Article published In:
Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
Edited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 216241
Blevins, J
(1995) Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 181, 113–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, Th
(2008) Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 371, 69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
(1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 101, 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C
(1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 281, 297–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., Hadler, M., & Sonnenstuhl, I
(2001) The mental representation of inflected words: An experimental study of adjectives and verbs in German. Language, 771, 510–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G., & Fraser, N
(1993) Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 291, 113–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Martino, M., Bracco, G., & Laudanna, A
(2011) The activation of grammatical gender information in processing Italian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 745–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., & Jacobson, Th
(1999) Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 281, 467–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, St., & Pickering, M.J
(1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 1366–1383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J
(2001) Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in romance clitic systems. In G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, & S. Vikner (Eds.), Optimal theoretic syntax (pp. 205–240). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Vol. 24 of current studies in linguistics (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Some key features of distributed morphology. In H.H. Andrew Carnie & T. Bures (Eds.), MITWPL: Papers on Phonology and Morphology, Vol. 211 (pp. 275–288). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Holmes, V.M., & Segui, J
(2004) Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 331, 425–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, U., & Penke, M
(2002) How are inflectional affixes organized in the mental lexicon? Evidence from the investigation of agreement errors in agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 811, 180–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M
(1982) Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M
(2009) Case syncretism in German feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In P. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 141–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H
(2002) Underspecified recognition. Labphon, 71, 637–676.Google Scholar
(2010) Distinctive features: phonological under-specification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 381, 44–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M.T
(1980) Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 81, 415–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., Seigneuric, A., & Spinelli, E
(2008) The morpheme gender effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 88–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opitz, A., Regel, St., Müller, G., & Friederici, A.D
(2013) Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language, 891, 231–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M
(2006) Flexion im mentalen Lexikon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Eisenbeiss, S
(2004) Psycholinguistic evidence for the underspecification of morphosyntactic features. Brain and Language, 901, 423–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Frisson, St
(2001) Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 556–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L
(1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 891, 60–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H
(1993) Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 841–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Caramazza, A
(2003) Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 169–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., & Gonnerman, L.M
(2000) Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 353–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockall, L., & Marantz, A
Stump, G
(2001) Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trommer, J
(2006) Person and number agreement in Dumi. Linguistics, 441, 1011–1057. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegera, Kl.-P
(1997) Das Genus: Ein Beitrag zur Didaktik des DaF-Unterrichts. Munich: Iudicum-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D
(1996) Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 93–114). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

2019. Misbehaved masculines: Incidental acquisition of grammatical gender in L2 German during reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:1  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Kimball, Amelia E., Kailen Shantz, Christopher Eager & Joseph Roy
2019. Confronting Quasi-Separation in Logistic Mixed Effects for Linguistic Data: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 26:3  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Klassen, Rachel, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
2023. L1 Grammatical Gender Variation through the Representation in the Lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:2  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Kupisch, Tanja, Miriam Geiss, Natalia Mitrofanova & Marit Westergaard
2022. Structural and phonological cues for gender assignment in monolingual and bilingual children acquiring German. Experiments with real and nonce words. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Lohndal, Terje & Marit Westergaard
2021. Grammatical Gender: Acquisition, Attrition, and Change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Pinta, Justin
2022. Gender Agreement in Correntino Spanish. Journal of Language Contact 14:3  pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Ruberg, Tobias
2021. Gender agreement in SLI: A study on production and inflection of articles in German. Language Acquisition 28:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Seyboth, Margret & Frank Domahs
2023. Why do He and She Disagree: The Role of Binary Morphological Features in Grammatical Gender Agreement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:3  pp. 923 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.