Article published In:
Linguistic Variation: Online-First ArticlesMicrovariation in verbal rather
This paper uses survey results to analyze patterns of judgments across different versions of the non-standard
verbal use of the word rather, which can take participial morphology, as in rathered. Across
numerous possible instantiations of the construction, there appear to be in fact a quite limited number of grammars, which are
generated by an implicational hierarchy of functional heads, along with the availability of a silent verb have. The
overall picture supports several broader conclusions. First, bare-infinitive–selecting verbs are nearly “closed class” because
they have special syntactic properties that go beyond semantic or even syntactic selection: they must value the temporal verbal
features of the embedded verb, or else provide a structural context for such valuation. Second, silent verbs can be licensed by
head-moving to a modal head in the extended projection. This movement is freely available, but silence demands recoverability,
which limits its application only to certain verbs, and certain uses/meanings of those verbs. Third, in addition to previously
known configurations for building parasitic participle constructions, movement of a lower verb to a higher verb can extend the
phase of the lower verb and lead to its silence. Fourth, the distribution of rather suggests that volitional
meaning is not a primitive, but is constructed from smaller primitives. Finally, microvariation reveals a tight connection among
logically distinct functional heads, suggesting that they are not acquired independently of each other, but interact in
significant ways.
Keywords: verbal rather, modals, microvariation, dialect syntax, m-merger, verbhood, silent verbs, volition, reverse agree, parasitic participles, morphology, syntax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Overview
- 2.1Licensing of silent verbs
- 2.2Nearly closed class kind of verb in the first place
- 2.3Parasitic participles
- 2.4Restricted distribution
- 2.5Microvariation
- 3.The structure of verbal rather
- 3.1 Wood (2013)
- 3.2The present study
- 4.Microvariation and the parameter space
- 4.1Modvolition[+Inf] → Modvolition[+Asp]
- 4.2Modvolition[+Asp] → Modvolition[+have]
- 4.3If you have one have, you have all the haves
- 4.4Accounting for one-way correlations in judgments
- 5.Further microvariation
- 5.1A note on sooner
- 5.2Adjunction to Modvolition
- 5.3What kind of “have”?
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 25 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22026.woo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22026.woo
References (48)
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive
Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding. Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs
and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic
Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2006. Restructuring
and Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume
4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators
and linkers: the syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. 2010. Directions
from the GET-GO. On the syntax of manner-of-motion verbs in directional constructions. Catalan
Journal of Linguistics 91: 23–53.
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2011. The Ghost of the Old Norse
Subjunctive: the Norwegian Subjunctive Participle. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen
Linguistik 52 (3): 1–28.
Harves, Stephanie. 2008. Intensional
Transitives and Silent have: Distinguishing between Want and
Need. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, eds. Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 211–219. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Harves, Stephanie, and Richard S. Kayne. 2012. Having
need and needing have
. Linguistic
Inquiry 43 (1): 120–132.
Harves, Stephanie, and Neil Myler. 2014. Licensing
NPIs and Licensing Silence: Have/Be Yet To in
English. Lingua 1481: 213–239.
Hasty, J. Daniel. 2014. We might should be thinking
this way: Theory and practice in the study of syntactic
variation. In Micro-syntactic variation in North American
English, eds. Raffaella Zanuttini and Laurence R. Horn, 269–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Gregory II. 2014. Restructuring
and Infinitives: The View from Appalachia. Doctoral
Dissertation, Michigan State University.
Juge, Matthew L. 2002. Unidirectionality in
grammaticalization and lexical shift: The case of English rather. Annual Meeting of the
Berkeley Linguistics
Society 28 (1): 147–154.
2006. On Parameters and on Principles
of Pronunciation. In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor
of Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huybregts, U. Kleinhenz, and J. Koster, 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2009. A note on auxiliary alternations
and silent causation. In Le français d’un continent à l’autre.
Mélanges offerts à Yves Charles Morin, eds. Luc Baronian and France Martineau, 211–235. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Klippenstein, Rachel. 2012. The
Behavior-before-Coding Principle in morphosyntactic change: evidence from verbal
rather
. Extended Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of
America. [URL].
McCawley, James D. 1973. On identifying the remains of
deceased clauses. Language
Research 9 (2): 73–83.
. 2001. Færøysk i vestnordisk
språkhistorie. In Moderne lingvistiske teorier og
færøsk, eds. Kurt Braunmüller and Jógvan íLon Jacobsen, 125–154. Oslo: Novus Press.
. 2003. Språkendringar med eller
utan kontakt i Vest-Norden? In ÚtnorDur. West Nordic standardisation
and variation. Papers from a Symposium in Stockholm October 7th 2001, ed. Kristján Árnason, 81–110. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics.
Snorrason, Oddur. 2022. Faroese
infinitival clauses: Perfective aspect and parasitic morphology. M.Phil.
dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Tyler, Matthew. 2019. Simplifying
match word: Evidence from English functional categories. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics 4 (1).
Tyler, Matthew, and Jim Wood. 2019. Microvariation
in the have yet to construction. Linguistic
Variation 19 (2): 232–279.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Economy,
Innovation, and Prescriptivism: From Spec to Head and Head to Head. Journal of Comparative
Germanic Linguistics 71: 59–98.
Van Linden, An. 2015. Comparative
modals: (dis)similar diachronic tendencies. Functions of
Language 22 (2): 192–231.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2002. The
unbearable lightness of GOing: The projection parameter as a pure parameter governing the distribution of elliptic motion
verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic
Linguistics 51: 143–196.
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2001. Dressing
up for Vocabulary Insertion: the parasitic supine. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory 191: 199–228.
. 2007. The
Syntax of Tenselessness: Tense/Mood/Aspect-Agreeing Infinitivals. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wood, Jim, and Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson. 2014.
Let-causatives
and (a)symmetric dat-nom
constructions. Syntax 17 (3): 269–298.
Wood, Jim, Ian Neidel, Sasha Lioutikova, Luke Lindemann, Lydia Lee, and Josephine Holubkov. 2020. The
YGDP Mapbook: Survey Results 2015–2019. Yale Working Papers in Grammatical
Diversity 2 (4). [URL]
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2010. Parasitic
morphology in Germanic: Consequences for the theory of feature
checking. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.
. 2012a. Agree(ment)
& dynamic phases: No long-distance
Agree. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.
. 2012b. Parasitic
participles: Evidence for the theory of verb clusters. Taal en
Tongval 641: 129–156.
. 2012c. The
syntax of valuation in auxiliary–participle constructions. In Coyote
Working Papers: Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL
29), ed. Jaehoon Choi et al., 154–162. University of Arizona, Tucson.