Cover not available
Article published In:
Child Language Variation: Sociolinguistic and formal approaches
Edited by Véronique Lacoste and Lisa Green
[Linguistic Variation 16:1] 2016
► pp. 12–33

Acquisition of a rural variety

Glottalization in Vermont

Glottal stop is a widely reported phenomenon in the United Kingdom, but it has been rarely studied in the United States. The current study follows up on work on this feature in a wide age range of speakers in Vermont. Currently the speakers comprise thirty-six children ages 2;6 to 5 from this same location. In addition to demonstrating that these children have acquired the phonological constraints, as well as the full range of allophones of /t/, the results provide a lens through which to explore other issues of language acquisition and language variation, most notably, the boundary between dialectal and developmental variation. In general, it is argued that sociolinguistically conditioned variation adds empirical as well as theoretical value to studies of phonetically and phonologically conditioned variation and acquisition of the phonological system by first language learners.
Keywords: variation, sociolinguistics, language acquisition, glottalization, American English
Published online: 13 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16.1.02rob
References (38)
Andersen, Elaine. 1990. Speaking with style: The sociolinguistic skills of children. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henriette & David Sankoff. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 501. 333–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Laurence Beaud & Renata Varga. 2000. “Developmental data on a French sociolinguistic variable: The word-final post-consonantal /R/..” Variation and Change 12(3). 295–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerry, Paul Foulkes, James Milroy, & Lesley Milroy. 1997. Descriptive adequacy in phonology: A variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics 33(2). 275–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eddington, David & Michael Taylor. 2009. T-glottalization in American English. American Speech 84(3). 298–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John. 1958. Social influence of a linguistic variant. Word 141: 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 1980. Variation in the group and in the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In W. Labov (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory & Sally Boyd. 1990. The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change 21. 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, John & Jonathan Kaye. 1990. A tale of two cities: London glottaling and New York City tapping. The Linguistic Review 71. 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. 2009. Vermont accent becoming a thing of the past. Burlington Free Press. Burlington, Vermont.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 21. 65–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. New towns and koineization: Linguistic and social correlates. Linguistics 43(5). 1023–1048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1964. Stages in the acquisition of Standard English. In Roger Shuy, A. Davis & R. Hogan (eds.), Social dialects and language learning, 77–104. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 11. 85–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1983. Phonological Acquisition and Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 1977. Language, Social Class, and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacQuarrie, Brian. 2004. Talking Bah-k in Vermont: On secluded farm researcher strikes linguistic gold. Boston Globe. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Milroy, James, Leslie Milroy & Sue Hartley. 1994. Local and supra-local change in British English: The case of glottalization. English World-Wide 151. 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neu, Helene. 1980. Ranking of constraints on /t,d/ deletion in American English. In William Labov (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quay, Suzanne. 2008. Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. First Language 281. 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Euan. 1978. Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In P. Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, 158–171.London: Edwin Arnold.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. 1996. Acquisition of Variable Rules: (-t,d) Deletion and (ing) Production. IRCS Technical Papers. University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
. 1997. Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t,d) deletion. Journal of Child Language 241. 351–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997b. Hitting a moving target: Acquisition of sound change in progress by Philadelphia children. Language Variation and Change 91. 249–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. As old becomes new: Glottalization in Vermont. American Speech 81(3). 227–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Vermont Lowering? Raising some questions about (ay) and (aw) south of the Canadian border. Language Variation and Change 191. 181–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Child language variation. In Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 263–276. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie & William Labov. 1995. Learning to talk Philadelphian. Language Variation and Change 71. 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, John, Helen Lawrence & Sali Tagliamonte. 2001. Goldvarb 2001 A multivariate analysis application for Windows. [URL].Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1975. Linguistic variability in the speech of some Edinburgh schoolchildren. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David & William Labov. 1979. On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 81. 189–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ronald & Suzanne Scollon. 1981. Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham & Liane Fortune. 2007. ‘Mam, ma troosers is fa’in doon’: Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Universal, dialect specific and pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21(1). 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermont Business Roundtable (January, 1993). Working Paper: A critical look at Vermont's economy, past present and future. Burlington, VT.
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youssef, Valerie. 1991. Variation as a feature of language acquisition in the Trinidad context. Language Variation and Change 31. 75–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kushartanti, Bernadette, Hans Van de Velde & Martin B.H. Everaert
2021. Chapter 5. Acquiring social and linguistic competence. In Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Acquisition across the Lifespan [Studies in Language Variation, 26], ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Nesbitt, Monica & James N. Stanford
2021. Structure, Chronology, and Local Social Meaning of a Supra-Local Vowel Shift: Emergence of the Low-Back-Merger Shift in New England. Language Variation and Change 33:3 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.