Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 1–25

Socio-syntax and variation in acquisition

Problematizing monolingual and bidialectal acquisition

| Meertens Instituut (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) & Maastricht University
This paper has two aims:* first, to emphasize how the linguistic input to which children are exposed is inherently variable and complex. To this end, we will discuss two particular phenomena in Dutch, namely Aux+Inf and gender marking in DP’s. These phenomena lend themselves to a comparison in terms of the nature of the individual, social and regional variation in the input. Second, regarding the question of whether bidialectal acquisition is the same as bilingual acquisition, it seems that there are, in fact, significant differences between the two. Bidialectal children score significantly higher on vocabulary tests than bilingual speakers, they use the Aux+Inf structure in a different way and they also acquire the neuter gender of the Dutch definite determiner significantly faster than bilingual children. Importantly, this paper also explores whether we can maintain a distinction between monolingual and bidialectal children in so-called bidialectal areas.
Published online: 25 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.1.01cor
References (58)
Auer, Peter. 2004. Non-standard evidence in syntactic typology. Dialectology meets typology. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 69–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect /standard constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation, 7–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The monolingual bias in bilingualism research -or: Why bilingual talk is (still) a challenge for linguistics. In Monica Heller (ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach, 319–339. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. Variation and the minimalist program. In Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological with the social, 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham. 2008. Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects, Part II. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin. 2010. Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 141. 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Siebe de Korte. 2011. Dummy auxiliaries in child and adult second language acquisition of Dutch. Lingua 1211. 906–919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Daniela Polišenskà & Sharon Unsworth. 2008. The acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research 241. 259–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Daniela Polišenskà & Fred Weerman. 2008. Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research 241. 297–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie. 1998. Habitual doen in Heerlen Dutch. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Marijke van der Wal & Arjan van Leuvensteijn (eds.), Do in English, Dutch and German. History and present-day variation, 83–101. Amsterdam/ Münster: Stichting Neerlandistiek/Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
. 2006. Intermediate syntactic variants in a dialect – standard speech repertoire and relative acceptability. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ralf Vogel (eds.), Gradience in grammar. Generative perspectives, 85–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Loosing grammatical gender in Dutch. The result of bilingual acquisition and/or an act of identity? International Journal of Bilingualism – Ethnolects? The Emergence of New Varieties among Adolescents 12(1&2). 105–124.Google Scholar
. 2013a. Child use of auxiliary + infinitive in Dutch: Acquisition device or reflection of the input. In E. Blom, I. van der Craats & J. Verhagen (eds.), Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition, 369–394. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Recent developments in Limburg. In Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: Dutch. An international handbook of linguistic variation, 378–399. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2014. Language contact, linguistic variability and the construction of local identities. In Tor Åfarli & Britt Mæhlum (eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar, 67–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Karen P. Corrigan. 2005. Toward an integrated approach to syntactic variation: a retrospective and prospective synopsis. In L. Cornips & K.P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological with the social, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Hulk. 2006. External and internal factors in bilingual and bidialectal language development: Grammatical gender of the Dutch definite determiner. In Lefebvre Claire, White Lydia & Jourdan Christine (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis. Dialogues, 355–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Factors of success and failure in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research 281. 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Late child acquisition and identity construction: Variation in use of the Dutch definite determiners de and het. In Peter Auer, Javier Caro Reina & Göz Kaufmann (eds.), Language variation European perspectives IV. Studies in language variation, 57–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Mara van der Hoek & Ramona Verwer. 2006. The acquisition of grammatical gender in bilingual child acquisition of Dutch (by older Moroccan and Turkish children). The definite determiner, attributive adjective and relative pronoun. In Bettelou Los & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Linguistics in The Netherlands 20061, 40–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Vincent de Rooij & Jürgen Jaspers. Forthcoming. The politics of labelling youth vernaculars in the Netherlands and Belgium. In J. Nortier & B. Svendsen (eds.), Multilingual urban sites. Structure, activity and ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Dirkx, Merel. 2012. Verwerving van grammaticaal geslacht in Limburg. Door Nederlands eentalige, dialectsprekende en anderstalige kinderen. MA-thesis, UvA/Meertens Institute.
Driessen, Geert. 2006. Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 751. 103–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Lloyd M. & Douglas M. Dunn. 2007. Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4). Minneapolis, USA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lloyd M., Leota M. Dunn & Liesbeth Schlichting. 2005. Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pearson.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penny. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1). 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. & J. Irvine 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Google Scholar
