ipads and opportunities for teaching and learning for young children. Hamilton, New Zealand: The University of Waikato, Waikato Print.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S.
(2017) Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task-performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lázaro Ibarolla, A. & Azpilicueta Martinez, R.
(2015) Investigating negotiation of meaning in EFL children with very low levels of proficiency. International Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legutke, M. L., Müller-Hatmann, A., & Schocker-v Ditfurth, M.
(2009) Teaching English in the primary school. Stuttgart, Germany: Kett Lerntraining.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W.
(2004) The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
2014Second Language Acquisition and Task-based Language Teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 5–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R.
(1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & Gass, S. M. (Eds.), Tasks in language learning (pp. 123–67). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Mclean, J.
(2001) A case of exercising: effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. and R. Oliver
2002Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development System. 30(4): 459–477.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J.
(2003) Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS/NNS and NNS/NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Silver, R. E.
(2005) Interactional tasks and English L2 learning by immigramt children in Singapore. System, 331, 239–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R.
(2007) Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majoral, F. B.
(2019) Mobile learning for young English learners. In S. Garton & F. Copland (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 320–337). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
MoLeNET
(2007) The mobile learning network. (MoLeNET). [URL]
Murphey, T.
(2016) Teaching to learn and well-become: Many mini-renaissances. In P. D. MacIntyre et al. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 324–343). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ness, M.
(2016) Is that how I really sound? Using I-pads for fluency practice. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 611–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, J., & Nguyen, B. T. T.
Nunan, D.
(2004) Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Mara, J., & Laidlow, L.
(2011) Living in the iworld: Two literacy researchers reflect on the changing texts and literacy practices of childhood. English Teaching Practice and Critique, 10(4), 149–159.Google Scholar
Oliver, R.
(1995) Negative feedback in child NS/NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 459–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 82(3), 372–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50(1), 119–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R.
(2016) Toward a psychology of well-being for language learners: The EMPATHICS vision. In P. D. Macintyre et al. (Eds.), Positive pychology in SLA (pp. 10–90). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A., & Rodgers, T. S.
(1983) Games in language teaching. Language Teaching, 16(1), 2–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, M.
(2014) Language tasks using touch screen and mobile technologies: Reconceptualising task-based CALL for young language learners. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 40(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L.
(2009) Other-repetition as a resource for participation in in the activity of playing a video game. Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A.
(2015) Task-based learning with children. In J. Bland (Ed.), Teaching English to young learners (pp. 113–128). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(2007) Benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Verbal evidence of task-related strategies: Child versus adult interactions. System, 341, 615–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press). Learning to become researchers; towards participation? In A. Eckhoff Ed. Participatory research with young children Dordrecht, The Netherlands Springer DOI logo
Rixon, S.
(1981) How to use games in language teaching. London, UK: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Robson, C., Balmpied, N., & Walker, L.
(2015) Effects of feedforward video self-modelling on reading fluency and comprehension. Behaviour Change, 32(1), 46–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L.
(2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 251, 54–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, K., & Dousti, M.
(2013) The effect of length of exposure to CALL technology on Young Iranian EFL learners’ grammar gain. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 14–26.Google Scholar
Sample, E., & Michael, M.
(2014) An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 31(8), 23–47.Google Scholar
Samuda, V.
(2000) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In Bygate et al. (Eds.) Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shehade, A.
in press). Foreword: new frontiers in task-based language teaching research. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. P. García Mayo Eds. Recent perspectives on task-based language learning and teaching Berlin De Gruyter Mouton DOI logo
Shintani, N.
(2012a) Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process- product study. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 253–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Using tasks with young beginner learners: The role of the teacher. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 279–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Input based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suh, S., Kim, S. W., & Kim, N. J.
(2010) Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary English education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 337–378.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 831, 320–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. and S. Lapkin
2001Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: epxloring task effects. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Person Longman. pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Sykes, J., & Reinhardt, J.
(2013) Language at play: Digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning. New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
Willis, J.
(1996) A framework for task-based learning. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, J., & Willis, D.
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(1997) Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output. Language Learning, 47(4), 589–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verheyden, L., & Verhelst, M.
(2007) Opportunities for task-based language teaching in kindergarten. In Van den Branden et al. (Eds.) Tasks in action (pp. 285–309). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.
(1978) Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ziegler, N.
(2016) Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 136–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar