Abels, Klaus. 2012. The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 431. 229–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adger, David, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.). 2004. Peripheries. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. Left-dislocation (including CLLD). In Everaert & van Riemsdijk (eds.), 668–699. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Edit Doron & Caroline Heycock. 2004. Broad subjects and clitic left-dislocation. In Adger et al. (eds.), 329–358. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1994. Clitic dependencies in Modern Greek. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Salzburg.
Aoun, Joseph & Elabbas Benmamoun. 1998. Minimality, reconstruction, and PF-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 291. 569–597. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnaudova, Olga. 2002. Clitic left-dislocation and argument structure in Bulgarian. In Jindřich Toman (ed.), Proceedings of FASL 101, 23–46. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clitic left-dislocation is contrastive topicalization. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 91. 31–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arregi, Karlos. 2010. Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 281. 539–592. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon & George M. Horn. 1976. Remarks on “conditions on transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 71. 265–299.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 1996. On the structural position of themes and goals. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 7–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C. 2001. The natures of nonconfigurationality. In Mark R. Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 407–438. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null subjects. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Barbosa, Pilar. 2000. Clitics: A window into the null-subject property. In João Costa (ed.), Essays in Portuguese comparative syntax, 31–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barros, Matthew, Patrick D. Elliott & Gary Thoms. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms., Rutgers University, University College London and University of Edinburgh.
Belletti, Adriana. 2006. Extending doubling to non-local domains: Complete vs. partial copying + deletion and related reconstruction issues. In Brandt & Fuß (eds.), 129–136. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax, 39–64. Amsterdam: North Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1999. Adverbs: The hierarchy paradox. GLOT International 41. 27–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bocci, Giuliano. 2007. Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian. Nanzan Linguistics 31. 35–70.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandt, Patrick & Eric Fuß (eds.). 2006. Form, structure, and grammar. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 631. 741–782. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruening, Benjamin. 2015. Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 211. article 5.
Brunetti, Lisa. 2003. ‘Information’ focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 221, 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büring, Daniel. 2013. Syntax, information structure, and prosody. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 860–896. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 33–63. London/New York: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammatical classes. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–234. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 121. 93–126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Laura J. Downing. 2009. Where’s the topic in Zulu? The Linguistic Review 261. 207–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On W H-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Ken-stowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? 1–29. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax, 506–569. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 441. 1–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1983. ‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘connectedness’. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text, 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, Chris. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.). 2009. Alternatives to cartography. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2012. Ellipsis, identity, and accomodation. Ms., HU Brussels/KU Leuven.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 1201. 50–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Cat, Cécile. 2007. French dislocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2003. Appositives at the interfaces. Irvine: Doctoral Dissertation, University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structures. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder. 2000. Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 541. 41–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewald, Anika. 2012. Spontansprachliche Versetzungsstrukturen im Deutschen. Doctoral Disser-tation, University of Cologne.
Dobashi, Yoshihito. 2003. Phonological phrasing and syntactic derivation. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. Clitic-doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 351–397.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, Bruce T. 1970. Syntactic structure and phonological phrasing in English. Austin: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas.
Downing, Laura J. 2011. The prosody of ‘dislocation’ in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 1211. 772–786. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Adger et al. (eds.), 75–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Everaert, Martin & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.). 2006. The Blackwell companion to syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2006. On pure syntax. In Brandt & Fuß (eds.), 137–158.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanselow, Gisbert & Denisa Lenertová. 2011. Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 291. 169–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2008. The prosody–syntax interface in Catalan. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Potsdam.
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2014. The intonation of left-dislocations in Spanish and other Romance languages. Habilitation thesis, University of Frankfurt.
Fiengo, Robert & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frascarelli, Mara. 1997. The phonology of focus and topic in Italian. The Linguistic Review 141. 221–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax–phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Werner. 1993. Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Werner. 2004. Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of German left-dislocation. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 203–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Werner. 2009. Comparing remarks on German left-dislocation and Italian Clitic left-dislocation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Information Structure in the Theory of Grammar and in Language Acquisition, University of Lund, September 19 2009.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative… concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 181. 457–523. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grewendorf, Günther. 2008. The left clausal periphery: Clitic left-dislocation in Italian and left-dislocation in German. In Shaer et al. (eds.), 49–94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma, & Takao Yagi (eds.), Aspects of modern English linguistics, 232–254. Toyko: Kaitakusha.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halpern, Aaron L. 1998. Clitics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 101–122. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamlaoui, Fatima & Emmanuel-Moselly Makasso. 2013. Object left-dislocation, topicalization and the syntax–phonology mapping of intonation phrases in Bàsàá. Ms., ZAS Berlin.
