Cover not available
Review article published In:
Partitives cross-linguistically: Dimensions of variation
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Petra Sleeman
[Linguistic Variation 23:1] 2023
► pp. 1–27
Introductory article

Crosslinguistic variation in partitives

ORCID logo | University of Amsterdam
ORCID logo | University of Pavia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Partitive constructions and their developments
    • 2.1Partitive constructions
    • 2.2Partitive elements
  • 3.Variation in the morphological expression of partitivity
    • 3.1Partitive constructions
    • 3.2Partitive elements
      • 3.2.1Partitive pronouns
      • 3.2.2‘Generalized’ partitives
      • 3.2.3Partitives and differential object marking
  • 4.The contributions to this special issue
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21020.lur
References (75)
References
Badia Margarit, Antonio M. 1947. Los complementos pronominalo-adverbiales derivados de IBI e INDE en la peninsula ibérica. (= Anejos de la Revista de Filología Española 38). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar. 1952. Über das niederländische Adverbialpronomen er . Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 81. 5–32. Kopenhagen: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Berends, Sanne, Petra Sleeman, Aafke Hulk & Jeannette Schaeffer. 2021. The L2 acquisition of the referential semantics of Dutch partitive pronoun ER constructions. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 237–260. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Bosveld-de Smet, Leonie M. 1998. On mass and plural quantification. The case of French des/du-NP’s. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2006. The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. V1, 23–93. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Quantified expressions and quantitative clitics. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., 1–61. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in Italo-Romance. In Diego Pescarini & Roberta D’Alessandro (eds.), Advances in Italian dialectology: Sketches of Italo-Romance grammars, 135–161. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2020. Indefinite determiners in informal Italian: A preliminary analysis. Linguistics 58(3), 679–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, Anne. 2007. From preposition to article: The grammaticalization of the French partitive. Studies in Language 311. 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Du/Des NPs in French: a comparison with bare nouns in English and Spanish. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 77–108. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Carlier, Anne & Béatrice Lamiroy. 2014. The grammaticalization of the prepositional partitive in Romance. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 477–523. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass. 13(3): e12311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti, Luz & Silvia Luraghi. 2014. The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 443–476. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crispim, Maria de Lourdes. 1996. Artigos definidos e demonstrativos num corpus do séc. XIII. In Ivo Castro (ed.), Actas do XII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Vol. II: Linguística Histórica. História da Língua, 79–90. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2014. Partitive Subjects and Objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 417–442. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael. 2014. The second genitive in Russian. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 17–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberenz, Rolf. 2008. Ninguno quiere del agua turbia beber: sobre construcciones partitivas y su representación en algunos géneros textuales del español preclásico. In Johannes Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico. Nuevas perspectivas desde las Tradiciones Discursivas, 151–172. Madrid, Frankfurt a. M.: Iberoamericana, Vervuert.Google Scholar
Englebert, Annick. 1992. Le “petit mot” DE. Étude de sémantique historique. Geneva/Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2021. The partitive marker in Basque and its relation to bare nouns and the definite article. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 319–355. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli. 2019. Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4(1), p.111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2019. Special collection: Partitives. Glossa. [URL]
Fernández-Pena, Yolanda. 2020. Reconciling synchrony, diachrony and usage in verb number agreement with complex collective subjects. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1965. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Gerards, David Paul & Elisabeth Stark. 2020. Why “Partitive Articles” do not exist in (Old) Spanish. In Tabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article (Syntax & Semantics 43), 105–139. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2021. Partitivity in Italian: A protocol approach to a multifaceted phenomenon. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 33–76. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman. 2021. Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 1–30. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Glaser, Elvira. 1992. Umbau partitiver Strukturen in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Sprachwissenschaft 17(2). 113–132.Google Scholar
. 1993. Syntaktische Strategien zum Ausdruck von Indefinitheit und Partitivität im Deutschen (Standardsprache und Dialekt). In Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax, 99–116. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alive C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von & Jaklin Kornfilt. 2021. Turkish partitive constructions and (non-)exhaustivity. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 263–294. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Hoeksema, Jacob. 1996. Introduction. In Jacob Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions, 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1992. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. University of Groningen dissertation.
