The purpose of this article is to discuss how task-based language teaching (TBLT) can work with beginner-level
learners by using input-based tasks. It begins by dismissing a common critique of TBLT, namely that learners need to be taught
some language before they can perform tasks, by arguing that input-based tasks make TBLT possible with beginner-level learners and
that such an approach is entirely compatible with what research has shown about the early stages of L2 acquisition. A review of
the research that has investigated input-based tasks follows and serves to identify key features in the design and implementation
of tasks. Designing input-based tasks involves considering the choice of topic, the non-verbal devices that are central to the
tasks, the pre-selection of target language, the verbal input for the task, and the task outcomes. Implementation options include
task preparation, use of the learners’ first language, input modification and elaboration, focus-on-form and feedback, and task
repetition.
Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern language Journal, 91, 45–62.
Cekaite, A. (2017). What makes a child a good language learner? Interactional competence, identity and immersion in a Swedish classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 371, 45–61.
Clark, E. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duran, G. & Ramaut, G. (2006). Tasks for absolute beginners and beyond: Developing and sequencing tasks at basic proficiency levels. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 47–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
Ellis, R. (1984). Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, & B. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL’83: The question of context (pp. 53–66). Washington DC: TESOL.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49–74). Harlow: Longman Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 191, 221–246.
Ellis, R. (2018). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research.
Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 285–310.
Ellis, R., & Heimbach, R. (1997). Bugs and birds: Children’s acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction. System, 251, 247–259.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension and the acquisition of word meanings. Language Learning, 441, 449–91.
Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2018). Task-based language teaching for beginner-level learners of L2 French: An exploratory study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(1), 1–26.
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301–347.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 401, 243–249.
Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. (2012). Task-based language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. Modern language Journal 95(Supplementary Issue), 81–103.
Long, M. (1983). Native-speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 41, 126–41.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 121–158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Long, M. H. (2016). In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Oliver, R., & Azakarai, A. (2017). Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 371, 62–76.
Pinter, A. (2015). Task-based learning with children. In J. Bland (Ed.), Teaching English to young learners. London: Bloomsbury.
Prabhu, V. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
Samuda, V., & M. Bygate. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 567–90.
Shintani, N. (2012). Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39–51.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of plural-s by Japanese children in comprehension-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 607–637.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislating by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 261, 376–401.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Butler, Yuko G.
2024. Young Learners and Language Teaching. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Delgado-Garza, Paloma & María del Pilar García Mayo
2024. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Jin, Shali
2024. Optimizing english teaching: ARCS motivation model and task-based language teaching in university. Learning and Motivation 87 ► pp. 102028 ff.
Morales, Jean Claire, Saiphin Siharak, Sukanya Boonsri & Surat Kwanboonjan
2024. 2024 9th International STEM Education Conference (iSTEM-Ed), ► pp. 1 ff.
2024. The effect of task-based peer interaction and pre-task instruction on young EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of past tense: An intervention study. Language Teaching Research
2023. Weaving game and task into content-language integration: Proposing a game-mediated dual learning model. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tigchelaar, Magda, Virginia David, Amira Eldemerdash, Selena Protacio & Susan Piazza
2023. K-12 content teachers designing language tasks: A follow-up to Erlam, 2016. Language Teaching Research► pp. 136216882211484 ff.
Dang, Leilei & Ning Cao
2022. Construction and Application of a Task-Based Teaching Model of College English Based on Random Matrix Theory. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022 ► pp. 1 ff.
AKBANA, Yunus Emre & Aysun YAVUZ
2021. English As a Foreign Language Learners’ and Their Teacher’s Feedback on Form Focused Instruction. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama 17:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.