Article published In:
Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
Edited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 164185
References
Andrews, S., & Lo, S
(2013) Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 279–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L
(1995) The CELEX lexical database (release 2). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I
(2013) The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, K
(2013) Graphemic alternations in English as a reflex of morphological structure. Morphology, 231, 387–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press). Sichtbare Flexionsmorphologie im Englischen und Deutschen. Der Umgang mit Variation in der Schreibung von Stämmen und Affixen. To appear in: Fuhrhop, N., Szczepaniak, R. & Schmidt, K (Eds.) Sichtbare und hörbare Morphologie
(2016) Double consonants in English. Graphemic, morphological, prosodic and etymological determinants. Reading and Writing, 29.31, 453–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, K. & Aronoff, M
to appear). Self-organization in the spelling of English suffixes: The emergence of culture out of anarchy. To appear in Language.
Berg, K., Buchmann, F., Dybiec, K., & Fuhrhop, N
(2014) Morphological spellings in English. Written Language and Literacy, 171, 282–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Baayen, R.H., & Schreuder, R
(2000) Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 421, 390–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catach, N
(1980) L’orthographe française. Traité théorique et pratique. Paris: F. Nathan.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C.J., & Rastle, K
(2016) Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 691, 113–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, C., Kim, J., & Barbaro, A
(2010) Masked speech priming: Neighborhood size matters. Journal Acoustical Society of America, 1271, 2110–2113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.H., & Rastle, K
(2010) Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O’Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martín (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 171, 749–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis. J
(1984) The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J
(2005) Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morphosemantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 201, 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L.B., O’Connor, P.A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 161, 684–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L.B., Milin, P., Cho, K.W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., & O’Connor, P.A
(2015) Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91, 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flemming, E., & Johnson, S
(2007) Rosa’s roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 371, 83–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J
(2003) The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.) Masked priming. The state of the art. (pp. 3–37). Hove (UK): Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Heyer, V. & Clahsen, H
(2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived nouns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 543–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. & Frost, R
(1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., Joanisse, M.F., & Hare, M.L
(2008) Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E
(2005) Subliminal speech priming. Psychological Science, 161, 617–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Ratle, K
(2012) Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 381, 811–816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lázaro, M., Illera, V., & Sainz, J
(2016) The suffix priming effect: Further evidence for an early morpho-orthographic segmentation process independent of its semantic content. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 197–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P.A
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 181, 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H
(1969) The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd ed. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In M.G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B
(2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 394–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Ford, M., Older, L., & Zhou, X
(1996) The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 223–227.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R., & Older, L
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 1011, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zhou, X
(1999) Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 141, 321–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisenburg, T
(1998) Zur Typologie von Alphabetschriftsystemen anhand des Parameters der Tiefe. Linguistische Berichte, 1731, 43–64.Google Scholar
Otto, E.J
(2012) Morphological processing in bilingual speakers of German and English. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Royal Holloway, University of London, London.Google Scholar
Pastizzo, M.J., & Feldman, L.B
(2002) Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 281, 244–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I., Homann, J., & Kunter, G
(2015) Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Randall, B., & Tyler, L.K
(2008) The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 1091, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H
(2003) Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279–305). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 231, 942–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 507–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., & New, B
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 111, 1090–1098. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G
(1985) Writing systems. A linguistic introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Segui, J., & Grainger, J
(1990) Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 161, 65–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F
(2009) When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 241, 337–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Preller, K.H., & Eulitz, C
(2014) ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 721, 16‑36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R
(2010) Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taft, M., Castles, A., Davis, C., Lazendic, G. & Nguygen-Hoan, M
(2008) Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 366–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M
(2010) A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 251, 277–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L.K., Randall, B., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(2002) Phonology and neuropsychology of the English past tense. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1154–1166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ussishkin, A., Dawson, C.R., Wedel, A., & Schluter, K
(2015) Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 301, 1096–1115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Bar-On, Amalia & Victor Kuperman
2019. Spelling errors respect morphology: a corpus study of Hebrew orthography. Reading and Writing 32:5  pp. 1107 ff. DOI logo
Adam Brown
2018. Morphological Strategy. In Understanding and Teaching English Spelling,  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Gunnar Jacob & Niels O. Schiller
2019. Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226482 ff. DOI logo
Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Naledi Kgolo & Harald Clahsen
2020. Morphological decomposition in Bantu: a masked priming study on Setswana prefixation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10  pp. 1257 ff. DOI logo
Dal Maso, Serena & Hélène Giraudo
2019. On the interplay between family and series effects in morphological masked priming. Morphology 29:2  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Hettwer, Caroline & Nanna Fuhrhop
2021. Chapter 6. Stem constancy under the microscope. In All Things Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 353],  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Heyer, Vera
2021. Below the surface: The application of implicit morpho-graphic regularities to novel word spelling. Morphology 31:3  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova
2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming . . . eventually. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:5  pp. 1112 ff. DOI logo
Iwao, Haruka Sophia, Sally Andrews & Aaron Veldre
2024. Sensitivity to morphological spelling regularities in Chinese-English bilinguals and English monolinguals. Reading and Writing DOI logo
Muschalik, Julia & Gero Kunter
2024. Do letters matter? The influence of spelling on acoustic duration. Phonetica 81:2  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Sagi, Romi, J. S. H. Taylor, Kyriaki Neophytou, Tamar Cohen, Brenda Rapp, Kathleen Rastle & Michal Ben-Shachar
2024. White matter associations with spelling performance. Brain Structure and Function DOI logo
Seyfarth, Scott, Jozina Vander Klok & Marc Garellek
2019. Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:5  pp. 1690 ff. DOI logo
Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin & Ravit Cohen-Mimran
2024. On the role of morphology in early spelling in Hebrew and Arabic. Morphology 34:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Treiman, Rebecca, Sloane Wolter & Brett Kessler
2021. How sensitive are adults to the role of morphology in spelling?. Morphology 31:3  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Yablonski, Maya & Michal Ben-Shachar
2020. Sensitivity to word structure in adult Hebrew readers is associated with microstructure of the ventral reading pathways. Cortex 128  pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Yablonski, Maya, Kathleen Rastle, J.S.H. Taylor & Michal Ben-Shachar
2019. Structural properties of the ventral reading pathways are associated with morphological processing in adult English readers. Cortex 116  pp. 268 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.