Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 23:2 (2023) ► pp.343378
References
Archangeli, Diana & Terence Langendoen
1997Optimality Theory. An overview. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Gleanda Newton & Michelle Sheehan
2009The Final-over-Final constraint and predictions for diachronic change. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 31, [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans
2000Against feature strength. The case of Scandinavian object shift. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 181: 673–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Derivations and evaluations: object shift in the Germanic languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011A typology of clause structure. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2010, eds. Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Johan Rooryck, 1–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Object shift and object scrambling. In The Cambridge handbook of Germanic linguistics, eds. Michael T. Putnam and B. Richard Page, 413–432. Cambridge (UK)/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
to appear a. Object shift and object scrambling in Germanic. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Germanic Linguistics eds. Jarich Hoekstra, Steffen Höder, Oliver Schallert and Freek Van de Velde Oxford Oxford University Press lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006444 DOI logo
to appear b. Scrambling of definite object NPs in Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde/Dutch Linguistics. lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/005818. DOI logo
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
2016Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases, volume 3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Joost Dekkers
2000The minimalist program and optimality theory: derivations and evaluations. In Optimality Theory: phonology, syntax and acquisition, eds. Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 386–422. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Ralf Vogel
(eds) 2013Linguistic derivations and filtering. Minimalism and optimality theory. Sheffield (UK)/Bristol (USA): Equinox.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Ellen Woolford
2013Minimalism and optimality theory. In The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, ed. Marcel Den Dikken, 122–161: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate
Chomsky, Noam
1986Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A life in Language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
2005Interfaces. Negation – syntax – brain, University of Aarhus: PhD thesis.
Cloutier, Robert A.
2008West Germanic OV and VO. The status of exceptions, University of Amsterdam: PhD thesis.
Costa, João
1998Word order variation. A constraint-based approach, University of Leiden: PhD thesis.
Dekkers, Joost, Frank Van der Leeuw & Jeroen Van de Weijer
(eds) 2000Optimality theory: phonology, syntax and acquisition Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1997Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 171: 369–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly & Eloise Jelinek
1995Distiributing arguments. Natural Language Semantics 31: 123–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1978The verbal complex V′–V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 91: 49–77.Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J.
2022Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1997Projection, heads and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 281: 373–422.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2020A null theory of scrambling. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 391: 375–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English, University of Stockholm: PhD thesis.
Johnson, Kyle
1991Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 91: 577–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 11: 128–191. [Also published as chapter 13 in Parameters and universals. Oxford University Press (2000)].Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf
2006Shape conservation, Holmberg’s generalization and predication. In Comparatieve studies in Germanic syntax, eds. Jutta M. Hartmann and László Molnárfi. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komen, Erwin
2013Finding focus: a study of the historical development of focus in English, Radboud Universiteit: PhD thesis.
Lasnik, Howard
1999Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine, Michael T. Putnam, Henriëtte De Swart & Zaroukian
(eds) 2016Optimality-theoretic syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: From uni- to bidirectional optimization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sander, Geertje Van Bergen & Peter De Swart
2016On the origin of constraints. In Optimality-theoretic syntax, semantics and pragmatics. From uni- to bidirectional optimization, 179–199. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Wolfgang Sternefeld
(eds) 2001Competition in Syntax. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 201: 365–424.Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael T.
2007Scrambling and the Survive Principle. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan
2022Definite objects in the wild: a converging evidence approach to scrambling in the Dutch middle-field, Radboud University Nijmegen: PhD thesis.
Sells, Peter
2001Structure, alignment and optimality in Swedish. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker
2017Against information structure heads: a relational analysis of German scrambling. Glossa 21: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struik, Tara
2022Information structure triggers for word order varation and change: The OV/VO alternation in the West Germanic languages, Radboud University Nijmegen: PhD thesis.
Struik, Tara & Gert-Jan Schoenmakers
to appear. When information structure exploits syntax: the relation between the loss of VO and scrambling in Dutch. Journal of Linguistics. DOI logo
Struik, Tara & Ans Van Kemenade
2020On the givenness of OV word order: A (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 241: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2022Information structure and OV word order in Old and Middle English: a phase-based approach. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 251: 79–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2011The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English Catalan Journal of Linguistics 101: 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight, and information status. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, eds. Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, 835–845. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dorderecht/Providence: Foris Publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
1986Linguistic theory and the function of word order in Dutch. A study on interpretive aspects of the order of adverbials and noun phrases. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar