Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 24:1 (2024) ► pp.1–36

From a movement verb to an epistemic discourse marker

The diachronic change of Spanish vaya

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
ORCID logo | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Besides its main use as a form of the movement verb ir ‘to go’, the Spanish form vaya (lit. go) is also used as a verbal discourse marker. Here we trace this transition from a purely verbal form to a discourse marker by searching a historical corpus of documents in Spanish, which reveals the increasing use over time of vaya in exclamatives to replace a presentational construction. We focus on vaya in isolation and in combination with an indefinite DP or a bare NP. We analyze the meaning of vaya as an epistemic discourse marker, by means of which the speaker expresses a judgment, a subjective epistemic and evidential evaluation of a proposition accessible from context. We postulate that these constructions sit in a Judgment Phrase at the syntactic-pragmatic interface (Krifka 2020), a position to which vaya also moves when its meaning is that of an expressive intensifier that directly modifies over one or more (contextually salient) properties of the noun contained in the DP/NP.
Keywords: verbal discourse marker, epistemicity, expressivity, exclamatives
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • A.VDMs are not predicates and therefore do not show argument selection
    • B.VDMs tend to be invariable morphophonologically
    • C.VDMs show syntactic weakening and decategorization
    • D.VDMs introduce a special type of procedural meaning (Sperber & Wilson 1986)
    • E.VDMs convey (inter)subjectification
  • 2.The diachronic development of vaya
  • 3.Vaya in expressives and exclamatives
    • 3.1Expressives
    • 3.2Exclamatives
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Vaya as an interjection
    • 4.2Vaya + indefinite DP and vaya + NP
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22006.esp
References (76)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning: the pragmatics and semantics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde. 2014. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and descriptive advances. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castroviejo, Elena. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7(1). 41–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Exclamatives. In Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Avis, Franz-Josef. 2002. On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics. 28(1). 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. 8 Exklamativsatz. In Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 171–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Exclamatives, Normalcy Conditions and Common Ground. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique. 401. 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens. 2010. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Olga Fernández-Soriano. 2013. Evidentials dizque and que in Spanish. Grammaticalization, parameters and the (fine) structure of Comp. Lingüística 81. 211–234.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & Xavier Villalba. In press. Marcadores de discurso deverbales. In Concepción Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis Histórica de la Lengua Española, Vol. IV1. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Geurts, Bart. 2019. Communication as commitment sharing: Speech acts, implicatures, common ground. Theoretical Linguistics. 45(1–2). 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli. 2014. (eds.). Discourse and pragmatic markers from Latin to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 1996. The semantics of exclamatives. In Edward Garrett & Felicia Lee (eds.), Syntax at Sunset. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 146–162. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
. 2001. Spanish exclamatives and the interpretation of the left periphery. In Johan Rooryck, Yves de Hulst & Jan Schroten (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999, 167–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Spanish root exclamatives at the syntax/semantics interface. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 71. 117–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2019. The grammar of expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Katharina Turgay. 2014. Expressive intensifiers and external degree modification. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17(3). 185–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.). Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6). 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2004. Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2010. Why isn’t this a complementizer? In Comparisons and contrasts, 190–227. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2015. Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated questions, and question tags. In Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney, & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 25 1, 328–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions. In Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Commitments and beyond. Theoretical Linguistics.ç 45(1–2). 73–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Layers of assertive clauses: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. In Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirier./Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2021. Modelling Questions in commitment spaces. In Moritz Cordes (ed.), Asking and answering: Rivalling approaches to interrogative methods, 63–95. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre & Cecilia Poletto. 2018. Mapping the syntacticisation of discourse: The case of sentential particles. Foundation for Italian Studies Working Papers 11, 45–66.Google Scholar
Liebert, Wolf-Andreas, Gisela Redeker & Linda R. Waugh. 1997. Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. 2014. The Romance k-complementizers. In Peter Svenonius (Ed.), Functional structure from top to toe, 148–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marandin, Jean-Marie. 2008. The exclamative clause type in French. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th HPSG Conference, 436–456. Stanford: CSLI Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Raible & Wulf Österreicher (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol. 21, 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2015. (Inter) subjectification and its limits in secondary grammaticalization. Language Sciences 471. 148–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Octavio de Toledo, Álvaro. 2001. ¿Un viaje de ida y vuelta?: La gramaticalización de “vaya” como marcador y cuantificador. Anuari de Filologia. Secció F, Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 111. 47–72.Google Scholar
Ortiz Cruz, Demelsa. 2011. En torno a la gramaticalización de vaya como interjección. In Elena Carmona & Santiago del Rey Quesada (eds.), Id est, loquetin peritia: aportaciones a la lingüística diacrónica de los jóvenes investigadores de Historiografia e Historia, 323–333. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, & Emanuela Sanfelici. 2018. On relative complementizers and relative pronouns. Linguistic Variation 18 (2). 265–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul & Raffaella Zanuttini. 2004. The semantics of nominal exclamatives. In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 57–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Chris. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2010. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
. 2021. Diccionario de la lengua española, [v. 23.5 online]. [URL] (March 22nd, 2022).
Real-Puigdollers, Cristina, M. Teresa Espinal & Xavier Villalba. 2022. Vaya in Spanish. From a judgement to a commitment marker. Ms. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34(5). 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The Semantics of Emotive Markers and Other Illocutionary Content. Journal of Semantics. 38(2). 305–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Inger. 1992. Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. In Inger Rosengren (ed.), Satz und Illokution. vol. 11, 263–306. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Expressive sentence types: A contradiction in terms. The case of exclamation. In Toril Swan & Olaf Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 38–68. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume I: Clause structure, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina & Álvaro Octavio de Toledo. 2010. À propos de la distribution et de l’évolution des schémas de quantification interrogative et exclamative dans les langues romanes. In Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Paul Danler (eds.), Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, 507–522. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2017. Mirativity in Spanish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 15(2). 489–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sassoon, Galit Weidman. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics 30(3). 335–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sassoon, Galit Weidman & Julie Fadlon. 2017. The role of dimensions in classification under predicates predicts their status in degree constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tanghe, Sanne. 2013. Acerca de los intensificadores vaya y qué: un estudio comparativo. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 90(7). 751–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Marcadores derivados de verbos de movimiento. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tirado, Irene. 2016. Aproximación sintáctica a las oraciones exclamativas del español. Borealis 5(2). 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Bernd Heine. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Historical pragmatics. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1(1). 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier. 2008. Exclamatives: A thematic guide with many questions and few answers. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 71. 9–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Exclamatives, imperatives, optatives. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (Eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalba, Xavier & Anna Bartra-Kaufmann. 2010. Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4). 819–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1). 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Villalba, Xavier
2024. Romance exclamative markers at the syntax-pragmatics interface: A compositional approach to exclamativity. Journal of Pragmatics 226 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Villa-García, Julio
2023. Cº realizations along the left edge across English and Spanish. Languages 8:4 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.