References
Barbiers, Sjef
2017Kwantitatief er en ze [Quantitative er and ze ]. Nederlandse Taalkunde 22(2). 163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
1981The syntax of “NE”. Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1(2). 117–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennis, Hans
1986Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Berends, Sanne
2019Acquiring Dutch quantitative ER. Amsterdam: LOT.Google Scholar
Blom, Alied
1977Het kwantitatieve er [The quantitative pronoun er ]. Spektator 61. 387–395.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
1999Expletive split: Existentials and presentationals. North East Linguistics Society 29(2). Article 6. [URL]
Brassé, Paul & Willem van Schelven
1980Assimilatie van vooroorlogse immigranten, drie generaties Polen, Slovenen, Italianen in Heerlen [Assimilation of pre-war immigrants, three generations of Poles, Slovenians, Italians in Heerlen]. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans
2013Syntax of Dutch. Adpositions and adpositional phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2005Syntactic variation and spoken language. In Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colleman, Timothy, Johan De Caluwe, Walter Haeseryn, Ronny Boogaart, Frank Landsbergen, Johan Van Hoorde
2021Electronic ANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst) [Dutch Reference Grammar].Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie
1994Syntactische variatie in het algemeen Nederlands van Heerlen [Syntactic variation in Heerlen Dutch]. Amsterdam: IFOTT, University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
1998Syntactic variation, parameters and their social distribution. Language Variation and Change 10(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Heerlens Nederlands [Heerlen Dutch]. The Hague: Sdu.Google Scholar
2013Recent developments in the Limburg dialect region. In Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 31: Dutch, 378–399. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014bLanguage contact, linguistic variability and the construction of local identities. In Tor A. Åfarlí & Brit Mæhlum (eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar, 67–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Aafke Hulk
1996Ergative reflexives in Heerlen Dutch and French. Studia Linguistica 50(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert
1997The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 151. 289–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, Marjo van Koppen, Huib Kranendonk & Mirjam Rigterink
2011Database Diversity in Dutch DP Design (DDiDD). Utrecht, UiL-OTS. [URL]
Döhmer, Caroline
2018A new perspective on the Luxembourgish genitive. In Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon & Christian Zimmer (eds.), Germanic genitives (Studies in Language Companion Series 193), 15–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
2021Partitivity in Italian: A Protocol approach to a multifaceted phenomenon. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: De Gruyter, 33–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Elvira
1992Umbau partitiver Strukturen in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Sprachwissenschaft 17(2). 113–132.Google Scholar
1993Syntaktische Strategien zum Ausdruck von Indefinitheit und Partitivität im Deutschen (Standardsprache und Dialekt). In Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds.), Dialektsyntax, 99–116. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Syntaktische Raumbilder. In Peter Ernst & Franz Patocka (eds.), Dialektgeographie der Zukunft, 85–111. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan
2009Woordvolgorde in presentatieve zinnen en de theoretische basis van multi-factoriële grammatica [The word order of presentational sentences and the theoretical basis of multifactorial grammar]. Nederlandse Taalkunde 14(3). 282–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten van den Toorn
1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst [Dutch reference grammar], 2nd edn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hanse, Joseph
1987Nouveau dictionnaire des difficultés du français moderne, 2nd revised edn. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Hermans, Ben
2013Phonological features of Limburgian dialects. In Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 31: Dutch, 336–356. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1981ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12(1). 93–133.Google Scholar
Kranendonk, Huib
2010Quantificational constructions in the nominal domain: Facets of Dutch microvariation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 11. 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattens, Wim
1987Het partitieve ER in de ANS [The partitive pronoun ER in the Dutch Reference Grammar]. Nederlands van NU 351. 68–77.Google Scholar
Rooij, Jaap de
1991Regionale variatie en gebruik van ER II [Regional variation and use of ER II]. Taal en Tongval 431. 18–46.Google Scholar
Schutter, Georges de
1992Partitief of kwantitatief ER, of over de verklaring van syntactische variatie [Partitive or quantitative ER, or about the explanation of syntactic variation]. Taal en Tongval 44(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra
1998The quantitative pronoun ER in Dutch dialects. In Sjef Barbiers, Johan Rooryck & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Small words in the big picture. Squibs for Hans Bennis, 107–111. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
2023Partitive pronouns in intransitive contexts in Italian and Dutch. In Silvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically. Dimensions of variation. Special issue of Linguistic Variation 23(1). 217–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2024The partitive pronoun ER in two national varieties of standard Dutch. In Elvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language). Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane
2020Convergence and divergence in the expression of partitivity in French, Dutch, and German. Linguistics 58(3). 767–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobel, Thomas
2013On the spatial structure of the syntactic variable ‘pronominal partitivity’ in German dialects. In Ernestina Carrilho, Catarina Magro & Xosé Álvarez (eds.), Current approaches to limits and areas in dialectology, 399–435. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2016Die syntaktische Variable ‘pronominale Partitivität’ in den deutschen Dialekten. In Alexandra N. Lenz & Franz Patocka (eds.), Syntaktische Variation: Areallinguistische Perspektiven, 151–197. Vienna: Wiener Arbeiten zur Linguistik. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Pronominale Partitivität. Arealität und Mikrovariation einer morphosyntaktischen Variable in den Varietäten des Deutschen. Frankfurt: University of Frankfurt dissertation.