Cover not available
Part of
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 45–62

Narrative experiences of metaphor

| Stony Brook University
| Stony Brook University
This chapter discusses the impact of narrative contexts on readers’ experiences of metaphor. We begin by reviewing extant theories of metaphor processing to offer an analysis of contextual effects on readers’ metaphor understanding. Next, we outline a dual process perspective that suggests how readers’ experiences of metaphor are guided by both intuitive and reflective processes. We suggest that the separate function of those processes may transform readers’ experiences of metaphor quality. Finally, we explore readers’ individual responses to metaphors as a product of their accumulation of knowledge through distinct life experiences. Throughout the chapter, we support our analyses with examples from the Pulitzer Prize winning novel Less (Greer, 2017).
Keywords: narrative, context, dual processes, individual differences
Article outline
  • Metaphor processing in narrative contexts
  • Dual processes in narrative
    • Intuitive judgments in narrative experiences
    • Reflective judgments in narrative experiences
  • Readers’ distinct narrative experiences
  • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.02ger
References (41)
References
Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2019). Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context. Discourse Processes, 56, 77–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C. (2017, July 24). Less by Andrew Sean Greer [Review of the book Less, A. S. Greer]. New York Times. Retrieved from: [URL]
Campbell, S. J., & Raney, G. (2016). A 25-year replication of Katz et al.’s (1988) metaphor norms. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 330–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 42–67). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diederich, A., & Trueblood, J. S. (2018). A dynamic dual process model of risky decision making. Psychological Review, 125, 270–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaggio, P., & Monash, P. (1976). Carrie [Motion picture]. United States: Red Bank Films.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G. (2015). More of different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register comparison. Language and Literature, 24, 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F. (1988). On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 416–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Readers’ responses when characters act on completed goals: Impact of characters’ mental states and readers’ task focus. Discourse Processes, 51, 312–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2008). Metaphor as structure mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 110–128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Egidi, G. (2010). The Bushwhacked Piano and the bushwhacked reader: The willing construction of disbelief. Style, 44, 189–206.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Healy, A. F. (1983). Dual processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 667–675.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Mumper, M. M. (2017). How readers’ lives affect narrative experiences. In M. Burke & E. Troscianko (Eds.), Dialogues Between Literature and Cognition (239–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 145–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grayot, J. D. (2020). Dual process theories in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics: A critical review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11, 105–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greer, A. S. (2017). Less. New York: Lee Boudreaux Books/Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1001–1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 641–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Laemmle, C., & Whale, J. (1931). Frankenstein. The man who made a monster [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cognitive theories in discourse-processing research. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 19–41). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merrill, G., & Rubicam, S. (1986). I wanna dance with somebody [Recorded by W. Houston]. On Whitney. New York, NY: Arista.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI_Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53, 326–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Gueraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 979–991.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.Google Scholar
Olidort, S. (2017, July 27). Andrew Sean Greer’s ‘Less’ in need of something more [Review of the book Less, by A. S. Greer]. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N. (2014). Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rataj, K., Przekoracka-Krawcyzk, A., & van der Lubbe, R. H. J. (2018). On understanding creative language: The late positive complex and novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1678, 231–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain- related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., Sikos, L., & Durgin, F. H. (2018). Are subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric sentences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 759–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Colston, Herbert L.
2024. A look at, inside, and outside metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Gerrig, Richard J.
2024.  Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory , by Gerard J., Steen Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023, xv, 355 pp., $165 (hardbound), ISBN: 9789027213853, $165 (e-Book), ISBN: 9789027249777. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.26 . Metaphor and Symbol 39:3 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.