Article published In:
Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
Edited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 242276
Badecker, W., & Kuminiak, F
(2007) Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 561, 65–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badecker, W., & Lewis, R
(2007) A new theory and computational model of working memory in sentence production: Agreement errors as failures of cue-based retrieval. In 20th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. San Diego, La Jolla, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S
(2013) Linear mixed-effect models using Eigen and S4. R package version: 1.0-5. [URL].
Belić, B
(2008) Minor paucal in Serbian. In G. Zybatow, L. Szucsich, U. Junghanns, & R. Meyer (Eds.), Formal description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003 (pp. 258–269). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Eberhard, K.M
(1993) Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 57–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., & Miller, C.A
(1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 231, 45–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J
(2001) Explaining morphosyntactic competition. Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 111–44.Google Scholar
Browne, W
(1993) 7 Serbo-Croat. The Slavonic Languages, 306–387.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G
(1983) Hierarchies, targets and controllers: Agreement patterns in slavic.Google Scholar
(2000) Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, K.M
(1997) The marked effect of number on subject–verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 147–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franck, J., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Chillier, L., Frauenfelder, U.H., Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Zesiger, P
(2004) Normal and pathological development of subject–verb agreement in speech production: A study on French children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 171, 147–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J
(2002) Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 171, 371–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, S
(1994) Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 121, 597–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J.H
(1966) Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harrison, A.J
(2009) Production of subject-verb agreement in Slovene and English (Doctoral dissertation). The University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.J., Antón-Méndez, I., & van Zee, M
(2001) Object attraction in subject-verb agreement construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 451, 546‑572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.J., Schriefers, H.J., Bock, K., & Kikstra, G.M
(2003) Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. Memory & Cognition, 311, 1316–1326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M
(2006) Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of linguistics, 421, 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Häussler, J
(2009) The emergence of attraction errors during sentence comprehension (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Humphreys, K.R., & Bock, K
(2005) Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 121, 689–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kager, R., Qiuwu (马秋武)· Ma, & Jialing (王嘉龄)· Wang
(1999) Optimality theory (Vol. 21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klajn, I
(2005) Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J
(1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 141, 41–104. London: Croom Helm. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L., & Carreiras, M
(2011) When persons disagree: an ERP study of Unagreement in Spanish. Psychophysiology, 481, 1361–1371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.J
(2011) Doing optimality theory: Applying theory to data.John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Carreiras, C., & Duñabeitia, J.A
(2012) Semantic combinatorial processing of non-anomalous expressions. Neuroimage, 591, 3488–3501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinaro, N., Vespignani, F., Canal, P., Fonda, S., & Cacciari, C
(2008) Cloze-probability does not only affect N400 amplitude: The case of complex prepositions. Psychophysiology, 451, 1008–1012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez, A., Molinaro, N., Mancini, S., Barraza, P., & Carreiras, M
(2012) Oscillatory dynamics related to the Unagreement pattern in Spanish. Neuropsychologia, 501, 2584–2597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šarić, A
(2014) Numeral induced agreement mismatches in Serbo-Croatian (Unpublished master dissertation). Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Staub, A
(2009) On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 601, 308–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Team, R.C
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 20121.Google Scholar
Tucker, M.A., Idrissi, A., & Almeida, D
(2015) Representing number in the real-time processing of agreement: self-paced reading evidence from Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology, 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C
(1995) Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: the role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 341, 186‑215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M.F
(1996a) Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 611, 261–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R.J., Jarema, G., & Kolk, H.H.J
(1996b) One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 111, 407–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagers, M.W., Lau, E.F., & Phillips, C
(2009) Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 206–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, S., & Zlatić, L
(2003) The many faces of agreement. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Zlatić, L
(1997) The structure of the Serbian noun phrase (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Bleotu, Adina Camelia & Brian Dillon
2024. Romanian (subject-like) DPs attract more than bare nouns: Evidence from speeded continuations. Journal of Memory and Language 134  pp. 104445 ff. DOI logo
Driemel, Imke & Jelena Stojković
2019. How to agree with a QNP. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Hammerly, Christopher, Adrian Staub & Brian Dillon
2019. The grammaticality asymmetry in agreement attraction reflects response bias: Experimental and modeling evidence. Cognitive Psychology 110  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Lago, Sol, Martina Gračanin-Yuksek, Duygu Fatma Şafak, Orhan Demir, Bilal Kırkıcı & Claudia Felser
2019.  Straight from the horse’s mouth . Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:3  pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Reifegerste, Jana, Rebecca Jarvis & Claudia Felser
2020. Effects of chronological age on native and nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from subject-verb agreement in German. Journal of Memory and Language 111  pp. 104083 ff. DOI logo
Tucker, Matthew A., Ali Idrissi & Diogo Almeida
2021. Attraction Effects for Verbal Gender and Number Are Similar but Not Identical: Self-Paced Reading Evidence From Modern Standard Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Türk, Utku & Pavel Logačev
2024. Agreement attraction in Turkish: the case of genitive attractors. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.