Geerts, Guido, Walter Haeseryn, Jaap de Rooij, & Maarten C. van den Toorn. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Leonie Cornips. 2005. Differences and similarities between L2 and (2)L1: DO-support in child Dutch. In L. Dekydtspotter, et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004). Cacadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA, 163–177.
Irvine, Judith. 2001. Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Penelope Eckert & John Rickford (eds.), Stylistic variation in language, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline van. 1997. First steps in WH-movement. Ph. D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language variation and change 81. 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.). 2000. Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American research.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 11. 85–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lalleman, Josine. 1986. Dutch language proficiency of Turkish children born in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 2009. Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 281. 5–34.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideology and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4). 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine & Margreet Dorleijn. 2008. A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism 121. 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Eleanore. 1993. Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3). 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Eleanore & Bambi Schieffelin. 1995. The impact of language socialization on grammatical development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 73–94. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Paradis, Johanne. 2011. Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(3). 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Nathalie Dion. 2009. Prescription vs. praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language 85(3). 557–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roodenburg, Jasper & Aafke Hulk. 2008. Puzzles on grammatical gender. Lingue Linguaggio 11. 67–92.Google Scholar
Schneider, Britta. 2014. Oh boy, hablas español?- Salsa and the multiple value of authenticity in late capitalism. In Véronique Laoste, Jakob Leimgruber & Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Indexing authenticity: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 113–135. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham & Liane Fortune. 2007. “Mam, my trousers is fa’in doon!”: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 191. 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21(1). 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham & Hazel Richards. 2013. The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. Linguistics 51(2). 258–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon. 2008. Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research 241. 365–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 161. 86–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon & Aafke Hulk. 2010. L1 acquisition of neuter gender in Dutch: Production and judgement. Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Unsworth, Sharon, Froso Argyri, Leonie Cornips, Aafke Hulk, Antonella Sorace & Ianthi Tsimpli 2011a. On the role of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. In M. Pirvulescu, M.C. Cuervo, A.T. Pérez-Leroux, J. Steele & N. Strik (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2010), 249–3265. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Bilingual acquisition of Greek voice morphology and Dutch gender: What do they have in common? In Nick Danis, Kate Mesh & Hyunsuk Sung (eds.), BUCLD 35 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 590–602. Cascadilla Press.
Zuckerman, Shalom. 2001. The Acquisition of “Optional” Movement. Ph. D. dissertation, Groningen University.
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Cornips, Leonie & Petra Sleeman
2024. Variation in the use of the partitive pronoun ER in regional (Heerlen) standard Dutch. Linguistic Variation DOI logo
Gregersen, Frans, Leonie Cornips & Ditte Boeg Thomsen
2021. The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender of Determiners in Danish Monolingual and Bilingual Children: An Experimental Study. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Allott, Nicholas & Georges Rey
2017. The many errors of Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth. The Linguistic Review 34:3 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Blom, Elma, Leonie Cornips & Jeannette Schaeffer
2017. Cross-linguistic influence in bilingualism. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Brouwer, Susanne
2017. Masking release effects of a standard and a regional linguistic variety. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:2 ► pp. EL237 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie
2017. Chapter 4. Child acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. In Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation [Studies in Language Variation, 20], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie
2018. Chapter 2. Bilingual child acquisition through the lens of sociolinguistic approaches. In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie
2020. Dialect acquisition by ‘new speakers’ of Dutch and their linguistic othering. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie
2022. The Predictability of Social Stratification of Syntactic Variants. In Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Cornips, Leonie & Frans Gregersen
2017. Comparative studies of variation in the use of grammatical gender in the Danish and Dutch DP in the speech of youngsters. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Francot, R.J., Kirsten van den Heuij, Elma Blom, Wilbert Heeringa & Leonie Cornips
2017. Inter-individual variation among young children growing up in a bidialectal community. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VI [Studies in Language Variation, 19], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Ramachers, Stefanie, Susanne Brouwer & Paula Fikkert
2017. How Native Prosody Affects Pitch Processing during Word Learning in Limburgian and Dutch Toddlers and Adults. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
RAMACHERS, STEFANIE, SUSANNE BROUWER & PAULA FIKKERT
2018. No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants. Journal of Child Language 45:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
O’Shannessy, Carmel
2015. Multilingual children increase language differentiation by indexing communities of practice. First Language 35:4-5 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.