This essay discusses language uniformity and diversity in the light of recent developments of the minimalist program (Hauser et al. 2002; Chomsky 2008; Berwick & Chomsky 2011, and much related work). It pursues two leading ideas. First, Universal Grammar (UG) is maximally minimal: hence early internal language (I-language) is largely uniform across individuals, language variation being mainly or entirely confined to externalization. Second, the mapping from I-language to external language (E-language) is non-isomorphic (the Non-isomorphy Generalization), morphological processes such as agreement and case marking being E-language phenomena, taking place in the externalization component. The first line of reasoning converges with many of Chomsky’s recent ideas, the second one is more divergent. Keywords: E-language; externalization; I-language; person; tense; non-isomorphy generalization
2018. Ter estado resultante não é ter construção resultativa: predicados secundários pseudo-resultativos e orações adjuntas de resultado no português brasileiro. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 34:2 ► pp. 547 ff.
Holmberg, Anders
2017. Universal Grammar. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 275 ff.
Madariaga, Nerea
2017. Understanding Grammars through Diachronic Change. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2012. Case variation: Viruses and star wars. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.