. 2003. Partitivity. In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot International state-of-the-article book, 179–212. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoop, Helen de & Andrej Malchukov. 2008. Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 391. 565–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2003. Incremental existence: the world according to the Finnish existential sentence. Linguistics 41(3). 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: The case of the Finnish object. Journal of Linguistics 46(1). 83–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions? Lingua 1331. 319–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. The partitive A: On uses of the Finnish partitive subject in transitive clauses. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), The diachronic typology of differential argument marking, 419–449. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
. 2021. Longitudinal or transverse? How the unbounded quantity expressed by the Finnish partitive case relates to time. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 295–317. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2013. Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 661. 378–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Gerson Klumpp. 2014. Introduction to the special issue “Differential Object Marking: theoretical and empirical issues”. Linguistics 521. 271–279.Google Scholar
Ihsane, Tabea. 2005. On the structure of French DU/DES ‘of the’ constituents. GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 41. 195–225.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2020. Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article (Syntax & Semantics 43). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihsane, Tabea & Elisabeth Stark (eds.). 2020. Shades of partitivity: Formal and areal properties. Special issue of Linguistics 58 (3).Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X’-Syntax: A study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jong, Franciska de. 1983. Sommige niet, andere wel: De verklaring van een raadselachtig verschil. GLOT 61. 229–246.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English Noun Phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In Wilhelm Geuder & Miriam Butt (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 265–307. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and Typology, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lubbe, H. F. A. van der. 1982. Over echte en schijnbare partitieve woordgroepen. Spektator 111. 367–378.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. MS. Partitives and differential marking of core arguments: A crosslinguistic survey. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pavia.
. 2013. Partitivi nel latino biblico. In Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 42(1). 41–60.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Giovanna Albonico. 2021. The partitive article in Old Italian. Early stages in the grammaticalization of the Italian partitive article. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 169–201. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn de Smit & Iván Igartua. 2020. Contact induced change in the languages of Europe: the rise and the development of partitive cases and determiners. Linguistics 58(3). 869–903. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo. 2014a. Introduction. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). 2014b. Partitive cases and related categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä. 2014. Typology and diachrony of partitive case markers. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 17–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2014. Partitives and negation: a cross-linguistic survey. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere, Arend Quak, Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs. 2003. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands, part 11. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [URL]
Rutkowski, Pawel. 2007. The syntactic structure of grammaticalized partitives (pseudopartitives). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1), Article 26. [URL]
Schutter, de G. 1992. Partitief of kwantitatief er, of over de verklaring van syntactische variatie. Taal en Tongval 44(1). 15–26.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. 2021. Diachronic typology of partitives. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580) 111–167. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra. 1998. The quantitative pronoun er in Dutch dialects. In Sjef Barbiers, Johan Rooryck & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Small words in the big picture: Squibs for Hans Bennis, 107–111. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra & Giuliana Giusti (eds.). 2021. Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane. 2016. Gender mismatches in partitive constructions with superlatives in French. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1(1), p.35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Convergence and divergence in the expression of partitivity in French, Dutch, and German. Linguistics 58(3). 767–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The L2 acquisition of the partitive pronoun en in French by L1 speakers of German and the role of the L1. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 205–236. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Stickney, Helen. 2004. The pseudopartitive and its illusory projections. Ms., University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Strobel, Thomas. 2017. Pronominale Partitivität: Arealität und Mikrovariation einer morphosyntaktischen Variable in den Varietäten des Deutschen. University of Frankfurt dissertation.
Swart, Henriette de. 2006. Aspectual implications of the semantics of plural indefinites. In Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 161–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamm, Anne. 2014. The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: from abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 89–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westveer, Thom. 2021. Gender mismatches in partitive constructions in French and German: How society shapes language. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1987. Paradigmaloos ‘van’. TABU, Bulletin voor Taalwetenschap 171. 184–192.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Espinal, M.Teresa & Giuliana Giusti
2024. On the property-denoting clitic ne and the determiner de/di: a comparative analysis of Catalan and Italian. Linguistics 62:2 ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Ivaska, Ilmari & Anne Tamm
2024. Same yet different. Linguistic Variation DOI logo
Sleeman, Petra
2024. Methods for studying variation in partitives. Linguistic Variation DOI logo
Paul, Ileana, Giuliana Giusti & Gianluca E. Lebani
2022. Variation in the Occurrence and Interpretation of Articles in Malagasy: A Comparison with Italian. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.