Auditory and visual processing of novel stimuli are affected by subjective connotations of Danger and Usefulness
The automatic evaluation literature and the survivability memory enhancement effect (Nairne et al., 2007) suggest that stimuli might be automatically categorized along an approach/withdraw dimension. Duckworth et al. (2002) showed that such effects hold even for novel stimuli. The current study is a more rigorous test of the idea that such effects reflect a general organizing principle of cognitive-perceptual processing. Participants performed auditory (Experiment 1) or visual (Experiment 2) lexical decision. The pseudowords had been previously rated by different participants on subjective Danger and Usefulness. RTs for the pseudowords showed the same Danger × Usefulness interaction observed several times for real words: increasing Danger speeded RTs for words lower on Usefulness but slowed RTs for words higher on Usefulness. Danger and Usefulness classifications are an integral part of routine stimulus processing from the very first exposure. Results are discussed in terms of a general organizing principle of human cognition.
References (72)
Antonucci, S.M., & Reilly, J. (2008). Semantic memory and language processing: A primer. Seminars in Speech and Language, 291, 5–17. 

Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, B.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. 

Barenboym, D.A., Wurm, L.H., & Cano, A. (2010). A comparison of stimulus ratings made online and in person: Gender and method effects. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 273–285. 

Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. 

Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 591, 617–645. 

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. [URL].
Bradley, M.M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 461, 1–11. 

Butler, A.C., Kang, S.H.K., & Roediger, H.L. III (2009). Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1477–1486. 

Cacioppo, J.T., & Berntson, G.G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 1151, 401–423. 

Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., & Berntson, G.G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualization and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 3–25. 

Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., & Berntson, G.G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 761, 839–855. 

Chen, S., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 251, 215–224. 

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Darwin, C. (1968). The origin of species (J.W. Burrow, Ed.). New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1859.)
Davidson, R.J. (1992). Prolegomenon to the structure of emotion: Gleanings from neuropsychology. Cognition and Emotion, 61, 245–268. 

Duckworth, K.L., Bargh, J.A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 131, 513–519. 

Fodor, J.A., & Garrett, M.F., Walker, E.C.T., & Parkes, C.H. (1980). Against definitions. Cognition, 81, 263–367. 

Forster, K.I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1109–1115. 

Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kang, S.H.K., McDermott, K.B., & Cohen, S.M. (2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 361, 1151–1156. 

Keuleers, E. (2011). The vwr library, version 0.1. <[URL]>.
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. 

Kitayama, S., & Niedenthal, P.M. (1994). Introduction. In P.M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 1–14). New York: Academic Press. 

Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 371, 547–559. 

McRae, K., de Sa, V.R., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1261, 99–130. 

Miron, M.S. (1961). A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 621, 623–630. 

Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A. (2011). The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325–347. 

Nairne, J.S., & Pandeirada, J.N.S. (2008a). Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 377–385. 

Nairne, J.S., & Pandeirada, J.N.S. (2008b). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 171, 239–243. 

Nairne, J.S., & Pandeirada, J.N.S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Nature’s criterion and the functionalist agenda. American Journal of Psychology, 123(4), 381–390. 

Nairne, J.S., & Pandeirada, J.N.S. (2011). Congruity effects in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 539–549. 

Nairne, J.S., Pandeirada, J.N.S., Gregory, K.J., & Van Arsdall, J.E. (2009). Adaptive memory: Fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 201, 740–746. 

Nairne, J.S., Pandeirada, J.N.S., & Thompson, S.R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 191, 176–180. 

Nairne, J.S., Thompson, S.R., & Pandeirada, J.N.S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 331, 263–273. 

Oakland official: Regional committee should manage Detroit’s water department. (2011, January 26). Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from [URL].
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 1081, 483–522. 

Palmore, C.C., Garcia, A.D., Bacon, L.P., Johnson, C.A., & Kelemen, W.L. (2011). Congruity influence memory and judgments of learning during survival processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, advance online publication, November 19.
Pulvermüller, F. (1992). Constituents of a neurological theory of language. Concepts in Neuroscience, 31, 157–200.
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 253–279. 

Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflection of words and their meanings. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, 517–524. 

Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V.V., & Ilmoniemi, R.J. (2005a). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 211, 793–797. 

Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R.J. (2005b). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 171, 884–892. 

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K.R. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 181, 317–352. 

Schimmack, U. (2005). Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: Threat, negativity, or arousal? Emotion, 51, 55–66. 

Schneirla, T.C. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Schneirla, T.C. (1965). Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 11, 1–74. 

Solarz, A.K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 591, 239–245. 

Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science, 201, 135–138. 

Vakoch, D.A., & Wurm, L.H. (1997). Emotional connotation in speech perception: Semantic associations in the general lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 11(4), 337–349. 

Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J.M., & Roediger, H.L. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory & Cognition, 361, 913–919. 

Witherell, D., Wurm, L.H., Seaman, S.R., Brugnone, N.A., & Fulford, E.T. (2012). Danger and usefulness effects as a function of concept ancientness. The Mental Lexicon, 7(2), 183–209. 

Wurm, L.H. (2000). Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 255–271. 

Wurm, L.H. (2007). Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1218–1225. 

Wurm, L.H. (2011). Decreasing complexity of affective space in older adults lower on cognitive control: Affective effects in a non-affective task and with non-affective stimuli. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 716–730. 

Wurm, L.H., Labouvie-Vief, G., Aycock, J., Rebucal, K.A., & Koch, H.E. (2004a). Performance in auditory and visual emotional Stroop tasks: A comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 191, 523–535. 

Wurm, L.H., & Ross, S.E. (2001). Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 39–57. 

Wurm, L.H., & Seaman, S.R. (2008). Semantic effects in naming and perceptual identification, but not in delayed naming: Implications for models and tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 381–398. 

Wurm, L.H., & Vakoch, D.A. (1996). Dimensions of speech perception: Semantic associations in the affective lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 101, 409–423. 

Wurm, L.H., & Vakoch, D.A. (2000). The adaptive value of lexical connotation in speech perception. Cognition and Emotion, 14(2), 177–191. 

Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Aycock, J., & Childers, R.R. (2003). Semantic effects in lexical access: Evidence from single-word naming. Cognition and Emotion, 17(4), 547–565. 

Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., & Seaman, S.R. (2004b). Recognition of spoken words: Semantic effects in lexical access. Language and Speech, 47(2), 175–204. 

Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Seaman, S.R., & Buchanan, L. (2004c). Semantic effects in auditory word recognition. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 11, 47–62.
Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Strasser, M.R., Calin-Jageman, R., & Ross, S.E. (2001). Speech perception and vocal expression of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 15(6), 831–852. 

Wurm, L.H., Whitman, R.D., Seaman, S.R., Hill, L., & Ulstad, H.M. (2007). Semantic processing in auditory lexical decision: Ear-of-presentation and sex differences. Cognition and Emotion, 21(7), 1470–1495. 

Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 151, 971–979. 

Yeh, W., & Barsalou, L.W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 1191, 349–384. 

Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Alonso, María A., Emiliano Díez & Angel Fernandez
2021.
A set of 750 words in Spanish characterized in two survival-related dimensions: avoiding death and locating nourishment.
Behavior Research Methods 53:1
► pp. 153 ff.

Van Havermaet, Lisa R. & Lee H. Wurm
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.