Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:2 (2018) ► pp.269284
References (22)
References
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. (2008), “Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items”, Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 321, 668–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2007). Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 21, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drews, E. and P. Zwitserlood (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 211, 1098–1116.Google Scholar
Gagné, C. (2017). Psycholinguistic Approaches to Morphology. In M. Aronoff (Ed). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, B., Inhoff, A. W. & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20:1–2, 291–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V. & Bertram, R. (2013). Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28:7, 939–966. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Jarema, G., & Libben, G. (forthcoming). Polylogues and the menal lexicon – then and now. in Libben, G., Jarema, G., & Kuperman, V. (Eds.) Polylogues on the mental lexicon. John Benjamins.
Libben, G. (in press). Words as action: consequences for the monolingual and bilingual lexicon. In A. Tsedryk and C. Doe (Eds.). Words: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy. Cambridge Scholars Press.
(2014). The nature of compounds: a psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 311, 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G. & Jarema, G. (2002). Mental lexicon research in the new millennium. Brain and Language, 811, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2006). The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G. & Jarema, G., Derwing, B., Riccardii, & Perlak, D. (2016). Seeking the –ational in derivational morphology. Aphasiology, 30:11, 1304–1324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., Gagné, C., & Dressler, W. U. (in press). The representation and processing of compounds words. In V. Pirreli, I. Plag & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Word Knowledge and Word Usage: a Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logo
Libben, G., Goral, M. & Baayen, R. H. (2017). Dynamicity and compound processing in bilinguals. In Libben, M., Goral, M. & Libben, G. (Eds.). Bilingualism: A Framework for Understanding the Mental Lexicon. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 4 (3), 430–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massol, S., Molinaro, N., Carreiras, M. (2015). Lexical inhibition of neighbors during visual word recognition: an unmasked priming investigation. Brain Research, 16041, 35–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monahan, P., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2008). Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language, 1061, 65–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2014). Do masked orthographic neighbor primes facilitate or inhibit the processing of Kanji compound words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 401, 813–840.Google Scholar
Smolka, E. & Libben, G. (2017). Semantic Transparency and compounding. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2023. CAOSS and transcendence: Modeling role-dependent constituent meanings in compounds. Morphology 33:4  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Kříž, Adam & Denisa Bordag
2023. The role of L1 translation form in L2 compound processing: the case of native Czech speakers processing German noun-noun compounds. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Libben, Gary
2022. From Lexicon to Flexicon: The Principles of Morphological Transcendence and Lexical Superstates in the Characterization of Words in the Mind. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 DOI logo
Ghali, Samantha, Mira Goral & Heba Salama
2021. Developing a Framework for a Remote, International Research Collaboration Among Graduate Students: Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 6:6  pp. 1820 ff. DOI logo
Hennecke, Inga & Harald Baayen
2021. Romance N Prep N constructions in visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon 16:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Momenian, Mohammad, Shuk K. Cham, Jafar Mohammad Amini, Narges Radman & Brendan Weekes
2021. Capturing the effects of semantic transparency in word recognition: a cross-linguistic study on Cantonese and Persian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:5  pp. 612 ff. DOI logo
Kuperman, Victor & Avital Deutsch
2020. Morphological and visual cues in compound word reading: Eye-tracking evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:12  pp. 2177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.