Article published In:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 10:1 (2015) ► pp.5387
References
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P
(1996) Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition, 601, 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, D
(2004) Oxford placement test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J.M., Rowland, C.F., & Young, C.R
(2008) The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 1061, 87–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M
(1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banga, A., Hanssen, E., Neijt, A., & Schreuder, R
Bates, D., & Sarkar, D
(2007) lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-0).
Berent, I., & Pinker, S
Binder, K., Duffy S., & Rayner, K
(2001) The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 441, 297–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H
(1988) On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988 (pp. 45–66). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Buck-Gengler, C., Menn, L., & Healy, A
(2004) What “mice trap” tells us about the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 901, 453–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P
(2007) ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 161–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H
(1995) German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), The Current State of Interlanguage (pp. 123–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M
(2001) Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua, 1111, 729–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C
(2006a) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 271, 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 564–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Bartke, S., & Wiese, R
(1996) Compounding and inflection in German child language. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (pp. 115–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H
(2007) The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 1041, 476–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, G., Burger, L.K., & Svec, W.R
(1997) Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 1041, 123–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A., & Williams, E
(1987) On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I
(2012) Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 331, 571–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H
(2012) The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 67–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A.L., & Marchman, V.A
(2008) Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernandez, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Online methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino R., Bost, J., Abel, A.D., & Zuccarelli, J
García Mayo, M.P
(2006) Synthetic compounding in the English interlanguage of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 31, 231–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P
(1985) Level ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 211, 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J.H
(1966) Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Tunstall, S
(2002) Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 461, 267–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haskell, T.R., MacDonald, M.C., & Seidenberg, M.S
(2003) Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 119–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R
(2011) dlexDB – Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 621, 10–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C
in press). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. DOI logo
Jaensch, C., Heyer, V., Gordon, P., & Clahsen, H
(2014) What plurals and compounds reveal about constraints in word formation. Language Acquisition, 211, 319–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P
(1982) From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (part 1). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D
(1995a) L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 111, 20–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) ‘Differential’ treatment of regular vs. irregular inflection in compounds as nonevidence for level-ordering. Second Language Research, 111, 267–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J
(2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 551, 381–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G
(1995) L2 learners treat regular and irregular inflection differently in compounding. Second Language Research, 111, 88–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J.A., & Magnuson, J.S
(2008) Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 475–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V
(2000) Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology. Language Learning, 501, 153–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V.A., & Hayes, J
(2010) Processing English compounds in the first and second language: The influence of the middle morpheme. Language Learning, 601, 194–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J.B., & Rice, M.L
(1993) Plural acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 361, 1236–1248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S
(1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (URL [URL]).
Ramscar, M., & Dye, M
(2010) Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 621, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C
(2011) Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 321, 299–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L.L., & Haverkort, M
(2003) Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R.J. Towell (Eds.), The Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 175–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., MacDonald, M.C., & Haskell, T.R
(2007) Semantics and phonology constrain compound formation. The Mental Lexicon, 21, 287–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E
(1982) The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, A., Kim, J.J., Pinker, S., & Collins, C
(2005) The plurals-in-compounds effect. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Barnard College.Google Scholar
Silva R., Gerth, S., & Clahsen, H
(2013) Morphological constraints in children’s spoken language comprehension: A visual world study of plurals inside compounds in English. Cognition, 1291, 457–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M.J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C
(2002) Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 451, 447–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G
(2001) Sentence Comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J.C
(2008) Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. In I.A. Sekerina, E.M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children’s language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A
(2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 64–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J., & Christian, V
(2000) Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: A grammar-specific versus input-processing deficit? Cognition, 751, 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, R
(1996) Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 271, 183–193.Google Scholar
Zukowski, A
(2005) Knowledge of constraints on compounding in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 481, 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Chung, Eun Seon & Jeong-Ah Shin
2023. Native and second language processing of quantifier scope ambiguity. Second Language Research 39:3  pp. 785 ff. DOI logo
Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser
2018. SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3  pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
FARHY, YAEL, JOÃO VERÍSSIMO & HARALD CLAHSEN
2018. Do late bilinguals access pure morphology during word recognition? A masked-priming study on Hebrew as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:5  pp. 945 ff. DOI logo
Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova
2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming . . . eventually. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5  pp. 1112 ff. DOI logo
Jessen, Anna, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen
2018. Variability and consistency in late bilinguals’ morphology. The Mental Lexicon 13:2  pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Maeng, Junghwan
2023. Lexicon over Syntax: L2 Structural Processing of Chinese Separable Verbs. Languages 8:3  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Song, Yoonsang, Youngah Do, Arthur L. Thompson, Eileen R. Waegemaekers & Jongbong Lee
2020. SECOND LANGUAGE USERS EXHIBIT SHALLOW MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:5  pp. 1121 ff. DOI logo
VERÍSSIMO, JOÃO
2016. Extending a Gradient Symbolic approach to the native versus non-native contrast: The case of plurals in compounds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:5  pp. 900 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.