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert & van Riemsdijk (eds.), 174–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Eric. 1999. On D-pronouns and the movement of topic features. Folia Linguistica 331. 59–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb-second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax, 342–383. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. Clitics and island effects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 11–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iatridou, Sabine & Anthony S. Kroch. 1992. The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 501. 1–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
İnce, Atakan. 2012. Fragment answers and islands. Syntax 151. 181–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanerva, Jonni M. 1990. Focusing on phonological phrases in Chichewa. In Sharon Inkelas & Draga Zec (eds.), The phonology–syntax connection, 145–161. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenesei, István & Irene Vogel. 1990. Focus and phonological structure. Paper presented at GLOW, University of Cambridge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koster, Jan. 1978. Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Samuel Jay Keyser (ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages, 53–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krapova, Iliyana. 2004. Word order in topic–focus structures in the Balkan languages. Venice: Ms., Università Ca’ Foscari.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kučerová, Ivona & Ad Neeleman (eds.). 2012. Contrasts and positions in information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 31, vol. 21, 301–320. Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lipták, Anikó. 2011. The structure of the topic field in Hungarian. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery, 163–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lipták, Anikó & Luis Vicente. 2009. Pronominal doubling under VP-topicalization. Lingua 1191. 650–686. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. 2003. Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica 571. 193–231. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. To appear. Dislocations. In Caroline Féry & Shin Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manzini, Rita. 2010. The structure and interpretation of (Romance) complementizers. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementizer phase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2004a. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 271. 661–738. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2004b. Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 241. 471–481.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. To appear. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mollica, Fabio. 2010. Korrelate im Deutschen und im Italienischen. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion “sentence”. In Braj Kachru, Robert Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, & Sol Saporta (eds.), Issues in linguistics, 719–751. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neeleman, Ad & Hans Van de Koot. 2008. Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 111. 137–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating positions: Syntax and semantics of sentence modification. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Ott, Dennis. 2012a. Local instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis. 2012b. Movement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of WC-CFL 301, 281–291. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis. 2014. An ellipsis approach to Contrastive Left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 269–303. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis. 2015. Ellipsis in appositives. Ms., University of Ottawa.
Ott, Dennis & Edgar Onea. In press. On the form and meaning of appositives. In Proceedings of NELS 45. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Ott, Dennis & Volker Struckmeier. In press. Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. In Proceedings of PLC 39.
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries. 2014. A biclausal analysis of right-dislocation. In Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole, & Amanda Rysling (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 43, vol. 21, 41–54. Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries. 2015. Right-dislocation as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (online). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Park, Bum-Sik. 2005. Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean. In John Alderete, Chung Hye Han, & Alexei Kochetov (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 241, 317–325. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2004. Topic and focus as linear notions: Evidence from Italian and Russian. Lingua 1141. 325–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax. In Peter Collins & David Lee (eds.), The clause in English, 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left periphery of V2 rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Susanne van der Kleij, Sjef Barbiers, & Leonie Cornips (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–242. Amsterdam: The Meertens Institute.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raposo, Eduardo E. 1996. Towards a unfication of topic constructions. Santa Barbara: Ms., University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Repp, Sophie & Heiner Drenhaus. 2015. Intonation influences processing and recall of left-dislocation sentences by indicating topic vs. focus status of dislocated referent. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 301. 324–346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. Left-dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rochemont, Michael S. 1989. Topic islands and the subjacency parameter. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 341. 145–170. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green, & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago: CLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1973a. A fake NP squish. In Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 96–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1973b. Slifting. In Maurice Gross, Morris Hell, & Marcel Schützenberger (eds.), The formal analysis of natural languages, 133–169. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1986. Infinite syntax! Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roussou, Anna. 2010. Selecting complementizers. Lingua 1201. 582–603. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rubio, Carlos. 2012. Topics first: A derivational approach to CLLD topicalization in Romance. Paper presented at Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 42, Southern Utah University.
Rullmann, Hotze & Jan-Wouter Zwart. 1996. On saying dat
. In Language and cognition 5. Year- book 1995 of the Research Group of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics of the University of Groningen, 179–194. Groningen: University of Groningen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. When right-dislocation meets the left periphery. A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus. Lingua 1161. 836–873. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2001. Syntax–phonology interface. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 15407–15412. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2003. Sentence phonology. In William Frawley & William Bright (eds.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, 41–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2005. Comments on international phrases in English. In Sónia Frota, Marina Vigário, & Maria João Freitas (eds.), Prosodies, 11–58. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax–phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sells, Peter. 1984. Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Amherst: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Shaer, Benjamin, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn (eds.). 2008. Dislocated elements in discourse. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaer, Benjamin & Werner Frey. 2004. “Integrated” and “non-integrated” left-peripheral elements in German and English. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, 465–502. Berlin: Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sturgeon, Anne. 2008b. Resumption in Czech left-dislocation: The syntax–phonology interface. In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn, & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Proceedings of FASL 161, 407–422. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suñer, Margarita. 2006. Left-dislocations with and without epithets. Probus 181. 127–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taglicht, Josef. 1998. Constraints on international phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 341. 181–211. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Temmerman, Tanja. 2013. The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: On the PF-theory of islands and the WH/sluicing correlation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 311. 235–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 151. 103–129.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 219–255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2014. Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott, & Mark de Vries (eds.), Parenthesis and ellipsis, 301–349. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, Enric. 2002. L’oració com a unitat informativa. In Joan Sol‘a, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català contempo-rani, 1221–1279. Barcelona: Editorial Empúries.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Spuy, Andrew. 1993. Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 901. 335–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villa-García, Julio. 2012. Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus 241. 257–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The syntax of sentence periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wagner, Michael. 2012. Contrastive topics decomposed. Semantics and Pragmatics 51. 1–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeller, Jochen. 2004. Left-dislocation in Zulu. Ms., University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Zeller, Jochen. 2006. On clitic left-dislocation in Zulu. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 181. 131–156.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)