More than one way out
On the factors influencing the loss of V to C movement
In this article I will show that there is not a single diachronic path that leads to the loss of the verb second
property so that different languages can have different ways towards a non V2 grammar. I will also show that the progressive loss
of subject inversion contexts is not the only factor that played a role in the change, because there are V2 languages in which
nominal subject inversion was never attested but they are still V2, i.e. they have I to C movement. I will identify various
factors which may play a role and are related to the type of verb second found in different languages. I will consider various
types of factors and show that they can play a role or not in the loss of V2 depending on the type of V2 that the language
displays. I will also identify an additional factor that has not been considered in the literature namely the type of
complementizer system: a change in this area can contribute to destabilizing the V2 grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Setting the problem
- 2.V2 types
- 2.1Combining with V2 and the split left periphery
- 2.2The loss of V2: From Old to Renaissance Italian
- 2.3What subject inversion tells us
- 3.A wider perspective
- 3.1Cimbrian
- 3.2Plodarisch
- 3.3The complex picture
- 4.Old Italian
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Notes
-
References
References (71)
References
Adams, Marianne. 1987. ‘From Old French to the Theory of pro-drop’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 51: 1–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alber, Birgit. 1994. Indizi per l’esistenza di uno split-CP nelle lingue germaniche. In: G. Borgato (ed.), Teoria del linguaggio e analisi linguistica. XX Incontro di grammatica generativa, 3–23. Padova: Unipress.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderssen, Merete & Westergaard, Marit. 2010. Frequency and Economy in the Acquisition of Variable Word Order. Lingua: 2569–2588. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. ‘Aspects of the low IP area’, In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 2008. The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 331. 191–204.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 2013. Revisiting the CP of Clefts. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann: Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, 91–114. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola. 2006. A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Raffaella Zanuttini (ed.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bocci, Giuliano & Cecilia Poletto. 2016. Syntactic and Prosodic Effects of Information Structure in Romance. In Caroline Féry and Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), in Handout of Information structure, 642–662. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bidese, Ermenegildo. 2008. Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tuebingen: Günter Narr Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli. 2007. The loss of V2 phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte 2101. 209–228.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli. 2013. Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli. 2012. A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 901. 1–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosco, Ilaria. 1999. Christlike unt korze dottrina. Un’analisi sintattica della lingua cimbra del XVII secolo. Padova: Padova University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2001. Proper Binding Condition Effects are Phase Impenetrability Condition Effects. In: Kim Minjoo &Uri Strauss, Proceedings of NELS 31, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cocchi, G., and C. Poletto. 2007. Complementizer deletion and complementizer doubling, in C. Picchi and A. Pona (eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Incontro di Grammatica generativa, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica – Università di Firenze, 49–62. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Ors.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, João. 2001. The Emergence of Unmarked Word Order. In Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner (eds), Optimality- Theoretic Syntax, 171–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuss, Eric. 2003. On the historical core of V2 in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 261. 195–231. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuss, Eric. 2008. Word order and language change. On the interface between syntax and morphology. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Frankfurt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grewendorf, Günther. 2008. The Left Clausal Periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left Dislocation in German. In Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn (eds), Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, 49–94. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Negative inversion and the structure of CP. Paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, University of Wuppertal.
Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation, Linguistische Berichte 51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaiser, Georg A. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Kampen, Jacqueline. 2010. Typological Guidance in the Acquisition of V2 Dutch. Lingua 120 (2): 264–83. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Joachim. 2015. Was für ein Hauptsatzphänomen ist V2? Talk delivered at the V2 Workshop Wuppertal
24.07.2015.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2003. ‘Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali. La doppia serie di complementatori’, Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 271: 89–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2007. Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations. In A. L. Lepschy, A. Tosi (eds), Languages of Italy: Histories and dictionaries, Ravena, Longo, 119–146.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2008. Satisfying V2 in early romance: Merge vs. move. Journal of Linguistics 441. 437–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 1995. Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement. In Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds), Clause Structure and Language Change, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David & Marit Westergaard. 2007. Language Acquisition and Language Change: Interrelationships. In Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (5): 396–416. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lohnstein, Horst. In press. The grammatical basis of verb second – the case of German. In Rebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe & Theresa Biberauer, Rethinking Verb Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa, vol. 31. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oniga, Renato. 2014. Latin. A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paoli, Sandra. 2007. The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects: Evidence from Romance. Lingua 1171. 1057–1079. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, Svetlana. 2015. Free word order in Germanic: Insights from object order in Middle Low German. Linguistische Berichte 2441, 355–382.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, David & Kenneth Wexler. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German. Language 691: 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2001. Complementizer deletion and verb movement in standard Italian. In: Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 265–286. Amsterdam: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Sief Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–42. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2006. Parallel phases: A study of the high and low periphery of Old Italian. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 261–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2014. Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, C. 2015. ‘Word order in the Old Italian DP’, in U. Shlonsky (ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 109–127. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia. 2016. Which clues for which V2. In Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola & Manuela Caterina Moroni (eds.), Theoretical approaches to linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia & Alessandra Tomaselli. 2002. La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: Cimbro e sappadino a confronto. In Gianna Marcato (ed.), La dialettologia oltre il 2001. Atti del convegno di Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 1–5 Luglio 2001, 237–252. Padova: Padova Unipress.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reis, Marga. 2016. Consecutive so … V2-clauses in German. In Ingo Reich und Augustin Speyer (eds), Co- and subordination in German and other languages, 285–318. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Renzi, Lorenzo & Giampaolo Salvi. 2010. Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rinke, Esther. 2007. Syntaktische Variation aus synchronischer und diachronischer Perspektive. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual Verb Second and the Wh-criterion. In Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, I. 2004. The C-system in Brythonnic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 297–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schreiber, Nina. 2010. Zur historischen Entwicklung des Komplementierers dass im Germanischen. PhD Thesis University of Frankfurt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz Bonnie, D. & Sten Vikner. 1989. All Verb Second Clauses are CPs. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 431, 27–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2005. A corpus-based study of null subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. In Claus D. Putsch, Johannes Kabatek & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, 359–74. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vance, B. 1989. Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vanelli, L. 1998. I dialetti italiani settentrionali nel panorama romanzo. Studi di sintassi e morfologia. Roma: Bulzoni.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wanner, Dieter. 1995. Les subordonnées à double complémentateur en roman medieval. In Giovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Section 1., 421–433.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2008. Acquisition and Change: On the Robustness of the Triggering Experience for Word Order Cues. Lingua. vol. 118 (12). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative. Germanic Linguistics 121. 49–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfe, Sam. 2015. Microvariation in Medieval Romance syntax: A comparative approach. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles. 2000. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella. (1997): Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Tomaselli, Alessandra & Ermenegildo Bidese
2023.
Fortune and Decay of Lexical Expletives in Germanic and Romance along the Adige River.
Languages 8:1
► pp. 44 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rossi, Silvia & Cecilia Poletto
Wolfe, Sam
2022.
Microvariation and Change in the Romance Left Periphery.
Probus 34:1
► pp. 235 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.