Article published In:
Linguistic Variation: Online-First ArticlesMultifunctionality and contextual realization
A case study in Yixing Chinese
This paper aims to make a contribution to the study of the nature of syntactic categories by analysing a single
element in a single language, namely the marker -lao in Yixing Chinese. Although this marker has previously been
analysed as an adjectivaliser (Hu and Perry 2018), we show that it has a much broader
range of uses. We suggest that the bulk of cases can be captured in a unified way by supposing that the marker in question
displays a type of possessive semantics (which we label possession-as-attribute), which is defined by delineating
a kind (in the sense of e.g. Carlson 1977; Chierchia 1998), with similar semantics being expressed by adjectival elements in languages such as
English. It is observed, however, that this meaning can emerge in the absence of the marker -lao, and that
-lao can, in a restricted set of cases, surface in the absence of this meaning, and we suggest that these
facts are attributable to the diachronic development of the marker and can be captured synchronically by making use of
late-insertion mechanisms for phonological and semantic features. We propose that the case of -lao provides a
suggestive argument for a substance-free approach to syntactic features, whereby syntactic features are not
inherently specified for interface interpretations. Other cross-linguistic implications of our analysis are noted, in particular
for the representation of adjectives.
Keywords: Yixing Chinese, Minimalist Syntax, Distributed Morphology, contextual allomorphy, contextual allosemy, adjectives
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Outline
- 1.2Yixing Chinese
- 2.Linking elements in yixing
- 3.
-lao is not (just) an a head
- 3.1Non-adjectival material with -lao
- 3.1.1Nouns with -lao
- 3.1.2Verbal and clausal material with -lao
- 3.2Adjectival material without -lao
- 3.1Non-adjectival material with -lao
- 4.The semantics of -lao and contextual allosemy
- 4.1 -lao and possessive semantics
- 5.Contextual allomorphy
- 5.1Aside: Contrasting adjectival constructions in yixing and mandarin
- 6.
-lao as nominalizer and contextual allosemy
- 6.1 -lao, negation and interrogatives
- 7.Implications
- 7.1Substance-free syntactic features
- 7.2Additional implications
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (78)
Baker, Mark & William Croft. 2017. Lexical
categories: legacy, lacuna, and opportunities for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review
of Linguistics 31. 179–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beard, Robert. 1976. Once
more on the analysis of ed-adjectives. Journal of
Linguistics 12(1). 155–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beck, David. 2002. The
typology of parts of speech systems: the markedness of
adjectives. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to kinds in
English. University of Massachusetts, Amherst
dissertation.
Chafe, Wallace. 2012. Are
adjectives universal? the case of Northern Iroquoian. Linguistic
Typology 16(1). 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chan, Marjorie & Hongmo Ren. 1989. Wuxi
tone sandhi: from last to first syllable dominance. Acta Linguista
Hafniensia 211. 35–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1926. 北京,
蘇州,常州語助詞的研究 [A study of particles in Beijing, Suzhou and Changzhou
dialects]. 清華學報 [Tsing Hua journal
of Chinese
studies] 31. 580–587.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 2009. De
的 as an underspecified classifier: first explorations. 语言学论丛 [Yuyanxue
Luncong] 391. 1–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference
to kinds across language. Natural Language
Semantics 6(4). 339–405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks
on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings
in english transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Sandra. 2012. Are
lexical categories universal? the view from chamorro. Theoretical
Linguistics 38(1–2). 1–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. Where
have all the adjectives gone? Studies in
Language 11. 1–80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.). 2004. Adjective
classes: a crosslinguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffield, Nigel. 2017. On
what projects in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics 26(4). 351–387. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement
operations after syntax. Linguistic
Inquiry 32(4). 555–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernst, Thomas. 1995. Negation
in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 13(4). 665–707. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The
myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive
science. Behavioral and Brain Sci
ences 321. 429–492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francez, Itamar & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2015. Semantic
variation and the grammar of property
concepts. Language 91(3). 533–563. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, Elaine J. & Stephen Matthews. 2005. A
multi-dimensional approach to the category ‘verb’ in Cantonese. Journal of
Linguistics 41(2). 269–305. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gil, David. 2005. Word
order without syntactic categories: how Riau Indonesian does
it. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Sheila Ann Dooley (eds.), Verb
first: on the syntax of verb-initial
languages, 243–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grano, Thomas. 2012. Mandarin
hen and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory 30(2). 513–565. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed
morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The
view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established
categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic
Typology 11(1). 119–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2010. Comparative
concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic
studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirtle, W. H. 1970. -ed
adjectives like ‘verandahed’ and ‘blue-eyed’. Journal of
Linguistics 6(1). 19–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Xuhui. 2023. Bundling
telicity, verbal quantification and perfective aspect: a study on lә in Yixing Chinese. Journal
of Linguistics (FirstView). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Xuhui & J. Joseph Perry. 2018. The
syntax and phonology of non-compositional compounds in Yixing Chinese. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory 36(3). 701–742. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, He. 2016. 荆音韵汇:两百年前的宜兴话 [Jing Yin Yun Hui: Yixing dialect two hundred
years ago]. Shanghai: Zhong Xi Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2017a. 从地理语言学的角度看地名学的语言学功能 [A geolinguistic approach to
toponymy]. 中國言語硏究 [Studies in
Chinese
Language] 811. 301–316.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2017b. 同音冲突的地理格局触发官话化 [Mandarinization triggered by the
geographical pattern of homonymic collision]. 语言学论丛 [Yuyanxue
Lungcong] 561. 76–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2017c. 多维接触与语言扩散模型 [Multidimensional contact and language
diffusion models]. 中国语文 [Studies
of the Chinese
Language] 3841. 313–322.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2017d. 社会地理语言学视野下的微观方言研究 [Microstudies of dialects from the view
of social and geographical linguistics]. Peking University dissertation.
