Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:1 (2015) ► pp.131
References
Antonucci, S.M., & Reilly, J
(2008) Semantic memory and language processing: A primer. Seminars in Speech and Language, 291, 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, B.M
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barenboym, D.A., Wurm, L.H., & Cano, A
(2010) A comparison of stimulus ratings made online and in person: Gender and method effects. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 273–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.W
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 591, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S
(2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. [URL].
Bradley, M.M
(2009) Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 461, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, A.C., Kang, S.H.K., & Roediger, H.L. III
(2009) Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1477–1486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., & Berntson, G.G
(1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 1151, 401–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., & Berntson, G.G
(1997) Beyond bipolar conceptualization and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 761, 839–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., & Bargh, J.A
(1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 251, 215–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P
(1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Darwin, C
(1968) The origin of species (J.W. Burrow, Ed.). New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1859.)Google Scholar
Davidson, R.J
(1992) Prolegomenon to the structure of emotion: Gleanings from neuropsychology. Cognition and Emotion, 61, 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vaan, L., Ernestus, M., & Schreuder, R
(2011) The lifespan of lexical traces for novel morphologically complex words. The Mental Lexicon, 6(3), 374–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vaan, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H
Duckworth, K.L., Bargh, J.A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S
(2002) The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 131, 513–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A., & Garrett, M.F., Walker, E.C.T., & Parkes, C.H
(1980) Against definitions. Cognition, 81, 263–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I
(2000) The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1109–1115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J
(1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kang, S.H.K., McDermott, K.B., & Cohen, S.M
(2008) The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 361, 1151–1156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E
(2011) The vwr library, version 0.1. [URL].
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M
(2010) Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Niedenthal, P.M
(1994) Introduction. In P.M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 1–14). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K
(1935) A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., & McNorgan, C
(2005) Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 371, 547–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McRae, K., de Sa, V.R., & Seidenberg, M.S
(1997) On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1261, 99–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miron, M.S
(1961) A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 621, 623–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A
(2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairne, J.S., & Pandeirada, J.N.S
(2008a) Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 377–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 171, 239–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Adaptive memory: Nature’s criterion and the functionalist agenda. American Journal of Psychology, 123(4), 381–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Congruity effects in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 539–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairne, J.S., Pandeirada, J.N.S., Gregory, K.J., & Van Arsdall, J.E
(2009) Adaptive memory: Fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 201, 740–746. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairne, J.S., Pandeirada, J.N.S., & Thompson, S.R
(2008) Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 191, 176–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairne, J.S., Thompson, S.R., & Pandeirada, J.N.S
(2007) Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 331, 263–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakland official: Regional committee should manage Detroit’s water department
(2011, January 26). Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from [URL].
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S
(2001) Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 1081, 483–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmore, C.C., Garcia, A.D., Bacon, L.P., Johnson, C.A., & Kelemen, W.L
(2011) Congruity influence memory and judgments of learning during survival processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, advance online publication, November 19.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F
(1992) Constituents of a neurological theory of language. Concepts in Neuroscience, 31, 157–200.Google Scholar
(1999) Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 253–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Brain reflection of words and their meanings. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 51, 517–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V.V., & Ilmoniemi, R.J
(2005a) Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 211, 793–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R.J
(2005b) Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 171, 884–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL].Google Scholar
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K.R
(2005) A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 181, 317–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schimmack, U
(2005) Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: Threat, negativity, or arousal? Emotion, 51, 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneirla, T.C
(1959) An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(1965) Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 11, 1–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solarz, A.K
(1960) Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 591, 239–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, H., & Schwarz, N
(2009) If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science, 201, 135–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Havermaet, L.R., & Wurm, L.H
Vakoch, D.A., & Wurm, L.H
(1997) Emotional connotation in speech perception: Semantic associations in the general lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 11(4), 337–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J.M., & Roediger, H.L
(2008) Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory & Cognition, 361, 913–919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witherell, D., Wurm, L.H., Seaman, S.R., Brugnone, N.A., & Fulford, E.T
(2012) Danger and usefulness effects as a function of concept ancientness. The Mental Lexicon, 7(2), 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H
(2000) Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 255–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1218–1225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Decreasing complexity of affective space in older adults lower on cognitive control: Affective effects in a non-affective task and with non-affective stimuli. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 716–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., & Cano, A
(2010) Stimulus norming: It is too soon to close down brick-and-mortar labs. The Mental Lexicon, 5(3), 358–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Labouvie-Vief, G., Aycock, J., Rebucal, K.A., & Koch, H.E
(2004a) Performance in auditory and visual emotional Stroop tasks: A comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 191, 523–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., & Ross, S.E
(2001) Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., & Seaman, S.R
(2008) Semantic effects in naming and perceptual identification, but not in delayed naming: Implications for models and tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 381–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., & Vakoch, D.A
(1996) Dimensions of speech perception: Semantic associations in the affective lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 101, 409–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) The adaptive value of lexical connotation in speech perception. Cognition and Emotion, 14(2), 177–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Aycock, J., & Childers, R.R
(2003) Semantic effects in lexical access: Evidence from single-word naming. Cognition and Emotion, 17(4), 547–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., & Seaman, S.R
(2004b) Recognition of spoken words: Semantic effects in lexical access. Language and Speech, 47(2), 175–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Seaman, S.R., & Buchanan, L
(2004c) Semantic effects in auditory word recognition. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 11, 47–62.Google Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Vakoch, D.A., Strasser, M.R., Calin-Jageman, R., & Ross, S.E
(2001) Speech perception and vocal expression of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 15(6), 831–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L.H., Whitman, R.D., Seaman, S.R., Hill, L., & Ulstad, H.M
(2007) Semantic processing in auditory lexical decision: Ear-of-presentation and sex differences. Cognition and Emotion, 21(7), 1470–1495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M
(2008) Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 151, 971–979. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeh, W., & Barsalou, L.W
(2006) The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 1191, 349–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Alonso, María A., Emiliano Díez & Angel Fernandez
2021. A set of 750 words in Spanish characterized in two survival-related dimensions: avoiding death and locating nourishment. Behavior Research Methods 53:1  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Van Havermaet, Lisa R. & Lee H. Wurm
2017. Effects of Danger, Usefulness, and Body-Object Interaction in picture naming. The Mental Lexicon 12:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.