Obituary
In memoriam
Geoff Hollis-Haynes (1983–2021)
References (28)
References
Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human
memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological
Review,
96
(4), 703. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dennett, D. C. (2006). The
frame problem of AI. Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary
Readings,
433
1, 67–83.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2009). Observed
Interdependence of Cognition and Action: The Hand Says’ No’to ROWS (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Cincinnati).
Hollis, G., Kloos, H., & Van Orden, G. C. (2009). Origins
of order in cognitive activity. In S. J. Guastello, M. Koopmans, & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos
and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical
systems (pp. 206–241). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2017). Estimating
the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models. Memory &
Cognition,
45
(8), 1350–1370. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2016). The
principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of
semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review 23.6 (2016): 1744–1756. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2018). Scoring
best-worst data in unbalanced many-item designs, with applications to crowdsourcing semantic
judgments. Behavior Research
Methods,
50
(2), 711–729. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2019). Learning
about things that never happened: A critique and refinement of the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are
possible. Memory &
Cognition,
47
(7), 1415–1430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2020a). The
role of number of items per trial in best–worst scaling experiments. Behavior Research
Methods,
52
(2), 694–722. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2020b). Delineating
linguistic contexts, and the validity of context diversity as a measure of a word’s contextual
variability. Journal of Memory and
Language,
114
1, 104146. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2006). NUANCE:
Naturalistic University of Alberta nonlinear correlation explorer. Behavior Research
Methods,
38
(1), 8–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2018). When
is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic
norms. Behavior Research
Methods,
50
(1), 115–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Lefsrud, L. (2017). Extrapolating
human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental
Psychology,
70
(8), 1603–1619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G., Westbury, C. F., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). NUANCE
3.0: Using genetic programming to model variable relationships. Behavior Research
Methods,
38
(2), 218–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How
useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 68(8), 1623–1642. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The
Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1987). The
robot’s dilemma. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A
theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and
nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and
Theory,
2
1, 64–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sidhu, D. M., Westbury, C., Hollis, G., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Sound
symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 1–9. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snefjella, B., & Blank, I. (2020). Computational
Estimation of Lexical Semantic Norms: A New Framework. The 34th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence
Processing.
Van Orden, G., Hollis, G., & Wallot, S. (2012). The
blue-collar brain. Frontiers in
Physiology,
3
1, 207. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., Hollis, G., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Weighing
up the evidence for sound symbolism: Distributional properties predict cue strength. Journal of
Memory and
Language,
99
1, 122–150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., & Hollis, G. (2007). Putting
Humpty Together Again: Synthetic Approaches to Nonlinear Variable Effects Underlying Lexical
Access (pp. 7–30). In: Jarema, G. & Libben, B. The
Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., & Hollis, G. (2019a). Conceptualizing
syntactic categories as semantic categories: Unifying part-of-speech identification and semantics using co-occurrence vector
averaging. Behavior Research
Methods,
51
(3), 1371–1398. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., & Hollis, G. (2019b). Wriggly,
squiffy, lummox, and boobs: What makes some words funny?. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General,
148
(1), 97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westbury, C., & Hollis, G. (2021). A
pompous snack: On the unreasonable complexity of the world’s third-worst jokes. Canadian
Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wheeler, M. (2008). Cognition
in context: phenomenology, situated robotics and the frame problem. International Journal of
Philosophical
Studies,
16
(3), 323–349. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)