Huang, Zhaoyan. 2005. 方言“佬”的性质 [The nature of ‘lao’ in
dialects]. 广西社会科学 [Journal of
Guangxi Social
Sciences] 61. 164–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaufman, Daniel. 2012. Austronesian
nominalism and its consequences: a Tagalog case study. Theoretical
Linguistics 35(1). 1–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity:
an introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The
generic
book, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2012.
de in
Mandarin e in Taiwanese. Studies in Chinese
Linguistics 33(1). 17–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Jo-wang. 2010. A
tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: a response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic
Inquiry 41(2). 305–329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No
escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own
lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in
Linguistics 4(2). 201–225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marvin, Tatjana. 2002. Topics
in the stress and syntax of words. MIT dissertation.
McCawley, James D. 1992. Justifying part-of-speech
assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics 20(2). 211–245.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitrović, Moreno & Phoevos Panagiotidis. 2020. Adjectives
exist, adjectivisers do not: a bicategorial
typology. Glossa 5(1). 58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew & Neil Myler. 2014. A
brown-eyed girl. UCLA Working Papers in
Linguistics 181. 243–257.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna. 1988. On
alienable and inalienable possession. In William Shipley (ed.), In
honor of Mary
Haas, 557–610. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2013. Possessive
classification. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The
world atlas of language structures
(online). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Waltraud. 2005a. Adjectival
modification in Mandarin Chinese and related
issues. Linguistics 43(4). 757–793. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2005b. Adjectives
in Mandarin Chinese: the rehabilitation of a much ostracized
category. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives:
formal analyses in syntax and
semantics, 243–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2012. Why
Chinese de is not like French de: a critical analysis of the predicational approach to
nominal modification. Studies in Chinese
Linguistics 33(3). 183–201.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perry, J. Joseph. 2016. Tone and prosodic
constituency in Gyalsumdo. University of Cambridge dissertation.
. Ms. Mapping and pruning: an
approach to prosodification. Available at: [URL]
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. “Some
do and some doesn’t”: verbal concord variation in the north of the British
Isles. In Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner (eds.), A
comparative grammar of British English
dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shi, Youwei. 1982. 常州方言的“佬” [‘Lao’ in Changzhou
dialect]. 中国语文 [Studies of the
Chinese
Language] (3). 208–214.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, William. 2012. Parameter
theory and motion predicates. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity,
change and state: a categorial view of event
structure, 279–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tham, Shiao Wei. 2013. Change of state verbs and
result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of
Linguistics 49(3). 647–701. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wetzer, Harrie. 1996. Nouniness
and verbiness: a typological study of adjectival
predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2023. Icelandic
nominalizations and allosemy. Manuscript available at: [URL]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz. 2017. The
interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The
verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yip, Virginia & Stephen Matthews. 2011. Cantonese:
a comprehensive grammar (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
You, Xiaohui. 2004. 浅谈“佬” 字的音义 [An initial discussion of the sound and
meaning of ‘lao’]. 西南民族大学学报 [Journal of Southwest Minzu
University] 61. 359–360.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2008. On
the syntactic flexibility of formal features. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The
limits of syntactic
variation, 143–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2020. Labeling,
selection and feature checking. In Peter W. Smith, Johannes Mursell & Katharina Hartmann (eds.), Agree
to agree: agreement in the Minimalist
Programme, 31–70. Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)